Movie Review : Aisha

Rating : Above average (3.9/5)
Genre : Romance
Year : 2010
Running time : 2 hours
Director : Rajshree Ojha
Cast : Abhay Deol, Sonam Kapoor, Ira Dubey, Amrita Puri, Cyrus Sahukar, Lisa Haydon, Anuradha Patel, M.K. Raina
Kid rating : G


AISHA : PEPPY, FEEL-GOOD ROMANCE !

Matches are made in heaven, but you’ve got earthly help too now. Meet Aisha Kapoor (Sonam Kapoor), richie-rich Daddy’s girl, and meddlesome matchmaker extraordinaire. Aisha’s hobbies in life are : shopping, spending Dad’s money, and match-making. Essentially good-hearted, this lost child-woman, means well, but bumbles through her life pairing people up the wrong way.

When she undertakes the grooming of “middle-class” Shefali to enable her to find a Delhi-bred husband, she is assisted in her endeavor by good friend Pinky Bose. However there’s always one person who finds fault with her I-know-it-all attitude, and that’s her child-hood friend Arjun Burman (Abhay Deol). Faced with his withering criticism, and seeing all her potential love-matches turn on their head, Aisha is starting to doubt her match-making skills . . .

Aisha is “loosely” based upon Jane Austen’s much acclaimed novel Emma. The central characters are relatively the same, but the situations have been massively Indianised. Sonam of course portrays the nosy heroine, and does marvelously, her exuberant personality and fetching good looks serving her well. Her quirky sidekicks are Pinky played by Ira Dubey (Lilette Dubey’s daughter, she was also in “The President is coming”), and the Cinderella wanna-be Shefali (Amrita Puri). Dubey and Puri both are fantastic, Dubey in particular portraying the caustic Pinky very well. Abhay Deol plays the role of Mr. Knightley, Emma’s critic and good friend, and delivers the much-needed maturity to the role.

For a first-time commercial film (she has directed lesser-known, low-budget films earlier), director Rajshree Ojha does outstandingly well. The film is slick, with great production quality and flows along smoothly. Characters are relatively well-developed, and the talented cast does justice to the roles. The dialogues were pretty realistic, and showed a sense of humor. Ojha portrays the camaraderie between friends and family very well, and handles the emotional nuances with a delicate touch.

Although Emma has been the subject of many adaptations, this novel situated in Victorian times is particularly suited to the Indian film scene (much like “Pride and Prejudice”) because match-making is India’s national past-time (I kid you not). Of course this is match-making for (and by) the very-rich, because it tells the story of pretty-young-things who don’t have to worry much about where the next Dior dress is coming from. And in that it reminded me of “Dil Chahta hai”, since that too portrayed the lives of the elite upper-class – the kinds who fly off to Mumbai (or Goa) at a whim, or think nothing of running up a bill of a few lakhs shopping at swanky designer malls.

Amit Trivedi produces an amazing soundtrack for this film. The title track “Suno Aisha” is a wonderful, peppy, offbeat number. I loved the almost-live feel of “Sham” , and “Gal mithi-mithi bol” is an energetic Punjabi number, thrumming with techno-bhangra beats. Javed Akhtar’s tasteful lyrics are the crowning jewel of a wonderful soundtrack.

If you’re looking for a faithful adaptation of Emma, this is not it – remember this is cliché-ridden Bollywood. But if you’re looking for a feel-good, light, fluffy fun film, Aisha is what you want. One of the better films of the year, I highly recommend this stylish movie.

Kid-wise : This is a clean, classy film – no double entendres and no vulgarity. It has one liplock, and some material which conceptually might be unintelligible to younger kids. On the whole though, pretty family-friendly.

Posted in 2010, bollywood, family-friendly, rating-G, recommended, romance | Tagged | 10 Comments

Movie Review : Once upon a time in Mumbai

Rating : Above average (3.9/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2010
Running time : 2 hours 5 minutes
Director : Milan Luthria
Cast : Ajay Devgun, Emraan Hashmi, Kangana Ranaut, Randeep Hooda, Prachi Desai
Kid rating : PG-13


ONCE UPON A TIME IN MUMBAI : The Mafia is here again !

“Once upon a time in Mumbai” – it’s a longish title, but it’s a good-ish film. My favorite genre, this is a crime thriller featuring the mafia, during the 60s and the 70s. So you have the tight churidaars and the big hair-dos, the almost Eastman color, and the sideburns. You also have Ajay Devgn in the genre he was born to play – the dark, brooding, principled gangster. An orphan, surviving on the streets of Mumbai, through his street-smarts, Devgan is Sultan Mirza. Resourceful Mirza learns the ways of the world and takes to smuggling. A born leader he stops small-time goons from warring with each other and unites them against the law.

Along the way, he develops a relationship with beautiful film superstar Rehana (Kangana Ranaut). Also in his employ is Shoaib Khan(Emraan Hashmi), an ambitious young upstart of a goon, who wants to take Sultan’s place as the head of Mumbai’s underworld. To make things a little more interesting we also have diligent policeman ACP Agnel Wilson (Randeep Hooda) who’s hot on Mirza’s heels.

Milan Luthria directs this film and handles it pretty well for the most part. The story is strong except for a few unfathomable turns, and it is multi-layered bringing in many interesting sub-plots, like that of Rihana’s dwindling filmi fortunes and Shoaib’s patient lover. On the negative side it suffers from some shoddy editing and falters a little on the pace, moving a tad slow. Thus it is not as crisp as Company (and I compare this with Company, since it is so strongly the same genre, and features the same lead protagonist), nor is it swift and smart like Maqbool. It is rather like a staid, plodding animal, but so devoted and intent on it’s purpose that you can’t help but pay attention to it.

“Once” features a great cast. Devgn gets full marks, and Hashmi who isn’t my favorite actor, does wonders, proving he can act when given direction. Ranaut looks very pretty in the overdone mascara and the humongous hair-buns, and acts her part very well. Now if only they could dub her weakling of a voice all would be well with the world ! Prachi Desai in her lovelorn, domestic doormat avatar, as Shoaib’s love interest comes across with feeling. A fit and athletic Hooda suits the role of a policeman on the prowl.

There’s an item number for all you folks feeling left out of the mix. Model and wanna-be actress Gauhar Khan (last seen in the wonderful Rocket Singh) dances to the remixed-redone “Parda”. The music is melodious – “Pee loon” by Mohit Chauhan has refrains of Sufi music, while “Baburao mast hai” by Mika has a happy-go-lucky effervescence. A high quality soundtrack, this one – Pritam strikes again.

I wouldn’t recommend this film for kids under 13 because of all the violence, and some suggestive scenes, but for all you adults looking for a solid, story-based drama, this is a definite must-see.

Posted in 2010, action, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13, recommended | 6 Comments

Upcoming films : July and August 2010

Release Date Film Title Genre Director Actors
Jul 2 I hate Luv-Storys Romance Punit Malhotra Sonam Kapoor, Imran Khan
Jul 9 Milenge Milenge Romance Satish Kaushik Shahid Kapoor, Kareena Kapoor, Arti Chabria, Satish Shah
Jul 9 Red Alert – the Enemy Within Drama Ananth Mahadevan Sunil Shetty, Sameera Reddy, Ayesha Dharker, Gulshan Grover, Seema Biswas, Bhagyashree, Aashish Vidyarthi, Murli Sharma, Ehsaan Khan, Naseruddin Shah, Vinod Khanna
Jul 16 Lamhaa Drama Rahul Dholakia Sanjay Dutt, Bipasha Basu, Kunal Kapoor, Shernaz Patel, Yashpal Sharma
Jul 16 Tere bin Laden Comedy Abhishek Sharma Ali Zafar, Barry John, Chinmay Mandlekar, Chirag Vohra
Jul 16 Udaan Drama Vikramaditya Motwane Ronit Roy,Rajat Barmecha,Aayan Boradia
Jul 23 Khatta Meetha Comedy Priyadarshan Akshay Kumar, Trisha Krishnan, Rajpal Yadav
Jul 30 Once Upon A Time In Mumbai Crime Thriller Milan Luthria Ajay Devgn, Emraan Hashmi, Kangana Ranaut, Prachi Desai, Randeep Hooda
Aug 06 Kajraare Romance Pooja Bhatt Himesh Reshammiya, Monalaizza, Amrita Singh
Aug 06 Aisha Romance Rajshree Ojha Abhay Deol, Sonam Kapoor, Ira Dubey
Aug 13 Peepli Live Comedy/Drama Anusha Rizvi Raghuveer Yadav, Omkar Das Manikpuri, Malaika Shenoy
Aug 20 Lafangey Parindey Romance Pradeep Sarkar Neil Nitin Mukesh, Deepika Padukone, Piyush Mishra
Aug 27 Hello Darling Comedy Manoj Tiwari Celina Jaitley, Isha Koppikar, Gul Panag, Javed Jaffrey, Divya Dutta, Chunky Pandey
Posted in 2010, bollywood | 1 Comment

Movie Review : Inception

Genre : Sci-fi, psychological thriller
Rating : 4/5

The subconscious has been a favorite subject of filmmakers, because on it’s vast, unexplored canvas anything is possible. So also in “Inception” where Christopher Nolan uses the mysteries of the mind to springboard us into a journey to a place where there are no rules. The film does not get into the sci-fi genre per se, but does present to us a world where Extraction is a known and well-honed art.

An Extractor is a thief who uses shared dreams to extract a person’s innermost secrets. And because our hero is an expert Extractor already, and needs to push the envelope, he must try out a new and very, very dangerous technique called “Inception”. Conceptually the reverse of Extraction, Inception is embedding an idea into a person’s subconscious so skillfully that the victim himself is unaware of the procedure, and thinks of the idea as his own.The details of Extraction are never very clearly spelled out, but we know the basics – you do need a good amount of sedative, one expert Extractor, a dreamscape designer and the subject himself. The subject understandably, is often uncooperative.

Leonardo di Caprio is Dom Cobb, the melancholy, bleary-eyed Extractor beset with his own demons. He has but one aim in life – to get back to his estranged family. When a potential customer Saito (Ken Watanabe) promises him a return to his family, in return for Cobb planting an idea in Saito’s business adversary Robert Fischer’s (Cillian Murphy) mind, he (Cobb) grabs the offer with both hands. As he forges ahead with his plan, he recruits Ariadne (Ellen Page) a young, intelligent architect to design his dreamscape. Also assisting him are Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), his long-time associate and researcher, Eames the forger (Tom Hardy) and Yusuf (Dileep Rao) the apothecary.

Because the task is so tricky, Cobb must use a three tier dream sequence, i.e.; a dream within a dream within a dream to embed the idea into Robert’s subconscious. With each dream level, time slows, and the dangers of losing oneself in a subconscious hellhole of no return increase. Cobb begins his journey of Inception alright, but from the very beginning things start to go very, very wrong.

Nolan writes and produces this film, and presents to us a novel, mind-bending idea. As with new concepts, this one requires watching the film closely for nuggets of the unexplained physics of Extraction. Nolan, does understandably gloss over many details, but throws us into the action from the get-go. We get to know the hero and his associates as they traverse their way through their dreams, their memories and real-life. But we do so removed and at a distance, for we never get close enough to the shuttered hero to root for him or his chosen path.

Caprio does as he is directed, and brings to this role the flighty, unstable personality that he displayed in “Shutter Island”. Too much of a good thing, maybe ? Marion Cottilard is quite fantastic as the forever-on-edge Mal. Gordon-Levitt, Hardy, Rao, and Michael Caine as Cobb’s support system are just right. Ellen Page as the intuitive dreamscape designer is great as the wide-eyed innocent delving deep into things not understood, and Watanabe stands his ground as Saito.

As the story wends it’s way into improbabilities, we go from one dream to another, treated to stunning visual effects. In one scene where Cobb is introducing Ariadne to the art of shared dreaming, we have them both in Paris, with the entire city folding in on itself. In another scene Arthur fights off an attacker in a weightless world, upended. The film’s settings seems Dali-like; no, there aren’t any melting clocks but with a strong weirdness quotient the film keeps us constantly guessing as to the reality of the dream-like world.

While I appreciated Nolan’s vision in bringing us this multi-layered piece of fantastical fiction, I do think that he was mired too deep in the technical details, the “theory” of it all, if you will, to give his full attention to the cinematical aspect. The film’s screenplay is intricately woven, but what this film lacks is emotional appeal – I watched it detached from the main protagonist’s plight. Yes, you want him to succeed, but are you hanging on to the edge of your seat wishing he would ? Not really.

Nolan isn’t too subtle about his style either, although I can’t fault him for that; if he won’t tell us that Extraction is dangerous and surreal – who will ? Some twists and turns in the story felt like hacks, and I could actually withdraw from the film enough to think about that while viewing it. “Inception” is intelligent enough, engrossing enough, but never to the point where I couldn’t tell how long it had been since it started. Still, it’s a good watch (the film did get a few audience claps at the end). And I’d recommend seeing it in 3D; I didn’t, but post-watch I’m willing to bet it will enhance the experience.

Posted in 2010, english, hollywood, outstanding, recommended, sci-fi | Tagged | 2 Comments

Movie Review : Toy Story 3

As we stood up to leave the theatre, the lady in the neighboring seat, turned to me and asked, “When did you last see a movie theatre which was this full ?” I have to say it’s been a while. Because all the seats, even the one right up in front of the screen, where you have to turn your head every time a character walks by, were full of people. We’d just managed to snag the last few seats on the incline, because we desis you know, must sit as far away from the screen as possible (it’s a balcony-seat-hangover).

Toy Story 3 is doing fabulously well. Of course it couldn’t have hurt that Sunday was Father’s Day, and Google did the neck-tie-thingy, and everyone needed a film which celebrated the whole family-belongingness-mushiness. What I am surprised at is the rave reviews that TS3 is garnering; NYT declared it critics pick (what is up with that – first Raavan and then this ?). It’s not that TS3 is uninteresting – my kids liked it; it is just that it is not engaging form an adult point of view.

Disney and Pixar are amazing. And I mean that – the detail, the depth, the absolutely stunning imagery on screen is a treat to watch. But the cherry on top is the fact that their films (at least the ones that do whoppingly well) are entertaining for the kids and the adults (Ice Age, Nemo, Up, etc.). Not so with this film. In fact I was beset with boredom uptil about a third of the film, and Thank Goodness that it improved after.

So, here are the bare bones : Andy the owner of all the toys (Woody (Tom Hanks), Buzz LightYear (Tim Allen) et al) is all grown up and leaving for college. Having to decide what do with his old toys, he picks Woody to go with him to college and decides to keep the rest in the attic. Unfortunately, they get donated to a daycare, ruled by Lots-of-huggin’ bear. Lotso banishes the new toys to the Caterpillar room, where they are ill-treated by the toddlers. And now the toys must try and get out and return to Andy’s . . .

Toy Story 2: Special Edition - DVDToy StoryAs I said the film improved with time. It got atleast mildly interesting with the Toys planning their escape, and Lotso reconnoitering the daycare with his state-of-the-art cameras, and screaming monkey. Still, it’s very much been there-done that; love and friendship served in yet another animated package. The setting and the problems of the film were too juvenile to elicit interest from beyond the 15-year old mark, and it took a while just settling down and giving us the basics in the beginning.

I would rate it just about average (the first Toy Story was infinitely better). I think the film is well marketed and the hype is growing. Of course if the little ones like it, the parents are bound to go in droves. TS3 is all set to have a very successful run.

Posted in 2010, animation, english, family-friendly, hollywood | 2 Comments

Supermen of Malegaon

Supermen of Malegaon (New Hindi Documentary Film)Year : 2008
Genre : Documentary
Running time : 79 minutes
Director : Faiza Ahmad Khan
Actors : Shaikh Nasir, Akram Khan, Farogh Jafri, Shafiq, Shakeel Bharati

“Supermen of Malegaon” is a film about the making of another film “Malegaon ka Superman”. Yes, it is not just the Yash Chopras and the Karan Johars with their vast resources who have the desire to make films. It is also an enthusiast in the small town of Malegaon who wishes to see his dreams come alive on celluloid. Having made several small shorts on a next to nil budget, one of them being a spoof on Sholay called “Malegaon ke Sholay”, self-taught filmmaker Shaikh Nasir is set to attempt his next ambitious project. This time, inspired by Hollywood, it is a spoof on Superman. Faiza Ahmad Khan, the creator of this documentary, chronicles his efforts.

This is great for us, because “Supermen of Malegaon” is a treat to watch. Khan documents the film making effort – true, but more importantly she gives us an insight into the passion that drives wedding videographer Nasir to make a film with his meager budget. Nasir’s film, meant to be a parody, takes it’s cues from Bollywood, which means that it has a hero, heroine and a villain, complete with romance, fight sequences and a song. The hero, because he is Superman has a red-and-blue costume with boxers and cape, stitched by the village tailor. Emblazoned on his chest is a bold M for Malegaon. The hero is played by scrawny powerloom worker Shafique, and the heroine is a non-local actress, because the men of Malegaon won’t let their women work outside the home.

Malegaon is a typical Indian small-town – dusty streets, narrow unpaved roads, poverty writ large on the faces of the children that gather to watch the shoot. A textile producing center with powerloom mills, it offers little in the way of entertainment, but is very fond of Bollywood. Little shops derive titles from Hindi blockbusters and kids name hero and heroines by heart. Nasir’s crew is a motley bunch, piecing together the storyline for their film with audience titillating “hooks” like a bomb blast, but adapting it to Indian surroundings. Thus Superman suffers from pollution induced asthma, and the villain is the King of Thu-thu Gutka (tobacco).

Nasir’s film also has stunts, and Superman flying through the air. To achieve these he, along with using techniques like chroma key technology also makes use of rickshaws, trucks (the beloved “public carrier” of Indian roads) and manpower. Thus we have Superman aka Shafiq, flying through the air in front of a green screen, his body balanced on narrow wooden beams that run through his costume, the whole contraption supported on a rickshaw cart and a bunch of willing hands.

While on the surface this film is light-hearted and slap-sticky, it has undertones which show us the lives of the village folk, the poverty and the quiet desperation of it’s people. While Nasir won’t let his younger brother into film-making because he fears that it will turn him into a swagger filled hero with no trade, and is content to restrict his talents to Malegaon, his scriptwriter Farogh and soundman Akram dream of making it big in Mumbai. This documentary might not be a laughter fest, but it does carry along on an upbeat note, chiefly because of it’s people – the passionate and determined Nasir, the hollow-cheeked, frail-looking Shafiq wanting to act like Amitabh Bachchan, the poet Farogh and the marvelously dramatic Akram. Quite inspiring.

The film itself has a “handheld” feel, as though Khan went from person to person asking questions, probing beneath the surface. The humor like the pathos is an undercurrent, and derives from the often quirky situations Nasir faces while shooting the film to his satisfaction.

This documentary ends with the completion and premiere of “Malegaon ka Superman” at Nasir’s old video parlor. It is received with humongous applause by the village people, a fact that leaves Nasir smiling and excited. And this film, the charming documentary that chronicles the making of “Malegaon ka Superman” has been applauded by the rest of the world. “Supermen of Malegaon” has made the Festival rounds garnering for itself many awards, and has finally hit the theaters in the US. It is distributed by FilmKaravan.

A very interesting watch, I highly recommend it.

Posted in documentary, recommended | Comments Off on Supermen of Malegaon

Movie Review : I hate Luv Storys

Rating : Poor (1.5/5)
Genre : Romance
Year : 2010
Running time : 2 hours 15 minutes
Director : Punit Malhotra
Cast : Sonam Kapoor, Imran Khan, Sammir Dattani, Samir Soni, Bruna Abdullah, Ketaki Dave, Anju Mahendru
Kid rating : PG-13




I HATE LUV STORYS  (Movie Review) : CLICHED DRIVEL !

Having watched several slick Karan Johar productions, I have no doubt that Johar spares no expense when it comes to his films. So it is a pity indeed that he cannot afford to hire scriptwriters above a mental age of five. “I hate Luv Storys” is the kind of insufferable tripe that poor scripting, a boring storyline and a clueless director can produce.

Here are the basics : Casanova-ish Boy meets Girl, Girl already attached to Mr. Perfect abhors Boy. In true Bollywood-ian style, the repulsion turns into attraction, but filmi problems persist leading to a long, drawn-out yawn of a film. As far as story goes this film comes up with zilch – all we have are conversations where the lead pair talk to themselves and to each other. They also talk to their bosses and co-workers (they both work on the film-set), and it is quite remarkable as to how inane, uninteresting and humorless the dialogues are.

The Girl aka Simran (the very pretty Sonam) is into major introspection and apt to ponder way too much on the meaningless nuances of the Boy’s conversation (“Is my life really filmi ? Is there nothing like Perfect ?”) but that is as far as she gets to doing anything. I rather wish that she’d have slit a wrist or jumped off a cliff instead of just batting her fake eyelashes – that’d have woken me up from the film-induced stupor.

The Boy aka Jay Dhingra (Imran Khan) is cast from the true-blue Johar mould. He is into anything in a skirt, treats women as a use-and-throw commodity, and is probably the most annoying screen character I have had the displeasure of watching this year. If that doesn’t make your insides go all warm and fuzzy ladies, there’s more – he’s got a dodgy work ethic, is boring and has major pretensions at “coolness” (doesn’t use his last name, since it is not cool enough, and shortens his first to “J”). Quite the dreamboat, our “J”.

I’m not aiming for perfection here; all I’d like is to have remotely likeable people as the lead characters. Externally Simran and Jay look like good-looking young individuals presumably with brains in working condition. Apparently that’s only for the trailers/teasers – as you get into the film you realize that both are actually children in adult bodies, with their minds stuck around the teen years (post-watch I’d say the director is stuck there too).

The emoting from Sonam and Imran is quite flat, and I’m blaming weak direction for this. Sonam who did quite well in Delhi-6, can’t quite manage it here. And Khan who seems the tailor-made chocolate hero, can’t quite beguile us with the filmi clichés he’s supposed to portray. The film does carry the Johar mark; it manages to poke fun at fat people, show us various graphs on how hotness figures vs. fat/other undesirable traits in a female, and compare women to busses (when one goes, another comes – didn’t you know ?) and make various unnecessary references to sex (we talk about S.E.X, we must be hip – yeah, baby ?)

I would tell you more, but there is not much more to tell. The 2 hr 15 min length is way too long; we wouldn’t have lost much if this film had been cut by 80% (or better still if it had not been made at all). On the bright side, the film takes a stab at humor by laughing at the sorry state of the film-making industry and attempting to lampoon Karan Johar himself, by basing J and Simran’s boss Veer Kapoor (Samir Soni) on him. The songs are great, and Sonam is luminous. Everything else – the story, characterization, dialogues and direction can be summed up in just one descriptive word : CRAP.

Kidwise : This film hints at love-making/one-night stands, has women in underwear and lingerie, various in-your-face references to sex (Have a problem ? Have sex !) and sexuality and a brief scene at a strip club.

Posted in 2010, bollywood, rating-PG13, romance | 4 Comments

Dolls : A woman from Damascus

This is a documentary by Diana El Jeiroudi, who has scripted, written and directed the film. The film is about a young woman Manal, and her fight, if you could call it that, to be employed in a job outside the home. She wants it because it engages her mind, gives her a sense of identity (she uses a word very similar to “wajood”). However her wants are against traditional Syrian society and culture where women are expected to work only if they need financial help. As she herself puts it the elders want the girls to get out of school and get married – no college/university etc.

As a metaphor to her life, Jeiroudi, in parallel shows us the Fulla doll, a Syrian version of Barbie. Fulla is a veiled doll, that is her clothing is covered by an outer abaya, which covers her hair and neck, so the only part of her that you can see is her face. Fulla, we are told by a Fulla company representative is fashioned after the populace at which she is directed. He says that they try to make her (Fulla) conservative – and by conservative he says he means a woman who respects, is obedient etc. He says they took feedback from the public, they flattened her chest, made her undergarments a part of the body, so that even if her clothes were taken off, the doll could not be “naked”.

 In the beginning of the film, there is a voiceover (by Jeiroudi, I assume) which tells us that the veil is coming back in fashion. Also we see women on the streets in Western wear, pants, skirts, jeans and tights, but with their heads covered by the veil. Manal also wears Western clothes – we see her in pants and long skirts, and kurti like tops. She also wears a head covering. Also featuring in the film are her husband Bashar and their daughters Naya and Yara. There are also her parents and her in-laws.

This is an interesting film, especially since Jeiroudi succeeds in conveying Manal’s emotions so well. Manal wants to work outside the home for herself, and for her sense of self, as she did once, and Jeiroudi documents her search for a job, in a conservative, patriarchal society.

Beautifully done, I highly recommend this one.

Posted in documentary, recommended | Comments Off on Dolls : A woman from Damascus

Movie Review : Raavan

Rating : Poor (2/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2010
Running time : 2 hours 20 minutes
Director : Mani Ratnam
Cast : Abhishek Bachchan, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Ravi Kisshen, Govinda, Vikram, Tejaswini Kolhapure
Kid rating : PG-13


RAAVAN (Review) : FAILS TO THRILL !

We seem to be awash in mythology-based films. Recently there was Rajneeti, a modern-day Mahabharat, and now we have Raavan, based on the Ramayana. Mani Ratnam’s interpretation is situated in the forest too, where notorious brigand/self-styled Robinhood Beera (Abhishek Bachchan) kidnaps the local police chief’s wife Ragini Sharma (Aishwarya). The motive apparently is revenge for the molestation of Beera’s sister at the hands of the law (the Surpanakha angle).

As the police chief Dev Pratap Sharma (Southern superstar Vikram) gets in hot pursuit, Beera moves into the jungles with Ragini and his cohorts (Ravi Kissen being one of them). Sharma gets help from forest guard Sanjivani (Govinda), (a mix of Sugriva and Hanuman), in navigating the jungles, but every time they come close, Beera has already slipped ahead. Meanwhile feisty Ragini, in close contact with her kidnapper, begins to see the motivations that drive him, and he in turn is attracted to her radiant beauty and fiery spirit. Will Sharma ever manage to find Ragini ? And if he does will Ragini have to choose between the two ?

Ratnam’s Raavan is a sumptuous feast for the senses. Ratnam frames his shots artistically, brings home the atmosphere in lush, rain-drenched forests, and channels the primeval in Beera’s character. The film has a lot of “mood” and plays out like a heavy, poetic, ambiance-laden musical opera, rather than a commercial Hindi film. Ratnam seems to have made the film about good and evil incarnate instead of actual people because he uses characters that seem to have found their primordial roots; they scream, shout and prance around as if possessed.

The first half of the film bears the burden of laying out the playing field, establishing the rhythm which will move this film forward. Consequentially it suffers in pace and storytelling, being devoted to Beera moving through the jungles and Sharma following along – something which got pretty boring after a while. Abhishek plays Beera as a rather eccentric, almost of-his-rocker villain. Given to guttural growls, random head-shaking and monkey-like chittering Beera appears almost bestial at times. And while that might be Ratnam’s interpretation of Raavan, it didn’t seem to click with the rest of Beera’s persona.

Aishwarya, never much of an actress to begin with, has one thing is her favor – she is a luminous beauty, something that brings much to this role. Unfortunately Ratnam has her shouting and shrieking her way through the film, leaving very little character to come through, except maybe at the end of the film. Vikram, as the Superintendent of Police came across as a regular South-Indian hero (and not at all as a “Sharma” of the Hindi belt, which was what he was supposed to be), slightly stocky, jean-clad with tucked-in tee, Raybans perched on his nose, and a smoking cigarette at his lips. He appeared cold and removed, not exuding any of the warmth required as a powerful yet benign savior. Me thinks Ratnam might have been better served casting him as Beera.

Now Abhishek, for all his chittering and lazy head-rolls, never quite manages to plumb the depths of this role. It is a hard task because Ratnam imbues his characters with ambiguities – they are not just black or white – well beyond Bachchan’s limited skill set. (He might have done well as the SP though.) Ravi Kissen was good as Beera’s right hand man, and Govinda just about adequate as Sanjeevani.

I have many problems with this film, something I never thought I’d say about a Mani Ratnam product. So lost is he in his “art” work, because that is what it is – a pastiche of delicately framed shots and overwrought emotion, that he ignores the basic demand of cinema – to keep the viewer engaged and sympathetic. Ratnam’s Raavan is filled with angst-ridden characters who are hard to identify with, much less be sympathetic to. (And when I mean identify with I don’t mean it as identifying with the persona, but with their redeeming qualities.) The film slow paced as it was seemed overly long. A 50% reduction is length would have done wonders, because it could have stopped the first half from dragging and brought the narration quickly to the relatively better second.

Post-watch I have to say that Mani Ratnam definitely had a vision, probably one of an artistic film with earthy fervor strong enough to sway the masses. However it didn’t quite turn out like that. With an almost insufferable first half, a very average second, and poor music to boot, this film is way below Ratnam’s usual caliber of film-making. I’d advise a DVD watch, if at all.

Kidwise : This film has references to rape/molestation, some nudity, and a lot of violence.

Posted in 2010, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13 | 5 Comments

Desi Comedy (Indian Comedy Tour)

Indian Comedy TourAnd I mean the stand-up kinds. It’s not that it doesn’t exist, it is just that there are fewer desis who dare choose this as a profession. Can you imagine where being a desi comedian stands as compares to say a doctor or an engineer, from a parental point of view, given that parents gravitate towards the degreed professions ? If I’d shown an inclination, I can quite imagine my parents blowing a fuse : You want ot be a WHAT ? And what does that pay ? What about insurance/vacation plans, blah, blah, blah ? So really, more power to these folks. Especially because they are pretty good at what they do.

I saw this via Netflix Streaming, and the “Indian Comedy Hour” which is what it is titled features 5 comics : Vidur Kapur, Rajiv Kumar Satyal, Vijai Nathan, Mark Saldana and Dalia McPhee. I had not seen any of them before except for Nathan who’s show I’ve watched live. Kapur is the only immigrant, which means born in India, and Dalia is the only Irish American of the five. The remaining three are Indian Americans.

The five had very different material, although Nathan’s seemed familiar, since some of it was the same as the earlier live show I’d seen. Rajiv Satyal was very funny although I cannot quite recall his jokes. Saldana who is stocky made fun of his weight, among other things. Nathan mimicked her parents, and Dalia had a very short screen time (probably longer in the actual live show ?). Now Kapur was a total surprise, since he’s gay and very out-of-the-closet. He came on stage wearing a vest with a pink tie. He’s bald, has large protruding eyes, and a tendency to wiggle his eyebrows, which makes him seem a little eccentric but heightens the comedic appeal at the same time. Yeah imagine an eccentric looking, bony, gay desi guy wiggling his eyebrows !

I’d say Kapur was the funniest followed by Saldana, Satyal, Nathan and McPhee in that order. Although they all had jokes about sex and sexuality, Saldana was probably the raunchiest, and his material was only mildly R-rated when compared to someone like Russell Peters. Peters is probably the funniest desi comic I’ve seen, and I’ve seen him live. Margaret Cho, who is Chinese-American, and uses her Chinese background very effectively in her material, is very funny too, although she is way more R-rated than Peters even. Here’s some of Kapur’s work I found on Youtube :

Posted in All Netflix, english, humor, rating-R, recommended | Comments Off on Desi Comedy (Indian Comedy Tour)