Really. I am.
Not the white, wooly kinds; I am a filmi LAMB.
We tweet, as opposed to bleat.
Poetic, no ? 🙂 – take a look!
Really. I am.
Not the white, wooly kinds; I am a filmi LAMB.
We tweet, as opposed to bleat.
Poetic, no ? 🙂 – take a look!
Ah! Another film I’m looking forward too. And there are many reasons – there’s Shahid Kapoor and Sonam as the lead pair, and they have great chemistry together. Then there’s the director – Shahid’s dad Pankaj Kapur (of Office Office fame), who is himself a very accomplished actor, so I am expecting great things from him. AND then there is Shahid’s step-mom, Supriya Pathak (Shahid’s mother is TV/film actress Neelima Azeem), who is another fantastic actress.
Here’s a lovely song from the film (Rabba Mein Toh) – and yes, incase you see the yellow mustard fields, parts of the film were shot in Switzerland :
Simi Garewal is back on the small screen again with her new show “Simi Selects India’s Most Desirable”. In it she interviews the “hot and single = desirable” people of Bollywood. Apparently she will diversify beyond Bollywood but that hasn’t happened yet. Garewal has tried the talk show thing a few times now, with her most recent attempt before “Simi Selects” being on “Rendezvous with Simi Garewal”, but her shows have never really taken off. If you watch any of them you’ll see why; the lady has neither wit nor chutzpah, or even the very basic gift of the gab. Well, “Simi Selects” is no different. Touted by the lady to be different (she is the writer/producer), the show is the same old annoying stuff in the same old bottle. Plus, Simi’s gotten way more cheesier (if that’s possible).
On the first installment she had on Ranbir Kapoor – and you can’t get more established than that. Ranbir of the famous Kapoor clan is the current happening star; every alternate film stars him. Plus he was linked with the very lissome Ms. Padukone. The love story did not have a happy ending, Deepika hinting in public interviews that it was because of Ranbir’s infidelity.
Anyway, Ranbir came on, was feted and praised by Ms. Garewal for being so handsome, and desirable and such a good boy. Yeah, then she showed snippets of his Mom Neetu and Dad Rishi and they said pretty much the same: such a great son, a sensitive little boy . . . blah, blah, blah. Simi fawned on, and oohed and aahed at the right moments. Ranbir, to his credit took it all in stride, and behaved really nicely with Simi Aunty. I’m lucky that the show ended when it did; had it gone on any longer and heaped any more praises on Ranbir, I might have had to build him his very own temple.
After I watched that, I haven’t really cared to tune into any other editions of her show, but I did see the show yesterday after I saw an ad. which showed her featuring one of my favorite actors – Abhay Deol. Abhay picks interesting films to work in, notably Manorama Six Feet Under, DevD and Socha na tha. He was also in Aisha and the very recent “Zindagi na milegi dobara”. So his choices are very different from what one would expect out of a Deol boy.
Sunny, the eldest brother was quite the star, but mostly acted in commercial projects. Bobby, his younger brother hasn’t veered off that course much. Abhay, the youngest, has picked a very different path, doing mostly hatke films – so figured he’d be very un-Deol-like. Which he was. He was also very rad, and a tad eccentric, which I hadn’t expected at all.
This show was very much like the previous. Simi was in full form, with the fawning and the overarching plaudits, although I daresay that they were better deserved here rather than in Ranbir’s case. Then, in case you missed this, she also did her “Minefield” section, where she judges the contestant’s shit-taking abilities by role-playing with them. She assumes the role of Kiki, the most annoying girlfriend in the entire world (in my view) and then proceeds to have Kiki talk like a mentally challenged child, lisping her words together, and batting her eyelashes like she thinks an annoying girlfriend would do. She did this to Ranbir too, and after watching her Kiki-playing abilities, I’ve got to say that Ranbir and Abhay tolerated her a lot better than I did.
Garewal is 64, and she looks very good for 64. It is another story that she hasn’t gotten any better with her television show-hosting capabilities with age.
Rating : 2/5
Genre : Drama
Year : 2011
Running time : 2 hours 10 minutes
Director : Vishal Bharadwaj
Cast : Priyanka Chopra, Naseeruddin Shah, John Abraham, Annu Kapoor, Irfan Khan, Usha Uthup
Kid rating : PG-15
7 KHOON MAAF : NO FORGIVENESS FOR THIS PECULIAR FILM !
Although Vishal Bharadwaj is a certified genius when it comes to making films, I’ve got to say that Saat Khoon Maaf was a peculiar film. It weirded me out, and not in an interesting way.
As the title says, it’s about 7 murders, all by one person. The person in question is mild-looking and very pretty Susanna, the product of an Anglo-Indian household, in what I gathered was some Goa-like town. Susanna is searching for true love, and she finds it 7 times. Unfortunately, familiarity breeds contempt, and none of the husbands can live upto their initial promise(s). Susanna of course dispatches them to the other world once she is done with each of them.
The film is Susanna’s – it’s her life and her problems. The men just flit in and out. Susanna lives on unperturbed, surrounded by her helpful and fawning, aged servants. For them “Saheb”, as she is fondly called, can do no wrong. And even though she’s a murderess, and mentally unhinged, even if not palpably so, you don’t think of her as an evil, feral force – she’s just Susanna. A bad situation, a bad egg – what to do ? Susanna had no choice – poor thing.
The seven husbands are quite different from each other. From the almost-Anglo army officer Major Rodrigues(Neil Nitin Mukesh) to the rock singer Jamshed Singh Rathod (John Abraham) to the Kashmiri shairi-spouting poet (Irfan Khan) Susanna can certainly pick them. There is also the Russian diplomat, the salivating police-walla Keemat (Annu Kapoor), the naturopathy doctor Modhusudan Tarafdar (Naseeruddin Shah) who fall for Susanna. All have different professions, native tongues and cultures, but Susanna is supple like quick-silver; she changes herself to suit them. Until she can change no more.
Acting wise, all seven were well-portrayed, and Priyanka is nutty Susanna all the way. I was quite surprised to see singer Usha Uthup do a remarkable job as Susanna’s mother-like, portly maid. And author Ruskin Bond, who’s story this film is based upon appears in a cameo as the priest.
The mood of the film is macabre. It is populated by weird looking characters, which gives the film a surreal feel. It’s all rather black and white; there are very few shades of grey. The characters are all, each in their own way, eccentric and abnormal, in not being able to find a balance as regular folk would do. Eccentricity is doable but in small doses. Large helpings like this push the film over the edge.
The film might have a unique angle to it, but it’s not very interesting. Why is Susanna worth watching ? What makes this film worth watching ? I did not care too much about Susanna or her seven husbands. If there was pathos in Susanna’s search for true love (and I thought that was what Bharadwaj was going for), I did not see it. If we were meant to nod our heads in silent sympathy to one poor soul (and so what if she’s nuts ?) looking for happiness, I’m not sure I got the memo. And the number game – whew ! Seven really ? After a while it grew dreary, and you were waiting for the seven husbands to show up (3 down, 4 to go . . .) so you could finish the movie and be done with it – reminded me of “What’s your Rashee ?”. Plus the film has a really wimpy ending.
This is an agonizing film, with a weak plotline and unredeemable characters – you cannot root for them; you can barely watch them. The ending is a cop-out ; I haven’t read the original story, but if it worked in prose, it definitely does not work on film. The music is slow and lilting in keeping with the mood of the film – Bekaraan is the only number I actually liked. Priyanka for all for her star power, and the other worthy veteran actors, cannot float this sinking boat. Avoid this one.
Rating : 4/5
Genre : Drama
Year : 2011
Running time : 2 hours
Director : Krishna D.K., Raj Nidimoru
Cast : Tushar Kapoor, Sendhil Ramamurthy, Sundeep Kishan, Radhika Apte, Zakir Hussain, Pitobash Tripathy, Nikhil Dwivedi, Preeti Desai, Amit Mistry, Girija Oak
Kid rating : PG-13
SHOR IN THE CITY : CRIME IN MAXIMUM CITY !
I have seen a couple of Tushar Kapoor’s films and am mostly unimpressed by them. So when I heard about “Shor in the city” produced by his sister, Ekta Queen-of-the-soap-opera Kapoor, I surmised that the two together couldn’t have come with anything fancy either. But I was wrong. And I am glad I was wrong because I got to see a pretty good film in the bargain.
“Shor in the city” is a pretty hatke film from the directors of the entertaining 99. It is about maximum city Mumbai, and the people that call it their home. This superb film is not the traditional single hero/heroine venture, but features three narratives running in parallel. All three stories meld together during the Ganesh Chaturthi festival celebrations. So there are small-time conmen like Tilak (Tusshar), who has a business of mass copying books and selling cheap copies of them at streetlights, and then there are people like Abhay (Sendhil Ramamurthy), an American of Indian origin who is looking to set up a business in Mumbai. Among the cast of characters there is also Sawan Murthy, a cricketer in love with the game and dreaming of making the Indian National Team.
Tilak is a bonafide Mumbai resident used to the fetid, corrupt mess that is the city. Aiming to take his illegal copying business further Tilak has come up with a plan and it involves a new book, the book’s author and kidnapping. Abhay, a US returned desi is used to fair play. When threatened by Mumbai’s underbelly, he must decide whether he wants to cave-in to their unjust demands or brazen it out. Sawan our young cricketeer has a lot of people to please. His girlfriend Shamli, is on the brink of marrying another man, because Sawan has been so unsuccesful at his suit and his career. His career is at the mercy of corrupt selectors, who demand that their palms be greased. What will it be for Sawan : his ideals, his life or a possible bank heist?
This dark film succeeds like it does because of it’s off-beat, but well-structured story, wonderful characterization, delectable acting and tight pace. I cannot say enough of it’s wonderful actors. Firstly – Tusshar Kapoor can act!! What a revelation! I am pleasantly surprised to actually see him emote instead of grunting through his roles. As the Coelho-loving goon Tilak, Kapoor was impressive.Tilak’s wilder, risk-taking friends are Ramesh, and Mandook played by Nikhil Dwivedi and Pitobash Tripathi respectively. Both do an excellent job, especially Tripathy who brings to his character that extra edge as the eccentric and border-line nutty Mandook. Radhika Apte plays Tilak’s wife Sapna with the hesitant grace and tremulousness of a new bride. Another strong female actress is Preeti Desai who plays Shamli, Sawan’s almost-lost love, fending off her middle-class suitors in hopes of her knight in shining armor riding through.
Sendhil Ramamurthy (of Heroes fame) as Abhay, fits right into the storyline as the desi who’s returned to his own land only to fall into the clutches of corrupt goons hand in glove with the police. The villains of Abhay’s story are the hafta-demanding goons. Suresh Dubey is the leering Hemraj – he smiles as he threatens, and remains menacing even when her grins. And Zakir hussain is the cold Premal. If it were not for the sheer fineness with which Hussain and Dubey portray the vicious, omnipresent underbelly of Mumbai, SITC would have lost much of it’s desperate edge. Amit Mistry is fantastic as Tipu-bhai, the fixer who has his corrupt finger in every illegal pie.
Genre wise I would classify “SITC” as a crime thriller but it does have it’s moments of humor, like when during the bank robbery, Tilak declares that he is there only for “moral support”. A great mix of noir, high drama, pathos and thrills, SITC is one of the best films of the year. And I say it now even though we are only halfway through 2011- this one goes straight to my Top Ten List.
I was floored by this unexpected gem of a film – make sure you see it.
Genre : Documentary
Year : 2009
Running time : 1 hour
Director : Deepa Bhatia
A quarter of a million Indian farmers have committed suicide since 1995. Sound shocking ? Well, I’m not making this stuff up – this is still happening, in present day “shining” India. And this is the subject of Deepa Bhatia’s documentary “Nero’s Guests”, which I happened to watch via the NDTV Documentary series. In it, Bhatia and her crew follow around P. Sainath as he visits and documents the conditions of the farming community in Maharashtra.
Sainath, along with being the Rural Affairs Editor for The Hindu is also the recipient of the Ramon B. Magsaysay Award (sometimes called the Asian Nobel) for Journalism. Sainath reports widely on marginalized sections of society and his writing has appeared on India Together besides the Hindu.
In “Nero’s Guests”, which is presumably so named because of the the legend in which Emperor Nero burnt his guests for light, Sainath is  the heartfelt and vociferous voice for the marginalized farmers, and brings to attention the agrarian crisis in modern India. In the film, Sainath visits many of the affected areas, and you see him talk to the farmers and document their woes . He also talks directly to the camera, presumably at his home, where he brings from his documents photos of the people who have passed.
One is affected as you see him talk of hapless folk like the woman farmer who committed suicide, and whose family was ineligible for compensation from the government because the state did not recognize females as farmers – women could only be the wives, mother, sisters or daughters of male farmers. He tells us, as he shows us a photograph of a mother and son, of the emptiness in the boy’s eyes after the father has committed suicide.  He talks of the feeling of humiliation and helplessness he feels  when he faces desperate farmers and knows that there is nothing that he can do to alleviate their troubles. And he tells with visible emotion of the cold hard fact that when he meets family members of a deceased farmer he can see that they are planning the same fate for themselves. Such is the desperation.
India’s farmers are a poor lot. In this film they relate their woes. With the cost of farming having gone up and the returns paltry in comparison farmers find it hard to make ends meet, and are often indebted to corrupt moneylenders. With debt multiplying (farmers in the film talk of debts of 2 lakh rupees, about $4000) and no ray of hope in sight farmers are committing suicide. In the film, Sainath visits a local village hospital and while he is there, two men bring in a third who is violently throwing up. As the camera follows the three into the dark, dank, dismal looking hospital building, we are told that the man has swallowed pesticide.
This is an important film, and it tells an important tale. Well-directed, this film gives us news that the mainstream media deems unfit to report on. “Nero’s Guests” is a must-see. Kudos to Bhatia and Sainath !
Awkward to fall in love with your brother’s to-be bride? You think? Yeah, well that’s the premise of this YashRaj production which hits theatres in September. The film features Imran Khan, Katrina Kaif, and Ali Zafar (of Tere bin Laden fame). It seems a tad overdone from the trailer, but I hope it makes more sense than it appears to; I would really like to see YRF back to producing quality films:
Once upon a time I was a Blockbuster subscriber. I received DVDs in the mail, and then went over to the physical Blockbuster store (a 10 minute drive) to exchange them for free. I remained a Blockbuster subscriber for a pretty long time. Then Blockbuster raised their rates. I canceled my Blockbuster subscription and got Netflix, and a Netflix compatible Blu-ray player. I’ve remained with Netflix ever since.
There is not a moral to that story – in case you were looking; raising rates does not immediately get you booted. It is only when you think that the price does not deliver the goods that it promises, that it does. Today I received an email from Netflix. It said :
We are separating unlimited DVDs by mail and unlimited streaming into two separate plans to better reflect the costs of each. Now our members have a choice: a streaming only plan, a DVD only plan, or both.
Your current $11.99 a month membership for unlimited streaming and unlimited DVDs (including Blu-ray access) will be split into 2 distinct plans:
Plan 1: Unlimited Streaming (no DVDs) for $7.99 a month
Plan 2: Unlimited DVDs (including Blu-ray), 1 out at-a-time (no streaming)
for $9.99 a monthYour price for getting both of these plans will be $17.98 a month ($7.99 + $9.99). You don’t need to do anything to continue your memberships for both unlimited streaming and unlimited DVDs.
These prices will start for charges on or after September 1, 2011.
So, here’s the backstory. Netflix had a plan that allowed you to rent DVDs by mail, and stream films for $9.99. I paid $2 extra since my mail-in plan had the Blu-ray option. Still, $11.99 to get DVDs by mail (one at a time) and have hundreds of films at your finger-tips, via streaming, was a no-brainer. Now that Netflix is separating it’s plans, you are forced to choose one or pay a premium if you want both.
In my case, I will now have to pay $17.98 (+tax) if I want the service that I had before : $10 for Blu-ray by-mail rentals, and $8 for streaming. Me thinks Netflix is trying to get out of the DVD business and concentrate on the streaming alone. Redbox kiosks charge $1 for movie rentals/day ($1.50 for blu-ray), and get the film faster than Netflix. Over the past year or so, Redbox kiosk locations have tripled and a few more wouldn’t hurt.
So, the upshot of all this is that I will probably keep my streaming service (and hope that Netflix provides more content on it) but get rid of my mail-in service. In all fairness I’ve got to say that Netflix service is pretty good. I don’t have empirical data, but on the whole Netflix turnaround times are pretty fast ( faster than Blockbuster was). I mail in a movie today, and the new movie is mailed out the day-after – a 2 day turn-around. So I mail-out Monday morning and go check the mail on Thursday evening and the red envelope is in there – not bad, yeah ?
And yes, the streaming films are not in hi-def, but they are pretty close to DVD quality. Netflix’s selection is large when it comes to streaming desi films, from Sanjeev Kumar’s classic “Mausam”, to the Sonam starrer Delhi-6, to the newer “Dhobi Ghat” – way more than any desi video store would ever get you. Plus they have the esoteric titles like say, “Loins of Punjab presents”. Try asking for that at a desi video store; they look at you perplexed, and one of them even told me that they didn’t carry documentaries e.g.; “Lions of Punjab”. Being the ardent movie-watcher that I am, with streaming I have the opportunity to watch gorgeous foreign films like “Bread and Tulips”, or discover fantastic titles like “Moon”. Streaming is wonderful and is all set to be the future and I can’t tell you how happy that makes me.
Today’s price hike has irked a number of Netflix subscribers, most of them venting their ire on Netflix’s blog or Facebook page. #DearNetflix is a trending topic on Twitter. Now, Netflix is a money-making concern not a charity, so I’m assuming that this is the way they look to make profits. It is up to me as a subscriber to decide whether I want to spend my money on them or on Blockbuster or on Hulu or on Amazon Prime. Plain economics really. Price it too high and not deliver enough value for the money, and you lose people. Price it too low and go out of business.
Still, I must say that Netflix needs to work on it’s PR. To announce a 60% price hike all in one day ? Really ? How bad does a 60% increase look printed across headlines in most newspapers and information websites, and have angry subscribers announce (to the world) that they are going to quit come September ? Talk about negative press! If you have to go up, how about 30% spaced out by 6 months? Or how about introducing a hybrid plan in addition to the 2 separate plans ?
I’m not sure what the head honchos at Netflix are planning but I sure hope that they get a larger movie database on streaming, and find a way to get hi-def on it too. One would appreciate it if a quality movie rental service remained that way.