An ode to fallen films

I interrupt regular programming to bring to you an ode. It’s an inspired ode. It’s a song, which describes the condition of our fallen films. I currently have no reviews to pen unless I make a trek into memory-land, since can’t go and see the new releases for fear of losing my mind. And it’s not like I haven’t suffered enough for this year – I did see Partner AND Apne, both within 30 days of each other, which somewhat increased the trauma.

After the disastrous reviews of “Laaga chunari mein daag” which I was eagerly anticipating, I seem to be losing my in-born, child-like trust in humanity. My list of Worst films of 2007 is getting very long – how will I pare it down ? I despair of having 10 films to make the list of Best films of 2007. One breaks into a cold sweat.

Anyway, here’s the ode.

Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
And another one gone, and another one gone
Another one bites the dust
Hey, I’m gonna get you too
Another one bites the dust

Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
There are plenty of ways you can hurt a man
And bring him to the ground
You can beat him
You can cheat him
You can treat him to a desi film
When he’s down
But I’m ready, yes I’m ready for you
I’m standing on my own two feet
Out of the doorway the movies rip
Repeating the sound of the beat

Posted in bollywood | 8 Comments

“Om Shanti Om” vs. Saawariya

oso

2007’s been such a slow year for films. I can count the number of decent movies on my fingers. Which is what makes me wait with bated breath for the Oct. 12th release of “Laga chunari mein daag”. And then ofcourse come the mega-movies OSO and Saawariya. Both release on the same day, so with all the hype going around, votes are split on which will better the other. The writers at PlanetBollywood (including yours truly) had a discussion on this, the results of which are presented in this article.

Me, I’m going to watch OSO first.

Posted in bollywood | 1 Comment

Review : Everybody says I’m fine

esif

Rating : Above average (3.7/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2001
Running time : 1 hr and 40 minutes
Director : Rahul Bose
Cast : Rehaan Engineer, Pooja Bhatt, Koel Purie, Boman Irani, Anahita Ueroi, Rahul Bose, Sharokh Bharucha, Junelia Aguilar

EVERYBODY SAYS I’M FINE (ESIF) : INTERESTING !

This film is directed by Rahul Bose, and he acts in it too. In the first half I was inclined to dismiss him as a director, because the film had a surreal, psychedelic, disjointed quality to it, as though shot by an amateur. No sophistication, no smoothening over awkward moments, just the bald truth put out very crudely. Like someone was shooting a home movie. However it gets better, so a large dose of patience is in order.

The story is a little surreal too – it’s about a popular hair-dresser to the richie-rich (who else actually goes in for Rs.1100 trims ?) Xen who after a traumatic childhood experience, is able to listen to people’s thoughts. Not always though, but only when he’s connected to them – like when he’s cutting their hair.

Now Xen, who’s also the owner of the beauty salon where he cuts hair, is a very, very nice guy, to the point where I’m thinking – how can such a nice guy actually run a successful business ? So he treats his co-workers very well, is welcoming to all his patrons (although he can hear all their sordid thoughts) and is a do-gooder kind of a guy. So, when he knows a person is in trouble, he does what he can to help. You’d think hearing everyone’s anguish and filth would be troubling for oneself, yeah ? Apparently for Xen too, who in his apartment above the salon, has the TV switched on but forever on mute, lives very quietly, and seems to have hardly any friends or life besides his work.

Into this odd life comes Nikita. She’s come to have a hair-cut but when Xen cuts her hair, much to his surprise he can’t hear a thing. It’s like she has no thoughts ! Xen is attracted to Nikita, but soon discovers that she’s plagued by her own demons . . .

The film seemed to come together as time went by, and Bose actually managed to cobble together some quite poignant scenes. The film’s characters seemed a little angular, as in not well-rounded or well-fleshed out, probably because we see them only in the hair salon or in close proximity to it. The outside world is kind of shut out, which it can’t possibly be – not in India, where noises and smells of your surroundings (however posh they might be) come seeping in. The main protagonist Rehan Engineer, seemed a little wooden-faced but did OK, while Brit-desi Koel Puri playing Nikita, just about managed. Some of the other characters – Tanya, a rich socialite having trouble in her marital home, was well portrayed by Pooja Bhatt. And Boman Irani had a small part – that of Mr. Mittal, which he as usual was immaculate in.

An interesting film, this is primarily in English, with a smattering of Hindi (Hinglish if you please). It is pretty adult-themed, ie; topics unsuitable for children. ESIF is also very stylistically shot, and may not appeal to viewers looking for a “traditional” film. It has an interesting story to tell though, so if you arm yourself with some patience and forbearance, you might actually like this one.

Posted in bollywood, rating-PG13 | 4 Comments

Review : The Namesake

namesake

Rating : Good (4/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2006
Running time : 2 hours
Director : Mira Nair
Cast : Tabu, Irfan Khan, Kal Penn, Zuleikha Robinson, Jacinda Barrett

THE NAMESAKE : HEART-FELT

I haven’t read “The Namesake”, the book upon which this film is based. I found it slow and ponderous, and so very “Bengali” that I couldn’t identify with it. I had to give it up mid-way. The film however, gets rid of the slow-paced bits, and makes the “Bengaliness” more like “desi-ness”, which isn’t hard to identify with.

The film is about Ashoke and Ashima Ganguli, a Bengali couple, who move to the States, because of Ashoke’s job. Ashoke has come to the US of his own accord, but Ashima, though prepared to follow her husband, is the true immigrant, uprooted from the culture, society and family she is so very firmly entrenched in, back home. Once in her husband’s apartment in cold New York, Ashima learns new ways, and fashions her life around her family (a son and a daughter are born to them). The film moves forward with the kids growing up, and their apparent estrangement with the ways of their parents.

One imagines Ashoke and Ashima to be in an older age-group; Lahiri probably based her characters on adults her parents’ age. A generation back they were few desis and fewer desi-specific facilities (desi shops, restaurants, movie-theatres). It isn’t I imagine, like today, where in bigger cities, 24×7 desi radio stations are aplenty and you could just as easily see a Hindi film in a theatre, as you could the latest “Bourne Ultimatum”. I wasn’t born in the States, but much like Ashima moved here with my husband, which means that inspite of the generation gap, I sort of see Ashima’s view-point. And it’s not hard to roll back the years a little and see life as it may have been, and in your mind sympathise with Ashoke and Ashima as their values from back home conflict with the ones their kids assimilate from the society around them.

Friends told me that the film is depressing. I didn’t find it so. There are ups-and-downs in the film, tragedies and moments of happiness sprinkled through, but where in reality do you find anything different ? I choose to look at the film as one on coming to be at peace with yourself, you culture and your identity. Whereas Ashoke and Ashima have come to live permanently in their adopted country, they already have very well-developed identities, strong notions of culture, and know how and where they fit in. It is Gogol (and sister Sonia’s) struggle with their cross-cultural status, which is the focal point of the film.

The film is quite short, and that keeps it one the straight and narrow; indulgent forays into details (such as the book has) could have derailed it. The story is well-knit, the direction crisp, and the screen-play deft. Nair could not have chosen a better set of actors that Tabu and Irfan Khan to play Ashima and Ashoke respectively. Although Tabu doesn’t look very Bengali, she still manages to essay her role very well. And Khan plays Ashoke’s character with a vulnerability, which reminds me of my parents (it might remind you of yours). The scene with him at the airport bidding goodbye to Ashima as he heads off to another city for 6 months, renders the relationship between husband and wife beautifully.

Our very own Kalpen bhai (Kal Penn), as Gogol, does quite well too. Zuleikha Robinson plays Gogol’s love interest with panache. The cast also features a whole set of plentiful Mashis (apparently Lahiri played one of them, but was unable to locate her) and lots of relatives in India, all well-cast and realistic looking.

The film portrays both sides of the culture-conflict – that of the parents, and the other of Gogol (and the youngsters). It doesn’t take sides, doesn’t get preachy or moralistic on us, which garners it big-time brownie points from me. Gogol roams around carrying his awkward name and the cultural baggage his desi upbringing begets him, all the while trying to shrug it off and fit in with the society he sees around him. Ultimately it’s a question of culture and identity, and of Gogol finding his. But I also liked the fact that the film brought to the fore the fact that morality and culture are a state of mind, and just because people share your skin color doesn’t mean they were meant to be your soul-mates.

Posted in bollywood, drama, recommended | 7 Comments

Mini-reviews : Films I must mention

I normally never do this folks, but I’m writing this because these are just absolutely wonderful films, and worth watching. This is kind of inspiring me to do a whole my-favorite-oldie list, but that’s another post. Now these movies – they are old-old films, but quite fantastic, and come to mind now because I read about them on other filmi blogs. All these films I saw via good old DoorDarshan, so they are atleast 15 years old. The regional ones, I saw subtitled, via DD’s Sat/Sun regional film slot (saw quite a few very good films that way), but I keep forgetting their names. Out of the 4 below 1 is missing a name, so if anyone has a clue, please let me know. Anyway they are :

1. Swami (1977) :

swami
This film has been discussed in quite a bit of detail at FilmiGeek, and it’s about a young intellectual woman, who has a half-serious affair – more of an attachment really with a young visitor (Vikram – anyone remember “Julie” ?), but is married off to an older widower (Girish Karnad). Although this film held some regressive views on a woman’s place in society (ideally married and a home-maker – what use books, etc.), I thought the character of her husband was remarkable, since it portrayed a man not emasculated by his wife’s sexuality.

2. Main zinda hoon (1988) :

zinda1
Dicussed at Yves’s blog, this one’s kind of a stark look at a the life of a newly-wed wife, deserted by her husband (we don’t know why), and his sudden reappearance, after she has built up a life on her own. This is one the films you don’t easily forget, because it reflects societal expectations from a woman, and quite brutally shows you the truth behind the we-are-so-liberal facade. Deepti Naval plays the main character.

3. Sutradhar : This Marathi film (thanks to commenter Hareesh for giving me the name of the film) starred Smita Patil and Nana Patekar. Patekar played the role of a right-thinking political activist who wants to work for the people. He slowly gets corrupted as he becomes a minister and gets more and more entrenched into the political system. Patil played his just-as-idealistic young wife, who sees the changes in him and cannot bear to see everything she loved in this man get corrupted. It’s quite something watching Patil’s love for her husband turn into something resembling revulsion and distaste, until she decides she can take it no more.

4. Veedu (house) (1988) : Archana starred in this Tamil film (thanks to commenter Ravi for giving me the name of this film). The story is of this middle-class young girl, Sudha, a clerk in Chennai, who has a younger sibling, and a retired grand-father, and no familial support to speak of. She saves up and dreams of building a home for herself, and finally buys some land, and starts construction. When the home is built – it takes a toll emotionally and financially, since she’s battling corruption and other problems, she finds out that the land was reserved for some purpose or other, and her house couldn’t be built there in the first place. The film ends there, but as it finishes, you know that the Sudha’s journey hasn’t. She still has battles to fight, and you are with her commiserating, and wishing her an easier life.

Posted in bollywood, recommended | 7 Comments

Review : The Blue Umbrella

blue_umb2

Rating : Above average(3.6/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2005
Running time : 1 hr and 30 minutes
Director : Vishal Bharadwaj
Cast : Pankaj Kapoor, Shreya Sharma

THE BLUE UMBRELLA : CAPTIVATING !

I remember reading Ruskin Bond’s “A Flight of pigeons” many years ago, and being totally immersed in the story. The film which was based upon it, “Junoon”, was also one of the better films of that decade. Bond also wrote the “Blue Umbrella” and although the two are very different stories, both still contain the unmistakable flavor of India, the realism, and the attention to detail, that characterizes Bond’s work.

The Blue Umbrella is set in the foothills of Himachal – beautiful leafy green broad plains, and hills and valleys where sheep graze. Life is lazy, the world is small, and peppered with tourists. In this small world, or village, however you choose to see it, lives Nandkishor, a tea-seller with a small shack on the street. Avaricious and tight-fisted, old Nandu covets the beautiful things he sees. He sells small eatables and toffees to the kids of the village on credit, and in return confiscates their beloved possessions. So when Biniya, a little girl from the village obtains a bright blue Japanese umbrella from some tourists in exchange for her bear-claw locket, Nandkishor immediately desires it. And he is not the only one – the local school-teacher’s wife Lilavati (she prefers Lily) wants it too.

Biniya however loves her blue umbrella and takes it everywhere with her. She won’t even think of parting with it, even when Nandkishore offers her tempting sweets and other goodies. One day as Biniya is herding her flock of sheep, she sets down her umbrella nearby and cannot find it later. She is bereft. Everyone professes ignorance; they even come console Biniya, but she is suspicious of Nandkishore . . .

This is a slow tale, built from the lives and situations of a specific group of people. It dwells on one happening – that of the theft of Biniya’s prized umbrella. And this theft, takes on momentous proportions; the entire film hinges on it. So well is the atmosphere of the film built up, that it seems quite natural that a blue umbrella should be the talk of the town, getting envious glances everywhere it goes with it’s proud owner. The film is very attuned to the story – they both share the same languorous gait; lots of little asides where we see hopping, skipping children, singing songs and generally frolicking. Things move slowly, and one gets the feeling that life takes it’s own lazy way around the village.

The characters have also been sketched out believably. Pankaj Kapoor, attired in his grimy sleeveless sweater and kurta-pyjama, is quite apt as the old, capricious Nandkishore. As expected, acting-wise he does an immaculate job . Little Shreya Sharma as the long-haired, salwar-kameez clad Biniya deserves accolades for her acting, since she portrays Biniya’s innocence and smarts very well. Even the smaller roles have been developed very well; Biniya has a believable mother who scolds her for exchanging her bear-claw locket, and a protective older brother.

This is touted to be a children’s film, but I would qualify it further by saying that this is film for older children – those that will appreciate the tumult caused by the loss of one’s prized possessions, and the symbolic play of greed and covetousness. Plus the slow pace of the film will not hold a young one’s attention for long. And in this age of instant gratification, it’s a little hard to expect little kids to appreciate Biniya’s happiness in life’s little pleasures (One wishes it were so). Older kids might (my older kid did) but that’s not a given. This film’s story if taken literally is quite dated and/or rural – prized possessions for most urban kids are not umbrellas. However the umbrella is symbolically significant, and it might only be an older child or adult who can decipher that.

This film was quite an interesting watch, in it’s look at desire and greed. Desire dwells everywhere, even in the heart of an old, spent, tea-vendor in a non-descript village. I would never have thought Bond’s short story as adequate fodder for a feature film, but in Bharadwaj’s talented hands, this story comes to life. It’s a simple tale told honestly, sans the usual vulgarity and melodrama, and well-worth the watch.

Posted in bollywood, drama, family-friendly, recommended | 2 Comments

Review : Gandhi my father

Note : The edited version of this review appears at Planet Bollywood, here.

Rating : Above average (3.7/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2007
Running time : 2 hours 17 minutes
Cast : Darshan Jariwala, Akshaye Khanna, Shefali Shah, Bhoomika Chawla
Director : Feroze Abbas Khan

GANDHI MY FATHER : SENSITIVELY DONE !

It was with curiosity that I went to see this film – it’s not your usual Friday night entertainer. Much has been speculated about Gandhi’s personal life, and his tumultuous relationship with his son Harilal. I am actually amazed (and quite pleased) that someone in Bollywood would take up such a subject, because frankly we desis tend to revere our Mahatmas, and refuse to listen to any criticism of them. Thus although the film laud’s Gandhi’s role in the freedom struggle, he doesn’t come out quite as clean in his personal relationships.

The film is sort of biographical in nature, since it starts when we see a bedraggled Harilal Gandhi (the eldest of his sons) brought to a hospital in a semi-conscious state. Taken for a beggar with his matted locks and unkempt state, his assertion that he is Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi’s son is taken with a grain of salt. The film traces back Harilal’s life from his youth up till the present day, and in the process we see Gandhi’s family life, the roots of his activism, and his personal beliefs as they affected Harilal and the rest of the family.

When the film starts off Gandhi is a young barrister in South Africa, living there with Kasturba and four of his children. His eldest son Harilal is in India, planning to marry his fiancée Gulab (Bhumika). Gandhi, upset at the early date of the union (he himself has gotten Harilal engaged 4 years ago), resolves to cut himself off from Harilal. He softens later on when Harilal comes to S.Africa to assist him, but still wants Harilal to remain entrenched in grass-roots activism instead of going on to London for further education – something which Harilal dearly desires. The film later dwells upon the (almost philosophical) rift between Gandhi and Harilal, Harilal’s attempts to do his own thing, achieve his independence, and break away from his father’s name and influence.

And what an influence ! Gandhi is the beacon of light, the others are merely fire-flies fluttering around, blinded. Seen as a frail man, Gandhi appears to be civility personified. However in his personal relationships, polite and soft-spoken as ever, he is a stern and harsh task-master. As seen in the film, his family lives by his ideals, whether they like it or not. Fair to a fault, Gandhi treats all as equal, be they his family members or outsiders, and this leads to ruffled feelings. Understandably Baa who witnesses Gandhi’s behavior towards her children, is torn between her loyalty towards her husband, and compassion for her kids. Harilal, the only child to express his displeasure verbally and rebel, finally breaks away completely.

Jariwalla as Gandhi, does a great job, for one can quite believe his activism permeating into his familial relationships. Shefali Shah as Kasturba is marvelous, torn between husband and son, doggedly living her fate, as the supportive Indian wedded woman. Even Bhumika Chawla, last seen immersing herself in Bollywood-ian fluff, is very good as the pious, accepting-of-her-fate Gulab. But most impressive, and the character who evoked the most sympathy was Akshaye Khanna as Harilal.

Although Harilal’s character as portrayed in the film, is essentially that of a weak man, his desire to better himself whichever way, is nothing if not redeeming. He is the dutiful son, loving, devoted, but still rebelling against the notion that his life is pre-ordained, that everyone but him knows what’s best for him. How else to explain Gulab’s packing him away to S.Africa, telling him that “Bapu” needs him ? How else to explain when Gulab is sent back from S.Africa because “someone” decides that her presence is distracting Harilal from achieving his objectives ?

When Harilal, attempting to escape S.Africa incognito, is recognized and sent back to Gandhi, he talks frankly to his father of his desire to make his own destiny. Says Gandhi “And what if you can’t ?” So beautifully is Harilal’s angst sketched that one wonders if Harilal even had a chance with a parent who doubted him at every step.

This film’s strength is in it’s actors, and the sensitivity and compassion that is brought into it’s portrayals, beautifully expressing their dilemmas and constraints. The direction is good, and the dialogues pass muster. What I thought didn’t work too well, was the attempt to intersperse the flashback with the current, since it didn’t enhance the narration any.

Not your masala entertainer, this film still turned out to be an interesting watch, a close-up look at a great leader’s tenuous links with family, from a different point of view. This film might be the lone dissenting voice, amid the crowd of Gandhi devotees, but it presents it’s case well, humanely and with due compassion.

Posted in 2007, bollywood, drama, family-friendly, historical | 5 Comments

Review : Chak de India

cdi

Rating : Good (4/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2007
Running time : 2.5 hours
Cast : Shahrukh Khan, Anjan Srivastav, Chitrashi Rawat, Tanya Abrol, Shilpa Shukla, Sagarika Ghatge, Vidya Malvade
Director : Shimit Amin

CHAK DE INDIA : GLORIOUS !

Until about 10 years ago, I viewed modern-day Bollywood as a giant trash-spewing machine. Things have slowly changed for the good, however. With the advent of new, educated , “thinking” directors, some very good cinema has started to come out of Mumbai. Still it is rare that a thoroughly wholesome film graces desi film screens. A film which is feel-good, clean, positive and quality cinema. Tall order, eh ? But Chak De is one of those rare films. It is the story of the under-dog. “What ?”, you groan – “that tried-and-tested formula, the one that every down-on-his-luck Tom, Dick and Harry banks upon to save a sinking film ?” Yup, the very same. But “Chak de” is not sinking, and saving, it does not need. Formulaic or not, the film works and how.

“Chak de” is an out and out sports film. And it deals with an unlikely sport – hockey. Very far from the limelight (in which cricket basks), hockey and especially women’s hockey languishes. Impeded by governmental bureaucracy, with the babus thinking of women only as “chakla-belan chalaane-wali Bhartiyan nariyan”, short of coaches, facilities and sponsorships, the Indian Women’s Hockey Team is the perfect under-dog. To champion this under-dog comes coach Kabir Khan (SRK), an ex-hockey captain with a tarnished reputation. He has one goal in mind – the World Cup.

As we stare incredulous at the man’s temerity, he struggles on; besides the snide comments on his past that he has to face, the girls of the hockey team don’t want him, and the babus, believing the team unworthy, decide to not send a women’s team to the World Cup itself. This is Kabir’s second shot at a World Title. He’s tried once and lost. Is he slated to lose again ?

Shah Rukh Khan, in this film, leads a team of unknown actors. And it is to the director’s credit, that SRK doesn’t take over the film but is content to give each character her due. Khan himself gives a rousing performance, his best possibly after Swades. There is no twitching of the eyebrows, no hamming it up, and no shades of SRK overshadowing the character. SRK plays Kabir with a fragility I’d thought him incapable of.

Each of the 16 girls which form the Indian National Team, fits her character, from Soimoi Kerketa (Nisha Nair) of Jharkhand to Nethra Reddy (Sandia Furtado) of Andhra. The look is true and so is the accent. Drawn from the far corners of India, we have the lioness from Punjab – Balbir Kaur (Tanya Abrol), the tomboy from Haryana – Komal Chautala (Chitrashi Rawat), the veteran bully – Bindia Naik (Shilpa Shukla), the good-natured captain Vidya (Vidya Malvade) and the English-speaking mem from Chandigarh Preeti Sabharwal (Sagarika Ghatge). There is also Gunjan Lakhani, played by Shubhi Mehta of MTV Roadies fame (she was one of the 3 finalists in that season). Although these girls get the chunk of the action and the screen-time, all the cast have acquitted themselves rather well.

CDI is well-scripted (Ranjan Negi served as consultant), strong in it’s performances and on believability, and brings a freshness, honesty and integrity rarely seen. It gives us a desperate, yet strong band of girls striving to prove to themselves and to others, their worth and their ability. It gives us a man striving to redeem his honor and his title, but this is done subtly and without the emotional drama that passes for “motivation” in most Hindi films. Kabir Khan does not relate to us his tale of woe, (we get hints) nor does he revel in his martyrdom – he just believes and does. Finally a sensible hero.

As far as the girls are concerned, they aren’t just sacrificial lambs at the altar of nationalistic pride, but independent thinking women by themselves. They struggle as a team, and strive for their wins, not as a balm to Kabir Khan’s wounded pride, or swept-up in nationalistic jingoism. They do it because they love it; it is as much an affirmation of themselves as it is an honor for the country – a truly empowering sentiment.

The film goes further in it’s commentary on sexism – eve-teasers are roundly beaten-up, and those advocating that women remain in the kitchen, are booed. Through the dialogues, we also see the problem of treating the citizens from the North-Eastern states as “foreigners” simply because they look different – at the registration desk, Mary Ralte and Molly Zimik are accorded a “Welcome” and they wonder aloud why it is so, when they are in their own country. There is also the issue of the “generic” Madrasi which is dealt with – says one character “What is the difference between a Tamil and a Telugu ?” He gets a fitting reply.

We know that there is the whole unity-in-diversity theme going on here. We know that the director is playing upon our sympathies for the under-dog and the soft spot we have reserved for the ill-treated. We hear, ever so faintly, the drum-drumming of the dhol of patriotism. We also know how it will end. Still, the pleasure of seeing this film does not diminish. The editor has done a fine job indeed when a 2 and a half hour film does not seem as long, and the director has delivered a hit when the film flows along beautifully with nary a break in it’s narration.

This movie flouts the basic laws of Hindi films – there is no romance, no song-and-dance routines, no villains (unless you consider the oily, sarkari babus villains) and no obvious attempts at glamour. What is does offer is plenty of adrenalin, daring and guts. This is a perfect family film (how often do I say that ?) – it’s clean and wholesome. Besides that, and more importantly, it’s a rollicking entertainer, and jolly good fun.

Posted in 2007, bollywood, drama, family-friendly, recommended | 8 Comments

Review : Apne

apne

Note : The edited version of this review appears at Planet Bollywood, here.

Rating : Average (3/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2007
Running time : about 3 hours
Director : Anil sharma
Cast : Dharmendra, Sunny Deol, Bobby Deol, Kirron Kher, Shilpa Shetty, Katrina Kaif, Victor Banerjee, Divya Dutta

APNE : THE TALE OF PAPA, PUTTAR & THE CHIP

Yup, that about sums it up. There’s Papa Deol as Baldev, ex-boxing champ and there’s puttarji, actually 2 of them – Sunny paaji as devoted son Angad, and rocker-musician son Karan (Bobby). And then there’s the chip (it’s not the eating kinds), and it’s the size of Mount Govardhan (don’t know about Mount Govardhan, and attempting to see a film as nauseatingly pious as this ? Tsk, tsk !), and perched neatly on Papa’s shoulder. Papa has the chip because, once when he was a boxer and wrongly accused of doping charges, he swore to avenge his honor by making his son the champ. Angad, the son in question, however in the interests of family and common-sense, chose to quit boxing beyond a point and take up business, thus saving his family from penury. So, Papaji got angry and hasn’t been on good terms with Angad ever since.

OK, so now Angad poor kid, affection starved and all, is doing well, loves his family but longs for his father’s approval. Now, when an opportunity to restore some boxing prestige arises, Baldev chooses Karan to turn boxer (musician to boxer – easy-peasy, right ?). When Karan suffers a setback, its up to Angad again to step-up, and win this thing.

This film is from the director of Gadar, and I actually thought Gadar a decent film. This one, I don’t know, it’s too sanctimonious for it’s own good. Plus I have massive problems with the concept – that of children living out parent-ordained lives (what about the poor kid ?). This movie is still better than Baghbaan, as in I could actually watch the full film without going nuts (I nodded off for a little while, but does that count ?).

Hark ! Did I hear you asking about a family film which has the 3 Deol men crying as one ? If that’s what you want then this is it. Lots of emotional drama, lot’s of tears, and with all characters in the film soooooo pious and soooo good (except Papaji of course) , and (you want more ?) lot’s of brawn. Do note that in films starring Sunny Deol, you have either brain or brawn. One or the other, see ? And mostly, it’s brawn.

There are also the women dotting the screen here – the most prominent being the mother figure – Raavi (Kher) who plays her character to the hilt with the usual aplomb. Then, in keeping with the tenets of the Punjabi patriarchy and Bollywoodian principles, there are the other 2 women, Angad’s wife (Shipa) who has nothing much to do except say “Haanji”, nod her head and offer her supporting (and very shapely) shoulders to be cried upon, and Karan’s US returned doctor girlfriend (Katrina) who very conveniently turns into his personal doctor-cum-therapist when Karan’s paralyzed hand miraculously starts working again. And you though God’s miracles didn’t exist !

OK, so the good : the direction is decent, the acting is OK and Dharmendra still has the old-world charm. The bad – the sea of emotion, the music, and Sunny Deol’s wig. During the boxing scenes, with every jab, I was just waiting to see the wig go flying off . I’ll be fair and say that my parents actually liked the film; my Mom’s the weepy sorts – she would shed tears at the Ramayana television series, as I laughed out loud at the silly arrows going whish-whish across the screen.

This film is lush and glossy – it’s like they wiped down the screen with desi ghee. Verdant green dominates as do the fields of Punjab. There’s the Papaji and the Maa and their dutiful betas, and obedient bahus, and grand-kids, so yeah, as per my Mom, the whole family-bonding thing going on here. The first half was bearable, in the second the film descended down the path to the Land-of-Overwrought-Emotions. And you know, no-one actually comes back from there. Neither did the film.

Posted in 2007, bollywood, drama, ecstatically stupid, rating-PG | 4 Comments

Review : Partner

partner

Rating : The worst (-20/5)
Genre : Comedy
Year : 2007
Director : David Dhawan
Cast : Salman Khan, Lara Dutta, Govinda, Katrina Kaif, Rajpal Yadav, Dalip Tahil, Suresh Menon, Ali Haji

PARTNER : STUPID, STUPIDER, STUPIDEST

It’s amazing – you talk about “Jhoom Barabar Jhoom” or “Cheeni Kum” and people are moaning about the film, not happy, sitting on the fence – “Oh, it’s boring”, “Oh, the topic is too controversial”, etc., etc . And then you have films like “Partner” which come to you straight from David Dhawan and via the toilet, and people are giving it a Thumbs-Up ? Funny film ? Family Film ?? Oh, despair.

This film however does answer a very important question, one which has been giving me sleepless nights : “Can David Dhawan films get any worse ?”. And the answer folks, is YES, they can. Case in point – this one. Partner is probably the worst David Dhawan film I’ve seen. After I saw the film, I whined and moaned and bitched about this film for a whole hour, after which someone pointed out to me that this was a check-in-your-brains at the door kind of film (in fact the theater where I saw this film was offering locker rentals for this very purpose). And it’s not like David Dhawan actually dabbles in high-IQ , or even no IQ plots. Yes, I understand that. But even for the master of the absurd, the illogical, the non-sensical this one is a new low.

For starters, it has no plot. Yup, you heard me – no plot. Yes, I know , everyone says it’s inspired from “Hitch”, but the resemblance is so remote, it’s heard to detect. I mean, “Hitch” was bad enough. David Dhawan’s Indianised interpretation of it is the pits. Salman Khan is Prem, our very own Love Guru – why, oh why ? A cartoon character informs us – it’s because living in a houseful of sisters that’s what he learnt, you know, stuff about women. And it’s only a loser who lets precious knowledge go to waste. Therefore, the Love-Guru. Various men approach the all-knowledgeable Love Guru to find out how to win over women. One of them is Bhaskar (Govinda), a supreme idiot of the first order, who also happen to be Chief Financial Officer of a company. How ? Don’t ask. Bhaskar lusts after his boss, the very rich and beautiful Priya (Katrina), but since Priya seems so unattainable (you think ?), he needs help.

Prem, after much persuasion, agrees to help. He also meets intrepid journalist, Naina Sahni (Lara), a single mom and journalist, who often needs help escaping the clutches of Chotta Don (Rajpal Yadav), and decides that she’s the woman for him. Naina doesn’t agree and neither does her brat (child artiste Ali Haji). Thus the film – how these 2 get their women to assent.

OK, besides the no-logic part, I have a philosophical question. In most desi cinema everyone’s going on about the purity of love, love is in the heart, it’s not superficial etc. so how is it that the heroes (and they might be walking-talking mountains of blubber) always go for the model types ? Now, in all truth, Govinda has put on all a lot of fat. Add to that gravity, age and the incessant pelvis-grinding and you have a thoroughly unwholesome hero. Could you imagine a David Dhawan film with a correspondingly unwholesome female lead ? Yeah, I’m waiting for that one.

So then is anything in here even remotely watchable ? Yes, the songs. They’re loud and in-your-face but catchy and enjoyable. Salman has slimmed down and looks good. The women look good too, but unlike Salman, they have not much to do except look pretty and brainless. And the character of Lara’s kid – precocious, rude, and a perfect motivation for birth-control.

I’m not sure what to say about the direction. The film went from one absurd scene to the other. In the middle of these sprang, loud, boisterous song and dance numbers, which had no link whatsoever to what was going on in the film at the time. The dialogues got pretty crude (and sexist). I do think that if comedy is coming to this and we think of such films as “family films” we need a grading system to warn parents of impending dangers. While Partner is an exercise in long-drawn out double entendres, the last half hour is devoted to adult bedroom scenes. Women in short negligees and the come-hither look in the eyes are not kid-friendly.

This film left me numb (after the one hour of bitching post-movie). I went with low expectations, low – not rock-bottom. This film fell below them. Which is why I agree with a friend’s appraisal of it – it’s like a large, cool drink of water. From the toilet-bowl.

Posted in 2007, bollywood, comedy | 11 Comments