Movie Review : Gran Torino

Photobucket

Gran Torino is a clichéd redemption tale, with Clint Eastwood playing the character of an abrasive, bigoted old war veteran. And while it might not be a pioneering film, because we’ve seen it all before, it is still entertaining, partly because of Eastwood’s charisma and screen presence (he’s 80) and partly because we’re all suckers for the well-worn formula where the bigot turns out to have a heart of gold.

OK, so then Eastwood is Walt Kowalski, an unpleasant old widower, who’s not got too many friendly words to say to anyone. He doesn’t get along with his sons, and has a majorly racist attitude to the Asian family next door; he liberally spews words like “gooks” and “chinks” around. When Thao (Bee Vang) the Hmong boy next door tries to steal Walt’s prized car, a vintage Gran Torino, as part of a gang initiation, and fails, loner Walt is forced to interact with the family. Thao’s older sister Sue (Ahney Her) persuades cranky old Walt to come eat at a family gathering, and when Walt unintentionally helps drive away gang-members from the family’s front-yard, he becomes the neighborhood hero.

As a part of his atonement for trying to steal Walt’s car, Thao, according to his traditionalist family, must come work for Walt for a week. In that time, Walt, already softened by Sue’s friendly attitude, realizes that Thao needs his help . Will old cranky Walt be able to deliver it in time ?

Gran Torino (Widescreen Edition)I’ve never considered Eastwood a great actor, so it comes as no surprise that he overdoes it here. Eastwood’s character Walt, is a nasty old man, atleast superficially, so Eastwood goes around growling at people in the film. Vang and Her who play the brother sister team next door aren’t very good actors either, Her being the better of the two.

This is an old-fashioned sort of film. Walt is an old-fashioned sort of a guy, not given to small-talk or niceties after his wife’s death. He spends hours polishing his Gran Torino, and sitting on the porch chewing jerky and reading the newspaper. The film is like him, no frills, rather plain jane-ish when compared to other films. It tells a simple story, and although Eastwood loads it up with every trick in the book, this ham-handed look at goodness in people, leaves you all warm and fuzzy and hopeful.

This film has violence and profanity and is unsuitable for kids under 15.

Posted in drama, english, hollywood, recommended | 2 Comments

Movie Review : Moon

Photobucket

I came by this film while browsing through Netflix. I didn’t see it on any Top 10 lists, and I wonder why; it seems like a film like this should have had more buzz surrounding it. “The Moon” is science fiction and set in a time in the future, when a great source of energy has been found, and we humans are harvesting the moon for it.

Thus it happens that Sam Bell (Sam Rockwell) is the lone human on a harvesting station on the moon, supervising 3 harvesters which mine the moon for Helium 3. Helium 3 is then shipped to earth where it is used to produce energy through pollution-less fusion. The base is comfortable, well-equipped and almost fully automated, and thus needs very little human supervision. At this point in time, Sam is the only one providing it.

Sam has only GERTY(the voice of Kevin Spacey), the base computer to keep him company. The station is having satellite communication problems, so Sam does not have a direct communication link to earth, but can keep up with his wife Tess, via recorded messages back and forth. Sam has been alone on the moon for almost 3 years, and now with only two more weeks to go, is looking forward to going back to earth to be with his wife and little daughter, Eve. But three years is a long time, and although Sam is in relatively good shape, the loneliness is starting to get to him, and he is starting to see things.

Distracted, and while in the lunar rover, out on a routine service call, he crashes into a harvester, and passes out. When he reawakens he is in the base infirmary being attended to by an anxious GERTY. GERTY is over-protective, citing Sam’s injury, but Sam is suspicious that something is amiss . . .

When Sam started “seeing” stuff, it seemed vaguely familiar, and reminded me of the hallucinations on “Solaris”. Also GERTY the base computer reminded me of HAL from Arthur C. Clark’s Space Odyssey books/films. So, yes while there is some “inspiration” from other SF films about space travel and lunar stations, Moon is a wholly original film. The film gets it’s “feel”, and it is one of dread and impending doom, from the initial setup – the premise that on the entire lunar surface there is one man all alone, separated from earth and the people he loves by many, many miles, and a broken SatCom link. Plus GERTY is a little weird, a little sly; one wonders whether there is some oddity programmed into it’s operating system, and whether he (I tend to think of GERTY as another person) actually is there to “help” Sam, as he puts it.

MoonThe film’s storyline is quite unpredictable. Keeping in mind the fact that this film has few characters the director does manage to keep one engrossed, and the pace, although not quite clip-clopping away, is quite alright. There is an inherent weirdness to the atmosphere, and one almost expects “bad things” to happen, knowing full well, that 3 years of alone-time can’t be a good thing.

Compared to the special-effects sci-fi genre that is currently so abundant, and so popular, this is a no-frills film. And while it ponders deeper questions like loneliness, and one’s need of acceptance, family and friends, it does so simply, and by raising questions in your mind. The first sci-film by director Duncan Jones (son of David Bowie), “The Moon” proves that you don’t need hype, hoopla or a bunch of spaceships engaged in perennial warfare, to make a good sci-fi film (although I like those too); good ideas and a strong story will suffice. This was really quite a lovely film – highly recommended.

Posted in drama, english, hollywood, outstanding, recommended, sci-fi | 8 Comments

Upcoming films : March 2010

An interesting bunch of films this month; besides a horror film which is kind of unusual, and the usual dramas and romances, there are a few outstanding directors to look forward to. There’s Shyam Benegal, who returns after 2008’s “Welcome to Sajjanpur”, Kabeer Kaushik who returns after the 2005 “Sehar”, and Dibakar Banerjee who returns with “Love Sex aur Dhoka” or LSD (on Fridays I am very punny). And ofcourse there is Dev Benegal’s “Road, Movie” which is slated to release today, but I can’t find it any theatre nearby.

Release Date Film Title Genre Director Actors
Mar 5 Road, Movie Drama Dev Benegal Abhay Deol, Satish Kaushik,Tannishtha Chatterjee
Mar 5 Atithi tum kab jaoge Comedy Ashwani Dheer Ajay Devgan, Konkona Sen Sharma, Paresh Rawal
Mar 5 Milenge Milenge Romance Satish Kaushik Kareena Kapoor, Shahid Kapoor
Mar 5 Thanks Maa Drama Irfan Kamal Ranvir Shorey, Mukta Barve, Alok Nath, Raghuveer Yadav, Barry John
Mar 12 Right Yaaa Wrong Drama/Action Neeraj Pathak Sunny Deol, Irrfan Khan, Konkona Sen Sharma, Isha Koppikar, Kiron Kher
Mar 12 Do Dilon Ke Khel Mein Comedy/Romance Akash Pandey Rajesh Khanna, Nausheen Ali Sardar, Satish Kaushik
Mar 19 Mittal Vs Mittal Drama Karan Razdan Rituparna Sengupta, Rohit Roy, Gulshan Grover
Mar 19 Love Sex Aur Dhokha Drama Dibakar Banerjee Imran Khan, Abhay Deol
Mar 19 Lahore Drama Sanjay Puran Singh Chauhan Farooq Sheikh, Nafisa Ali, Sraddha Das, Ashish Vidhyarthi, Sushant Singh
Mar 19 Shaapit Horror Vikram Bhatt Aditya Narayan, Shweta Agarwal, Shubh Joshi, Rahul Dev
Mar 26 Well Done Abba Drama Shyam Benegal Minissha Lamba, Boman Irani, Divya Dutta
Mar 26 Hum tum aur ghost Comedy Kabeer Kaushik Arshad Warsi, Dia Mirza, Sandhya Mridul
Posted in bollywood, Previews | Tagged | Comments Off on Upcoming films : March 2010

Movie Review : Karthik calling Karthik

Rating : Above average (3.75/5)
Genre : Thriller/Fringe horror
Year : 2010
Running time : 2 hours 15 minutes
Director : Vijay Lalwani
Cast : Farhan Akhtar, Deepika Padukone, Shifaali Shah, Ram Kapoor
Kid rating : R

Karthik Narayan(Akhtar) is a simple, unassuming guy who just can’t help being bullied. You could say that he has very little sense of self, or various neuroses which consume his sleeping hours – whatever it is, Karthik has it bad. He’s got an aggressive landlord who hounds him for money, a nasty boss who won’t give him rightful credit, and co-workers who dismiss him as a loser.

But life changes for Karthik when he starts getting self-affirming telephone calls from someone who claims to be . . . himself. This telephone Karthik seems confident and assured and gives loser Karthik advice which helps transform his life. The landlord is now subservient, the boss applauds him, and Shonali Mukherjee (Padukone), the stunning co-worker who doesn’t know Karthik exists, suddenly wants to be his girlfriend! Will this wonderful life last, or is it just another trick of fate ?

This is quite an ambitious film, seeing that it has a pretty unconventional subject, almost no masala, none of the usual flamboyance of Hindi cinema, or the neatly ordered endings that the masses clamor for. The first half was a breeze as we watch Karthik justly asserting himself, and the nasty people getting their comeuppance. This is also where happy Karthik sings all the melodious songs with Shonali. The second half where all the serious stuff happens drags a bit, and there is need of some strong editing here. Attention spans are limited, and the camera pans a little too long on shot endings, which lessens impact and takes away some of the tautness that a thriller must have to work.

Farhan is easy to watch as down-trodden Karthik. He just as easily transforms to suave, confident Karthik – really some very fine acting. Deepika is lovely as Shonali, and while she probably is a bit understated (as she almost always is), she still does very well. Ram Kapoor who seems to be expanding in girth every time I see him on screen (big and small) plays a rather clichéd character Mr.Kamath; the nasty boss done to the hilt. He shouts, threatens, swaggers and insults and that’s pretty much his role. There’s also Shefali Shah as Dr. Kapadia, the bespectacled psychiatrist, and she is adequate in her small role.

For a first film, director Vijay Lalwani does a pretty good job, the biggest flaw in this film being it’s editing. In this thriller, the telephone is the chosen instrument of torture. And while there is some ominous buildup everytime our hero reaches out to take the call, it takes too much time to do anything. It’s like the camera is thinking about panning, wile we the audience are already at the scene! Classic camera lag – bad for any fringe horror film worth it’s salt. Lovingly lingering camera shots are good for romantic fluff, or serenely beautiful films which hint at the meaning of life. For a thriller, we’d expect more snap and crackle, and short bristling takes.

It might be that the story is not totally sound, but it also feels like Lalwani hasn’t quite figured out how to make a thriller feel like one. KCK while adequate, lacks the intensity so needed for this genre. The ending is a bit ho-hum, although logical once you wrap your mind around it, and the film itself is little under-whelming. You’d want a thriller, even a subtle one, to get in your face, and wrest from you your undivided attention. KCK can’t do that, because it’s not a tight, taut package.

This movie is still worth a watch, if you need some spooky-time, or a break from the usual masala-fare. This film is clean; it does have a few, fleeting scenes featuring romantic intimacy, but there is zero vulgarity/crudeness. The subject is probably unsuitable for kids under 15 though (I’m rating this an R); younger kids might not get it, besides being spooked out, and older kids still might need an explanation of the neuroses of the human mind.

Posted in 2010, bollywood, drama, rating-R, recommended, thriller | 4 Comments

Movie Review : Dev.D

Rating : ⭐️⭐️⭐️ 1/2
Genre : Drama
Year : 2009
Running time : 2 hours 18 minutes
Director : Anurag Kashyap
Cast : Abhay Deol, Mahi Gill, Kalki Koechlin, Dibyendu Bhattacharya, Parakh Madan
Kid rating : R


DEVD : THE POOR LITTLE RICH BOY !

Anurag Kashyap’s version of Devdas, is the classic novel set in the modern day. So the path downhill, which our Dev takes, is varied, but it is downhill just the same. Abhay Deol plays Devinder, our spineless, selfish hero, who spurns his almost-girlfriend Parminder, once he suspects her of being unfaithful (no cast/class card here as in the original). Pragmatic Parminder or Paro (Mahie Gill) moves on and marries Bhuvan, a middle-aged widower with kids. Once Paro is married, Dev pines for her, and having access to his rich father’s funds, runs himself down with drugs and drink. Possible redemption looms on the horizon in the guise of prostitute Chanda (Kalki Koechlin), an Anglo-Indian woman with emotional problems of her own. Does Dev finally find what he’s looking for, or do the two lost souls sink together ?

This film has a wonderful cast, Deol is fabulous as Dev, a spoilt, inveterate loser, with scant regard for anyone but himself. Kashyap’s Dev is a grown-up child, pining away for what he cannot have. Existing on the fringes of the adult world, flush with Daddy’s funds, and bereft of Paro’s legitimate affection now that she is someone else’s wife, Dev seems to exist in a hazy world propped up by alcohol and drugs.

Mahie Gill as passionate Paro, and Koechlin as Chanda, the well-to-do girl come down in the world, are very good too. As in the original the female characters are way stronger than the male, and yes, you still can’t sympathize with Devdas’s character. Paro, in her modern avatar, is still situated in a conservative setup, although she isn’t that demure herself. And Chanda’s story is probably inspired by the MMS schoolgirl scandal of a couple of years back.

This is a well made film with deft direction, great acting, and a pretty tight script. The music is in a class by itself, “emotional atyachar” probably everyone’s favorite catchphrase of the year; I quite liked “Nayan barse” myself. Kashyap’s work seems to exist in an alternate, somewhat whacky universe; while the film seems to have earthy roots, Dev and Paro’s families staunchly rural Punjabi families, we are also treated to surreal vignettes. There’s Chanda in a nurse’s uniform, in different wigs, mouthing husky French phrases, satisfying a client. There’s Chanda again, facepainting Dev ? And there is this 3 men performance (in a bar/pub), which I quite liked, but it seemed pretty far out. And then there is the “rock” version of “emotional atyachar”. Surreal just about describes it. But even Kashyap’s funky outlook on this classic, cannot change the fact that this is a journey down destruction lane, and mercilessly put, there is only so much voyeuristic “bird-watching” that one can do, before the novelty starts to wear off.

This film does not work on the general “good” protagonist scale, because there is not much redeemable about Dev, except that he does seem to have a smidgen of a conscience buried under all that vodka. As much as I admire Kashyap’s “vision” and his ability to give a modern twist to such an old classic, and so flawlessly weave it into contemporary life, this film did not work for me. Not so much his fault, as the film’s storyline’s. All that quality goes down the drain, because I can’t sympathize with the lead, and couldn’t care less if he jumped off the nearest cliff. Also, all you Friday movie-watchers beware, although it has its moments, DevD is a dark, and somewhat depressive film. Watch it for the director’s spin and the bevy of great actors that populate it.

Kidwise: Unsuitable for kids, this one gets an R rating.

Posted in 2009, All Netflix, bollywood, drama, rating-R, recommended | Tagged | 3 Comments

Movie Preview : Road, Movie

Dev Benegal’s latest in quite a while “Road, movie” hits theatres March 5th. The film premiered at the 2009 Toronto Film Festival, and has been doing the film festival circuit since. 95 minutes long, and starring Abhay Deol, Satish Kaushik, Tannishtha Chatterjee and Yashpal Sharma, the film is about a young man who, unenthused about joining his father’s hair oil business, volunteers for a trip across the desert in an old battered Chevy. Little does he know that the journey will change his life.

The film is produced by Ross Katz (Lost in translation). I’ve seen Benegal’s “Split Wide Open”, which I’m not gaga about. “Road,movie” seems to have gotten rave reviews, and seeing how Abhay Deol picks his films, this has got to be interesting.

Posted in bollywood, drama, Previews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Movie Preview : Road, Movie

Movie Review : Percy Jackson and the Olympians – The lightning thief

Uma Thurman as Medusa

Since the kids were champing at the bit to see this film, weeks before it was even released (superb marketing – everyone knew that it was coming) the day after it released, we did. Now I have not a clue about the son of Poseidon a.k.a Percy Jackson, unlike the kids who’ve read the series, and went gaga over the movie. This is a kid/teen oriented film, but it didn’t do so well for us adults even considering that you get to see ex-Bond guy Pierce Brosnan in centaur form.

OK, so here are the basics : Percy Jackson (Logan Lerman) is your average high-school kid (he’s younger in the book) leading a fairly normal life, when one day he is attacked by a devil/dragon “fury” (my daughter tells me that there are 3 of them, although the other 2 remain un-named and appear in later books) who demands that he return Zeus’s lightning bolt. Jackson of course has no clue what this is all about, but soon learns that he is a demi-God; although his mother is a human, his father is Poseidon the Greek God of Water.

For his own protection he must go live at Camp Half-Blood, where other demi-Gods like him (apparently the Gods have a penchant for “hooking up” with humans) live and train. Also Zeus thinks that Poseidon’s son i.e.; Percy has stolen his lightning bolt, and wants him to return it else there will be war, which will have catastrophic effects on earth. The film then takes off with Percy sneaking out of the camp with his satyr “protector” and old friend Grover, and newly made friend Annabeth (daughter of Athena), to prove his innocence and rescue his mother Sally (Catherine Keener) from Hell (literally).

The trio on the way to Hades’s netherworld wander through Medusa’s garden, the Parthenon at Nashville and Las Vegas, and come across many enemies. There’s Uma Thurman doing a superb impression of Medusa in sun-glasses. Ever wonder how the mythical Greek Gods would look if brought forward to modern day ? I imagine they’d take a leaf out of Thurman’s book, and appear clad in leather, and very Trinity-ish. That coif really suited her; she should probably think about it for every day !

This film dragged in parts – all that needless wandering around in Medusa’s garden really grated after a while. Plus inspite of some excellent casting like Medusa, Hades, Grover (Brandon T. Jackson) and Mr. Brunner (Brosnan’s character), the main lead wasn’t all he could have been. Logan, who looks like a younger version of Josh Hartnett, seemed unable to breathe life into his character. I couldn’t sympathize with his character or his predicament.

The demi-Gods seemed kind of nonchalant about their lineage and their powers, and Camp Half-blood looked a little silly and a lot like play-acting; they practice with medieval weapons, apparently not having heard of how a sword won’t match up against modern-day firearms. But then that’s probably Rick Riordan and not the film. Plus what’s with the medieval costumes? You’d think that if Medusa could go all hip in leather, the good guys could sport some trendy God-wear !

As far as special effects go this was upto par – there were demons, a fury, Medusa’s roiling hair, satyrs, centaurs, a 5 headed dog and Hades in all his inhumanly glory, and that’s probably what carried this film. Minus the special effects, I would categorize this film as B-grade, suffering from a weak script, wishy-washy characters and a lack of much needed emotion and gusto.

Posted in 2010, english, family-friendly, hollywood, sci-fi, watchable | Comments Off on Movie Review : Percy Jackson and the Olympians – The lightning thief

Movie Review : My name is Khan

My Name Is KhanRating : Above average (3.5/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2010
Running time : 2 hours 45 minutes
Director : Karan Johar
Cast : Shahrukh Khan, Kajol, Zarina Wahab, Jimmy Shergill, Sonya Jehan, Tanay Chheda, Navneet Nishaan, Vinay Pathak, Parvin Dabbas, Arif Zakaria
Kid rating : PG-13




MY NAME IS KHAN : A KHAN-DO FILM !

You know when you go to watch a Karan Johar film, you go in there expecting lots of color, song and dance, beautiful cinematography and people, all coated nicely with that extra helping of sugary-sweet emotion. It’s overdone, and milked to kingdom come, but it’s classic Karan Johar, and you can’t take him seriously. He has defined a new genre of candy-floss cinema, which I can tolerate maybe, but never quite applaud.

All that said, lately Johar has been trying to move towards “serious” cinema – “Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna” being a mixture of Joharesque-joie-de-vivre and a semblance of a “realistic” story. “My name is Khan” walks the same path moving Johar that much closer to the “serious” cinema category.

The story of MNIK is one of hope and tolerance, and it’s main character is Rizwan Khan (Shahrukh Khan), an autistic (specifically Asperger’s Syndrome) man, full of goodness. Brought up by his loving, tolerant mother (Zarina Wahab), Rizwan moves to the United States to live with his brother (Jimmy Shergill). There Muslim Rizwan meets Hindu Mandira (Kajol) and hopes for a happy life with her. However when 9/11 happens, their tenuous relationship is threatened . . .

MNIK is quite well-written, so much so that even when you know that Johar is squeezing in every tear-jerking trick in the book, you cannot stop your eyes from welling up. A big reason for that is Rizwan Khan, a well-drawn character, who because of his autistic condition, has the ability to NOT read between the lines. A straightforward, guileless person, Rizwan possesses the ultimate gift; he speaks the truth, come what may. Shahrukh, who is naturally given to twitches and that hyper-buzz of excessive energy, channels it very effectively to portray Rizwan.

A slimmer Kajol, who is seen with SRK after many years, glows with effervescent feel-goodness, like she always has. Now Kajol, who may not in truth be the most beauteous of all women, is still a cinematographer’s dream, conveying with that one raised uni-brow all that is required of her, and more. In fact I must applaud the entire cast, from the very in-your-face Navneet Nishan, to Sonya Jehan (playing the brother’s wife), to Zarina Wahab to make this film what it is.

But there are problems. While Johar is well-intentioned, he does not quite succeed in maintaining the balance between “realism” and his brand of fantasy. Thus Rizwan, who we already love, and do, because he is caught just like the rest of his us, in an unforgiving world, is caricature-ishly turned into a super-hero of sorts when he goes into savior mode, rescuing stranded Americans from their flooded town (incident inspired by Katrinagate ?). Not only that, but his family and friends too follow him into the flooded waters pretty easily, but hey, the US Coast Guard, or FEMA cannot/will not get through. A most definite no-no, and very, very hard to believe, this flight of fantasy ruined the delicate balance of the film, and takes the quality down a couple of notches.

Other than that, this film has strong direction and some very beautiful songs. I must also mention that it pays tribute to the classic “Jaane bhi do yaaron” via it’s much loved anthem “Hum honge kamyaab” (which is actually based on this song). MNIK packs enough star power to ensure that it does well at the box-office; for a one-time watch, this film will do.

Kid-wise : This flm has some pretty violent scenes involving kids, make this film unsuitable for younger children. Allusions to the sexual act although nothing overt is shown, might bring up questions in curious minds. Also unless your children are well-informed on world issues, racial/religious tensions, some of this film might go right above thier heads.

Posted in 2010, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13, recommended | 3 Comments

Upcoming films : February 2010

Quite a few highly anticipated films hitting the big screen this month, and quite a few of them of the “Thriller” category. “My name is Khan” is probably the most hyped film of all of them, what with the whole anti-SRK campaign by the Shiv Sena.

There’s also “Karthik calling Karthik” the doppelganger mystery. Bachchan’s upcoming “thriller” looks like a remake of “21”. As for “Toh baat pakki”, I have seen a few trailers of it in which Tabu appears after a pretty long time (although doesn’t Mahie Gill look just like her ?) and it looks like fun. And wow, there’s actually a Hindi Horror film in the fray ! Here’s the low-down on all of them :

Release Date Film Title Genre Director Actors
Feb 12 My name is Khan Drama Karan Johar Shahrukh Khan, Kajol, Tanay Chheda
Feb 19 Thanks Maa Drama Irfan Kamal Alok Nath, Raghuveer Yadav, Barry John
Feb 19 Click Horror/Drama Sangeeth Sivan Shreyas Talpade, Rehan Khan, Sneha Ullal, Chunky Pandey
Feb 19 Toh baat pakki Comedy/Romance Kedar Shinde Tabu, Sharman Joshi, Ayub Khan, Uvika Chaudhary
Feb 26 Karthik calling Karthik Drama/Thriller Vijay Lalwani Farhan Akhtar, Deepika Padukone, Ram Kapoor, Shefali Shetty
Feb 26 Teen Patti Thriller Leena Yadav Ben Kingsley, Amitabh Bachchan, Madhavan, Ajay Devgan, Raima Sen
Posted in bollywood, Previews | Tagged | Comments Off on Upcoming films : February 2010

Movie Review : Ishqiya

Rating : Above average (3.75/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2010
Running time : 2 hours
Director : Abhishek Chaubey
Cast : Naseeruddin Shah, Vidya Balan, Arshad Warsi
Kid rating : PG-13




ISHQIYA : SMALL TOWN TRAVAILS, A LITTLE UNDER-DONE !

The dusty dilapidated roads of UP, the well-lined faces of the people-who-will-do-great-things, the realistic gaana-bajana, and the oh-so-sharply-apt dialogues; now where I have seen this before ? Yes, of course I have stumbled across, or more precisely into a theater screening a Vishal Bharadwaj film. He is actually the producer here, but the film bears his touches nonetheless.

I greatly anticipated Ishqiya, but post-movie I can see why it’s losing out on the mass market. I still cannot fathom why Rann of all films is taking it to the cleaners, but some mysteries just are. Moving on with the film at hand though, Ishqiya stars three of my favorite actors – Naseeruddin Shah, Arshad Warsi and Vidya Balan. Shah and Warsi are small-time con artists. They are also uncle-nephew – Shah the greying Khalu-jaan and Warsi the energetic Babban. We meet the duo on the run from another con-man, from whom they have stolen a large amount of money. The man conned is understandably angry, and follows them around, with his gang and his ever-ringing cell-phone in tow.

Short on friends, Khalu-jaan and Babban land up in Gorakhpur, assuming that they will find asylum with a former acquaintance Verma-ji, and be able to lie low in the backwaters of eastern UP. However they discover that Vermaji has left for his heavenly abode, and the welcoming party consists solely of his rather comely widow Krishna (Balan). Krishna takes them in. All should have been well, but romance blooms and the loot goes missing. Love and lucre never did mix.

Ishqiya is that genre of film, where the story unfolds slowly, and we are never quite sure of the motives that drive its characters to perfidy and damnation. Debut director Chaubey does his job well; he weaves a multi-textured tale, which has romance, crime, drama and betrayal. The film is full of detailed flourishes – the kohl in Babban’s eyes, the touch of UP-ite vernacular, that realistic small-time-criminal jargon – all building ambience very well.

The three leading actors do very well for themselves; each one impeccable, from the fallible Khalu-jaan, to the soft-hearted thug Babban, to the wily widow Krishna. The setting is great – where else but in the dark, unkempt villages of UP, where hand-made pistols come aplenty, and thugs abound, could one situate a crime drama? The film has a great cast, and melodious music. Still it falters (and oh! what a bummer that is !).

Bharadwaj’s previous productions have always been strong on story. Whether it be Omkara or Maqbool, his crime dramas have always sizzled with passion, a passion which springs from strong, simple motivations. In Ishqiya however Bharadwaj, who was one of the story-writers, cobbles together a convoluted climax. Although the film starts off strong, and takes off once we are privy to Krishna’s rather ambiguous loyalties, it falters post-interval with some very shaky twists in the storyline.

Moreover Ishqiya’s protagonists never quite come into their own. Babban and Khalu-jaan as subtly detailed as they were could have been developed into characters who would have filled every deserted, dark corner of the film with feisty angst. Instead they appear almost diminutive in their passion, never quite rising up to grab our complete attention. Another thing I found lacking was a strong background score, something which probably contributed to the muted emotions in the film.

All-in-all, as good as it was, Ishqiya lacked the oomph, the punch, the energy required to make me give this any more than a 3.75 on the rating scale.

Kid-wise : This is a definite PG-13, with plenty of profanities and the not-so-subtle sexual hints.

Posted in 2010, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13, recommended | Tagged | 3 Comments