Movie Review : Barfi!

Rating : 4.5/5
Genre : Drama
Year : 2012
Running time : 2 hours 30 minutes
Director : Anurag Basu
Cast : Ranbir Kapoor, Priyanka Chopra, Ileana D’Cruz, Saurabh Shukla, Akaash Khurana, Roopa Ganguly
Kid rating : G

With Barfi, I’d expected a half-decent film. What I got was a spectacular one. It is rare that you get more than you expect; a good day ’twas then.

Barfi (Kapoor) is a deaf-mute happy-go-lucky young man, full of good humor and happiness. He meets Shruti (d’Cruz) and the two fall in love. However Shruti is persuaded by her mother (Ganguly) to choose Ranjeet Sengupta, a well-to-do young man as husband, instead of the impoverished Barfi. Shruti moves to Calcutta with Ranjeet. When she meets Barfi some years later, he has a young woman in tow. Shruti realizes to her despair that he, apparently, has gotten over her and moved on while she hasn’t . . .

This film is simple and charming. Set in the Darjeeling of the1970s, it seems almost like a tale from one of Ruskin Bond’s books. Barfi is told from many different view-points; at times it is a police inspector (Saurabh Shukla) narrating, at times a friend of Barfi’s, and at times Shruti. Barfi has the sweet-sad mix of emotions much like “Life is Beautiful” although the stories aren’t comparable. It is the tale of a simple, clear-hearted man. In his life there is a hope and joy, sadness and pathos, love and betrayal and disappointment. Each of these emotions is finely etched and put out for us to see and feel until we are moved. I wept buckets.

And then it has it’s comedic moments, very Chaplinesque and home-grown in nature. There is a lot of detail and nuance in this film. Anurag Basu as writer and director displays a keen sensibility for the affairs of the heart. The people in this film are each swayed by it to some degrees and do with it what they will. But they rise even in times of heart-breaking sorrow, displaying a fineness of the soul. They are better than they can be, giving away the joys that they could have had, and that makes Barfi the feel-good, uplifting film that it is.

Ranbir Kapoor is superb as Barfi. As the silent young man, he tempers Barfi’s effervescent joy with an agreeable, forgiving nature. As if Rockstar was not enough Ranbir comes up with another fantastic performance to highlight his meteoric rise to superstardom in these short five years (he debuted in Saawariya in 2007). I’m in awe of his work in this film.

Priyanka plays the autistic Jhilmil Chatterjee. While watching the trailer I was skeptical of Priyanka’s ability to carry off this difficult role (I was cringing anticipating another ham-handed portrayal of autism), but she does it with aplomb. Kudos ! The new girl on the Hindi-movie block, Ileana D’Cruz, is quite impressive. With her elfin face, and sultry looks Ileana is quite a delicate beauty and plays heart-breaker Shruti. She is also a pretty good actress. In a scene in the film, during the song “Phir Le Aaya Dil”, you can see the emotions flit across her face, as Shruti, now Mrs. Shruti Sengupta, chances upon the-love-of-her-life Barfi after a gap of some years. He is as charming and guileless as ever. She is fettered by her marriage, and he has Jhilmil. Alas!

I cannot fault Basu on much in this film. I loved the characters, felt each of them well-developed and real people in their own right. Perfectly paced, this film is a lingering tale, best taken in in long, slow draughts. The songs are a marvel. Music by Pritam, the voices of Mohit Chauhan, Rekha Bharadwaj and lyrics by Swanand Kirkire – could one ask for more ? My favorites are Arijit Singh’s rendition of “Phir Le Aaya Dil“, Papon and Sunidhi Chauhan sung “Kyon“, and Nikhil Paul George’s “Main Kya Karoon“.

The flaw in this film (and it is well-nigh ignorable given what this film does) is that the film glosses over reality. Call me cynical, but life isn’t that easy – not for the deaf-mute son of a poor driver. But Barfi as a young boy turns up in immaculate middle-class clothes and sneakers. As a young man, smilingly wrangling money from his old dad, he is well-dressed enough to chance a waltz with the boss’s daughter. No frayed collars, no strains of hardship – not in Darjeeling, and not in Calcutta. So that’s my nit-pick – the fact that this film is so darn pretty – it insists on presenting stuff all glossily packaged. Given that the point of the story is philosophical, not material, it’s not a big deal, except it looks . . . odd. Sigh!

The only other place that could have used more work was Ileana’s makeup as an old woman. (The geriatric makeup made everyone look like everyone else, like they were some long-lost cousins, when they weren’t). Old woman Shruti seemed to develop papery skin and sprout a shock of short, wayward, grey hair which enveloped her delicate face almost disproportionately – making it seem like a wig, which it was, but you know what I mean. And yes, I am aware that people with bad haircuts do exist; it is just that I’d rather not see them on film, especially a film which does so well on etching the finer details.

To wrap-up folks, I loved the film. It is, barring other outstanding newcomers, (and there might be none, considering that we are well on our way to October) my pick for best film of 2012 (and man, oh man, I seem to be saying that a lot these days.)

Kidwise : Clean and classy, this film is kid-safe, even for the young ones. This gets the rare G rating, even rarer for a film this great.

Posted in 2012, bollywood, drama, Hindi movies on Netflix, outstanding, rating-G, recommended | 13 Comments

Movie Preview : Barfi!

I’ll be watching this next weekend, and I hope it’s good. The film stars Ranbir Kapoor, Priyanka Chopra and newcomer-to-Hindi-films Ileana D’Cruz (she looks sad and wistful in the trailer below), so I hope they release it here (you can tell Anurag Kashyap has put the fear of God into me by not releasing this film in the US, can’t you ?).

Barfi is directed by Anurag Basu, he of Life in a Metro fame – we must remember directors by the good work they do, because otherwise I would slide into depression. Unfortunately he also directed Kites, so it’s kind of a toss-up about Barfi. The trailer looks very art-house, so let’s hope for the best:

Posted in 2012, bollywood, Hindi movies on Netflix, Previews | 4 Comments

Movie Review : Gangs of Wasseypur II


Rating : 5/5
Genre : Drama
Year : 2012
Running time : 2 hours 30 minutes
Director : Anurag Kashyap
Cast : Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Huma Qureshi, Richa Chaddha, Zeishan Quadri, Aditya Kumar, Tigmanshu Dhulia, Piyush Mishra, Vineet Singh
Kid rating : A

This film continues the revenge story from Part 1. It has come about that Danish (Vineet Singh) and Faizal Khan (Siddiqui), sons of Sardar Khan (Manoj Bajpai in Part 1) must continue the war that their father fought. Ramadheer Singh is still the enemy; he has grown more powerful since, progressing from a mere “khadaan” owner to a government Minister. Into the fray are also other smaller fish – Babua aka “Perpendicular” (Aditya Kumar), Danish and Faizal’s youngest brother, “Tangent”, Perpendicular’s best friend and “Definite” (Zeishan Quadri), Durga’s son and their step-brother. Perpendicular’s weapon of choice is the humble razor blade, and he wields it with ease, having gotten his nickname because he has learnt that the blade must be used in a perpendicular fashion to kill; applied tangentially the victim survives.

Faizal Khan now has many more enemies. There is Sultan Khan, whose sister is married to Danish. There is Definite, who resents Sardar Khan’s abandonment of his mother, Durga, and wants power for himself. There is Ramadhir Singh (Dhulia) and his son JP “jaypeeya“. And then there are some adversaries that Faizal hasn’t accounted for. There is treachery and deceit everywhere, double-crosses galore. We are never sure when a character is a turncoat.

Like Part 1 was Manoj Bajpayee’s film, this is Nawazuddin Siddiqui’s. As Faizal, gaunt Siddiqui delivers an intense, brooding performance. Physically he is short and thin, but still has a powerful screen presence, and as Faizal, an almost careless bravado, which his enemies realize to their detriment isn’t just bravado, but the real thing. Faizal is ruthless but smart, and soon is the master of Wasseypur.

While both Gow Part 1 & 2 are landmarks in Hindi cinema, I’ve got to say that I liked Part 2 better. While Part 1 was just as arresting, it took a while for the story to get interesting. In Part 2 it’s full steam ahead, right from the get-go. It’s bloody and vengeful, with it’s fair share of narrow gali chases, and gun fights. But it also has dark humor and it’s own specific attempts at romance – Faizal’s courtship of the beautiful Mohsina (Huma Quraishi).

The dialect is still very earthy – Faizal is “Phaijal“, the song lyrics are an odd mix of twisted English “Jo bhi wrong-wa hai usey, set right-wa karo ji“, and the cusswords are still as prolific. The soundtrack and background is impressive – I especially loved “Moora” which started off with “Frustiya nahi moora, narbhasao nahin moora . . .” ; Mohsina sings this to soothe the conflicted Faizal. Here’s the Youtube link which just has the vocals, couldn’t find the video anywhere.

A gorgeous successor to Part 1 and well deserving of the full 5 stars, Gow 2 is my pick for the best film of 2012.

Kidwise : As with Part 1, this is extremely violent and meant for adults only.

Posted in 2012, bollywood, crime, drama, outstanding, rating-A, rating-R, recommended | 14 Comments

Movie Review : Gangs of Wasseypur I

Rating : 4.5/5
Genre : Drama
Year : 2012
Running time : 2 hours 30 minutes
Director : Anurag Kashyap
Cast : Manoj Bajpai, Richa Chaddha, Piyush Mishra, Jameel Khan, Tigmanshu Dhulia, Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Anurita Jha, Huma Qureshi, Jaideep Ahlawat, Vineet Singh, Pankaj Tripathi, Reema Sen
Kid rating : R

Gangs of Wasseypur spans a rivalry across generations. It starts in the pre-independence days, in the small village of Wasseypur with a smoldering rivalry between the Qureshis and the Khans. When Shahid Khan uses the legendary Sultana Daku’s name to rob trains, Sultana Daku’s real successors decide to teach him a lesson. His gang members are massacred and he is forced to leave Wasseypur with a promise never to return. He leaves only to toil in Dhanbad’s mines under a wily boss Ramadhir Singh (Tigmanshu Dhulia). When Shahid Khan disappears mysteriously, his son Sardar Khan (Manoj Bajpayee) grows up to remember his father’s enemies and extract his own brand of revenge on them; he won’t kill them outright he says, “unki keh ke lenge“.

Gow 1 & 2 remind me of The Godfather films (Gow is better though). Because this is the Indian mafia – organic and homegrown. Gow Part1 shows us how this mafia begins in the rural heartland – the petty rivalries which spawn it and keep it going. Underneath all this is the struggle for power in an unpoliced world, where might is right. Sardar Khan is truly his father’s son, brave and wily and a little foolhardy. With help from his family members Asghar Khan (Jameel Khan) and Nasir Ahmed (Piyush Mishra) Sardar Khan sets about vanquishing his enemies.

Gow 1 has many characters. The main ones stand out – this is the tale of Shahid Khan and his successors, but director Kashyap does an outstanding job of delineating each and everyone of them, from the minor to the most major. The tale is set mostly in rural areas of Bihar (now Jharkhand) and the film smacks of that flavor – from the earthy dialogues to the prolific cusswords to the songs – “O womaniya“, “Jiya ho Bihar ke Lala” and the quirky Hunter song. The film is very strongly story based, which is quite unusual because films hyped to this extent are more about the frills than the content. Initially it resembled a small village tale of the 1960s, a la Manoj Kumar, so much so that I began to wonder what the fuss was all about (my parents hadn’t liked the film because of all the bad language) but then it took off and the rest, as they say, is history.

Manoj Bajpai’s flailing career stands resurrected with this film, and he gives a spectacular performance (as expected from an actor of his calibre) as Sardar Khan. With his surma-lined eyes, to his philandering ways, Bajpai is every inch Sardar Khan. This is his film. Married early to Nagma Khatoon (Richa Chaddha) Khan still has a roving eye, and uses his religion (which he says allows him 4 wives) to justify his lust. Thus his entanglement with Durga (Reema Sen), a Hindu recently arrived from Asansol. Sardar Khan spawns many sons, among whom Danish (Vineet Singh) shows a desire to join his father’s business, while Faizal (Nawzuddin Siddiqui) is lost to drugs and hatred.

Perpetually pregnant Nagma is a spirited, feisty woman, who while she berates Sardar Khan for his many failings, remains staunch in her support. Richa is effortless as Nagma Khatoon. Piyush Mishra is part narrator and just as effortless as Nasir Ahmed, Sardar Khan’s right hand man. Tigmanshu Dhulia is Ramadheer Singh, the “khadaan” owner who has overtaken the mines as the British left. Dhulia, director of films like “Haasil”, proves his mettle as an actor too.

The film is engrossing; you don’t move out of your seat fearing a lost nuance. It has all the qualities which make up a great film – a fantastic storyline and screenplay, a talented cast, adept characterization, and an attention to detail from a director who knows what he is doing.This film along with Part 2 are game changers; in the Hindi film industry they are a landmark of sorts, a reminder of what films can be if only the makers know their craft. One of the best films of recent years, this is an absolute must-see.

Kidwise : This is a very violent film, with language suitable for adults only.

Posted in 2012, Best hindi movies, bollywood, crime, drama, outstanding, rating-A, rating-R, recommended | 6 Comments

What to watch on Netflix Instant : Edition #3

[amazon_link id=”B004KAQQ5E” target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Downton Abbey: Episode 1[/amazon_link]

A TV edition this time, so here are a few television show favorites. Some of these are BBC originals while others are Masterpiece Theatre. Rest assured they are all superb!

1. Downton Abbey : The most gloriously addictive drama of all, I saw Season 1 (all 7 hours of it) in 2 (week)days flat, every waking moment I got! And I specify weekdays because I went to work, did all my usual household chores, chauffeured the kids around etc. , AND watched this. Basically I slept very little – but it was so worth it 🙂 ! This is a period piece about the fate of Lord Grantham and his family in 1900s England. Netflix has Season 1, and Huluplus has Season 2. Season 3 airs on PBS in January 2013 – you have till then to catch up!

2. Agatha Christie’s Poirot : David Suchet is the rotund Belgian detective, and Netflix has 6 series (each series has a number of episodes) of these – a real treat!

3. Pride and Prejudice : Gather around all you Austen fans! Here’s the book accurate version via the BBC. I really like the actress playing Elizabeth, Elizabeth Garvie – all sparkling eyes and impetuous temper; quite Lizzie-like!

4. Sherlock Holmes : I am not a big fan of Robert Downey Jr. , and I haven’t liked either of his Holmes movies. But I quite like Jeremy Brett. He is the Holmes I picture when I re-read any of Arthur Conan Doyle’s books, Downey but a hyped up (and branded up, if you will) version of the original. This is available to stream as individual episodes, each about 1.5 hours long.

5. Wives and Daughters : From the BBC/PBS stable comes this Masterpiece Theater series about a country doctor and his clear-hearted daughter Molly. In 4 tempestuous episodes.

Posted in All Netflix, foreign, lists, movies online, Netflix Recommendations, recommended, WhaTWON | 3 Comments

Movie Preview : Gangs of Wasseypur II

Oh, yes! Another film which won’t release in the US (imagine my joy)! Will I have to make a trip to India to see them 🙂 ?

Anyway, this releases 8th August in India, and features violent talk in polite UP-ite Hindi. No kidding.
(Caution : Below trailer has violence/colorful language).

Posted in 2012, drama, Previews, rating-R | Comments Off on Movie Preview : Gangs of Wasseypur II

What to watch on Netflix Instant : Edition #2

[amazon_link id=”B0007PALZ2″ target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]12 Monkeys (Special Edition)[/amazon_link]Yes, yes, I know! Another list of great Netflix Movies to see! Well, stop jumping for joy for a little while and read this :

1. 12 Monkeys (English) : I adore Bruce Willis, sci-fi and time travel scifi, in that order. This film has all three (and it has Brad Pitt :-)). Yes, it released in 1995, and those of you who missed it then should see it now. This is one of my all time sci-fi favorites!

2. Khamosh Pani (Hindi) : A story of the India-Pakistan partition and the horrendous ethnic riots that followed, told from a woman’s point of view. Full review.

3. Paan Singh Tomar (Hindi) : Based on a true life story this is an engaging look at the life of an athlete-turned-dacoit. Here’s the complete review.

4. Amreeka (Arabic) : A divorced Palestinian woman Muna and her son move to America to start their lives, away from fear, the threat of terror and political instability. A moving immigrant story, this is a good watch.

5. The Women on the 6th floor (French) : When I visited Paris, I saw these Parisian homes, large apartments I presumed by the number of people entering the main gates, which when shut, you couldn’t see through. This film is of families within such a home, where Jean-Louis Joubert, an affluent, stolid stock-broker lives with wife and children. By chance Joubert becomes friendly with the Spanish maids on the 6th floor which portends major changes in his life. Quite a lovely, whimsical watch.

Want more lists ? See this!

Posted in 2012, foreign, lists, mini-reviews, movies online, Netflix Recommendations, recommended, WhaTWON | Comments Off on What to watch on Netflix Instant : Edition #2

Movie Review : Madagascar 3

Rating : 2/5

This one is a snooze-fest for most adults. An over-the-top confection of noise, color and very little humor (for adults) this one is a pass unless you absolutely have to sit through it for the little ones. My little ones are not so little any longer, although they did want to see it. Post-movie they said they liked it and looked at least a little amused, so I’m guessing it still appealed.

Alex the lion (Ben Stiller), Marty the zebra (Chris Rock), Gloria the hippo (Jada Pinkett Smith) and Melman the giraffe (David Schwimmer) tire of Africa and long for the New York Central Park zoo. To get there they must join up with their penguin friends in Monte Carlo and make their way to New York by way of Europe. Along the way they find Inspector Chantel Dubois (Frances McDormand) in hot pursuit; she wants Alex’s head on her wall, and vows to hunt them down. The movie then is a psychedelic run through Europe where the animals join a circus, and smooth over rivalries with circus tiger Vitaly (Bryan Cranston) and make friends with sea-lion Stefano (Martin Short).

Animated films have come so far in their use of tech, that one is surprised at times with the amount of animation, sound and color that can burst upon the screen. And not all of it is good. Dreamworks productions almost always have their characters interesting and down pat – the expressions, the inflections and mannerisms are a pleasure to watch. However what this film lacks is good old story telling that keeps you bound to your seat. This is a predictable film, and you know where it is going – but sometimes these kinds of films work because of the nuanced portrayal on screen. Unfortunately this is not one of those films.

This film is mostly superficial; bright eye candy for the toddler film-goer, snooze time for the rest of us.

Posted in 2012, animation, english, family-friendly, hollywood, rating-G | 1 Comment

Movie Review : Cocktail

Rating : 3.5/5
Genre : Romantic Drama
Year : 2012
Running time : 2 hours 26 minutes
Director : Homi Adajania
Cast : Deepika Padukone, Saif Ali Khan, Diana Penty, Boman Irani, Randeep Hooda, Dimple Kapadia
Kid rating : PG-13

Bollywood prefers straightforward love stories – the “I love you, you love me” kind. Cocktail then is an unusual film by Bollywoodian standards because it a threesome (hence the subtle Cocktail :-)) and it is of the messy “I love you, you love her” kinds. Harder to make and gain acclaim for than the standard stuff, because this splits the audience into 2 camps : He-She1, and He-She2. Yes, harder to make and braver.

Cocktail reminded me of the Julia Roberts, Jude Law starrer Closer which was way messier because it was a foursome, who had their love lives tangled. Here good little Punjabi girl Meera (Diana) lands up in London bearing mangoes for her one true love, her husband Kunal (Randeep). Kunal, an A-grade opportunist cad dismisses her wifely claims and leaves her stranded in London, where she happens to meet sophisticated, hard-partying photographer Veronica D’Costa (Deepika). Veronica, seeing her plight takes her in, and helps her find her footing in London. They meet modern-day Casanova Gautam Kapoor (Saif) and Gautam shacks up with Veronica. Things start to get complicated when Gautam, in a no-commitment relationship with Veronica, begins to see Meera’s charms . . .

The first half of the film is breezy and filled with organic, irreverent humor, the kinds that is so common between good friends and that I only see in Farhan Akhtar films. Padukone and Penty are long, lean and beautiful and manage to light up each frame they’re in. Saif is suave enough to fit in. The characters are fleshed out just right and they behave consistently. Deepika steals the show as an outwardly confident, but inwardly insecure young woman who yearns to be accepted and loved. Saif is cast in a role which suits his personality, and appears charming enough although I couldn’t quite see him as the man Veronica describes him to be “I have never met anyone like him, and believe me I have met many men”.

Debutante Meera Penty appears unsure of herself (first film jitters ?). Her role requires her to be a god-fearing, mousy, religious sort, but she projects the same expression for every emotion, whether she is sad, regretful or anxious. Dimple Kapadia is miscast as the motherly Mrs. Kapoor – she appears neither Punjabi (bad accent) nor the typical orthodox mummy. I quite liked the easy affectionate mama-bhatija relationship between Gautam and his uncle (Boman Irani).

The film portrays society’s harsh reality for women quite well – you might be a tough, independent, alcohol-guzzling young woman, but when it comes to marriage and settling down, you must fill the mold of the good Indian girl, the one a guy can take home to mummy, the one as Veronica puts it “cooks biryani for her man with that yoghurt thing (raita)”. Gautam seems to echo that refrain when he admits that “mummy” knows best, so much so that she could see who would be right for him, when he couldn’t discern it himself. Deepika is quite fantastic as Veronica, lively and beautiful as the unafraid, modern, young woman, but needy and desperate in love, willing to change herself completely to keep hold of a man. One of the most effective shots in the film show a sad Veronica clad in a glittery, short dress, dancing amid a throng of people in a noisy, packed dance-club, but appearing quite lonely – it is as if she is the only one in an empty room. Out of the three main characters I felt the most for her – she moved me to tears, her best performance to date for sure.

Now this is romance, so we’d like to see some romantic sparks fly. And here is where I’m a little disappointed. Gautam and Veronica aren’t together because of an earth-shattering love, so fine – but apparently Gautam and Meera do feel for each other, yeah? So whither the love or the chemistry ? Unfortunately there is none, or none that I could see. Diana looks kind of plaintive in love, like she has a tooth ache, and I’m unimpressed by Saif’s voluble remonstrations of how hard love is. What is that he sees in her, or she him ? Why root for them ? How am I supposed to respond to the in-love pair when they don’t appear to be that much in love? Yeah, they say they are , but so what ? Unanswered questions all, and essentially what stops the film from getting a rating higher than 3.5 ; it fails to give us a reason to believe in – yes, it sounds corny – love!

The second half of the film turns serious, but does keep you interested. There is anger and betrayal, self-pity and desperation ; quite a difference from the fun-loving first half. Cocktail has some great dialogues, natural-sounding and realistic, and Deepika has some of the best lines, dripping anger and sarcasm and hurt all at once. The film boasts an impressive soundtrack; I quite liked “Tum hi ho bandhu”, “Daaru Desi”, “Jugni” and “Yaariyan”.

Even with it’s flaws, this is a well-made film. I’d expected better from writer Imtiaz Ali, but it is still a worth-while watch.

Kidwise : This film has a UA rating from the Censor Board, which is kind of equivalent to PG-13, and I agree with it. There is some heavy petting, kissing, allusions to sex, and skimpily dressed women; Deepika herself appears in a bikini – in which she looks fantastic. The tone and theme of the movie are mature, and probably won’t make sense to younger kids.

Posted in 2012, bollywood, drama, humor, rating-PG13, recommended, romance | 4 Comments

Movie Review : The Amazing Spiderman (2012)

Rating : 4/5
Year : 2012
Running time : 2 hours 16 minutes
Director : Marc Webb
Cast : Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Denis Leary, Martin Sheen, Sally Field Irrfan Khan, Rhys Ifans
Kid rating : PG-13

I wasn’t even going to see this film; does one need ANOTHER retelling of Spidey’s story ? As it happened, my alternate plans sank, and I accompanied the family – which included two very excited kids – to the theatre. (What is it about kids and super-heroes anyway ? Every super-hero film is an instant kid-magnet.) And, am I glad I did see the movie – it is the best Spiderman film of all!

At the risk of repeating old folklore – Peter Parker’s story is probably imprinted upon your brain for all I know – I will repeat if for those that have recently climbed out from under a rock : Peter is an orphan, and has been brought up by Uncle Ben and Aunt May following the demise of his parents. One fine day, Peter is bitten by a radioactive spider which gives him his spidey powers. Following an incident when a criminal kills Uncle Ben, Peter gradually adopts his Spiderman identity, complete with red and blue costume and mask, and fights criminals of all shape and form.

This film tweaks and modernizes the story a little. In the film Peter’s father Robert Parker is a scientist researching cross-breeding of species and dies in a plane crash. As a high-school teen with his own issues of loneliness and bullying, Peter finds his dead father’s research notes, and contacts his father’s friend and colleague Dr. Curt Connors (Rhys Ifans) . Connors now works for big corporation Oscorp, heading the research in cross-breeding, hoping to help humans find regenerative/healing powers. In Connors’s lab Peter is bitten by one of the test spiders, and this gives him superhuman strength and quick reflexes.

Following Uncle Ben’s death, for which Peter blames himself, he begins to use his powers to find Uncle Ben’s killer. Peter’s vendetta doesn’t end once he has found the killer; he begins to fight crime where he sees it, developing a costume to hide his boyish identity, and high-strength webbing from Oscorp research, truly making him the web-slinger of popular lore. Meanwhile Connors has used Robert Parker’s research to develop a formula to help regenerate body parts like the lizard. Under pressure from an ominous villain Rajit Ratha (Irrfan Khan in a 5 minute role) one armed Dr. Connors uses himself as a human guinea-pig hoping that the formula will help re-grow his lost arm. It does, but it also turns Connors into a giant, vicious, power-hungry lizard – a predator so powerful, none seem able to stop him . . .

We’ve had many, many retellings of Peter Parker’s origin tale. While the earlier movies starring Tobey McGuire were good in their own right, they seemed to focus on Spiderman vs. his newest nemesis. In the kerfuffle between the Spiderman brand, the busy, repetitive plotlines and the larger-than-life villains, those films lost Spiderman’s human essence. We forgot who and why Spidey was what he was, and why it was that we were supposed to care what became of him. In contrast, this film focuses on Spiderman’s story, making his troubles personal, his tragedies heartfelt, and his successes all the more resounding. I’ve rooted for this Spiderman as I never have for the others. He is the poor little super-hero; without his superhero persona a scrawny, much bullied high-school nerd, and an orphan to boot. And with such an under-dog (and it is odd, when you think about it, to refer to a super-hero as an under-dog), you want him to win.

Much of my fervor for the film stems from its well-developed characters and excellent acting. Gangly Andrew Garfield at 28, makes for an oldish high-schooler (although he is way more believable than 40-something, paunchy Bollywood heroes playing college boys) but is very appealing as the striving-to-be-responsible superhero. Sally Field makes for a sympathetic Aunt May and Martin Sheen is the epitome of a mature father figure (how did this reasonable looking man spawn Charlie ? 🙂 )

As I said, this film has been loosely adapted from the original comic. The Lizard-man is not a Marvel villain, rather he is a derivative of Doctor Octopus. In the original comic, Gwen Stacy and her father police chief George Stacy (Dennis Leary) appear in the Doctor Octopus episode; here they are worked into the fight against the Lizard-man. Rhys Ifans makes for a compelling villain, straddling the line between personal good and public welfare. Leary is a competent (if unseeing) police chief. Emma Stone plays Peter’s girlfriend Gwen Stacy, and carries off the beauty-with-brains persona very well, and Stone and Garfield have great romantic chemistry.

There are a few oddities given that the Doctor Octopus episode appeared in the 1960s and in this film is set in the 2000s. So, while Peter has a high-tech phone and computer gadgetry in his room, and Oscorp specializes in ground-breaking research with the help of modern technology, Uncle Ben and Aunt May seem to live in a curiously old-fashioned world. Also with the in-your-face, 24×7 news broadcasts of the modern world, it is a little inconceivable that Captain Stacy should still believe that Spidey is the villain. And what to make of Gwen’s style of dressing (miniskirts with thigh-high tights)? A throwback to the 60s or the fashion sense of a teenager?

The Amazing Spiderman comes to us via director Marc Webbs – he of “500 days of summer” fame – a film I didn’t quite like, although it does have its moments. You wouldn’t think that a superhero film would be up his alley, but he does good here. A great mix of super-heroics and good old-fashioned story-telling, this is a must-see film. Highly recommended.

Posted in 2012, english, hollywood, rating-PG13, recommended | 1 Comment