Movie Preview : Road, Movie

Dev Benegal’s latest in quite a while “Road, movie” hits theatres March 5th. The film premiered at the 2009 Toronto Film Festival, and has been doing the film festival circuit since. 95 minutes long, and starring Abhay Deol, Satish Kaushik, Tannishtha Chatterjee and Yashpal Sharma, the film is about a young man who, unenthused about joining his father’s hair oil business, volunteers for a trip across the desert in an old battered Chevy. Little does he know that the journey will change his life.

The film is produced by Ross Katz (Lost in translation). I’ve seen Benegal’s “Split Wide Open”, which I’m not gaga about. “Road,movie” seems to have gotten rave reviews, and seeing how Abhay Deol picks his films, this has got to be interesting.

Posted in bollywood, drama, Previews | Tagged , | Comments Off on Movie Preview : Road, Movie

Movie Review : Percy Jackson and the Olympians – The lightning thief

Uma Thurman as Medusa

Since the kids were champing at the bit to see this film, weeks before it was even released (superb marketing – everyone knew that it was coming) the day after it released, we did. Now I have not a clue about the son of Poseidon a.k.a Percy Jackson, unlike the kids who’ve read the series, and went gaga over the movie. This is a kid/teen oriented film, but it didn’t do so well for us adults even considering that you get to see ex-Bond guy Pierce Brosnan in centaur form.

OK, so here are the basics : Percy Jackson (Logan Lerman) is your average high-school kid (he’s younger in the book) leading a fairly normal life, when one day he is attacked by a devil/dragon “fury” (my daughter tells me that there are 3 of them, although the other 2 remain un-named and appear in later books) who demands that he return Zeus’s lightning bolt. Jackson of course has no clue what this is all about, but soon learns that he is a demi-God; although his mother is a human, his father is Poseidon the Greek God of Water.

For his own protection he must go live at Camp Half-Blood, where other demi-Gods like him (apparently the Gods have a penchant for “hooking up” with humans) live and train. Also Zeus thinks that Poseidon’s son i.e.; Percy has stolen his lightning bolt, and wants him to return it else there will be war, which will have catastrophic effects on earth. The film then takes off with Percy sneaking out of the camp with his satyr “protector” and old friend Grover, and newly made friend Annabeth (daughter of Athena), to prove his innocence and rescue his mother Sally (Catherine Keener) from Hell (literally).

The trio on the way to Hades’s netherworld wander through Medusa’s garden, the Parthenon at Nashville and Las Vegas, and come across many enemies. There’s Uma Thurman doing a superb impression of Medusa in sun-glasses. Ever wonder how the mythical Greek Gods would look if brought forward to modern day ? I imagine they’d take a leaf out of Thurman’s book, and appear clad in leather, and very Trinity-ish. That coif really suited her; she should probably think about it for every day !

This film dragged in parts – all that needless wandering around in Medusa’s garden really grated after a while. Plus inspite of some excellent casting like Medusa, Hades, Grover (Brandon T. Jackson) and Mr. Brunner (Brosnan’s character), the main lead wasn’t all he could have been. Logan, who looks like a younger version of Josh Hartnett, seemed unable to breathe life into his character. I couldn’t sympathize with his character or his predicament.

The demi-Gods seemed kind of nonchalant about their lineage and their powers, and Camp Half-blood looked a little silly and a lot like play-acting; they practice with medieval weapons, apparently not having heard of how a sword won’t match up against modern-day firearms. But then that’s probably Rick Riordan and not the film. Plus what’s with the medieval costumes? You’d think that if Medusa could go all hip in leather, the good guys could sport some trendy God-wear !

As far as special effects go this was upto par – there were demons, a fury, Medusa’s roiling hair, satyrs, centaurs, a 5 headed dog and Hades in all his inhumanly glory, and that’s probably what carried this film. Minus the special effects, I would categorize this film as B-grade, suffering from a weak script, wishy-washy characters and a lack of much needed emotion and gusto.

Posted in 2010, english, family-friendly, hollywood, sci-fi, watchable | Comments Off on Movie Review : Percy Jackson and the Olympians – The lightning thief

Movie Review : My name is Khan

My Name Is KhanRating : Above average (3.5/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2010
Running time : 2 hours 45 minutes
Director : Karan Johar
Cast : Shahrukh Khan, Kajol, Zarina Wahab, Jimmy Shergill, Sonya Jehan, Tanay Chheda, Navneet Nishaan, Vinay Pathak, Parvin Dabbas, Arif Zakaria
Kid rating : PG-13




MY NAME IS KHAN : A KHAN-DO FILM !

You know when you go to watch a Karan Johar film, you go in there expecting lots of color, song and dance, beautiful cinematography and people, all coated nicely with that extra helping of sugary-sweet emotion. It’s overdone, and milked to kingdom come, but it’s classic Karan Johar, and you can’t take him seriously. He has defined a new genre of candy-floss cinema, which I can tolerate maybe, but never quite applaud.

All that said, lately Johar has been trying to move towards “serious” cinema – “Kabhi Alvida Na Kehna” being a mixture of Joharesque-joie-de-vivre and a semblance of a “realistic” story. “My name is Khan” walks the same path moving Johar that much closer to the “serious” cinema category.

The story of MNIK is one of hope and tolerance, and it’s main character is Rizwan Khan (Shahrukh Khan), an autistic (specifically Asperger’s Syndrome) man, full of goodness. Brought up by his loving, tolerant mother (Zarina Wahab), Rizwan moves to the United States to live with his brother (Jimmy Shergill). There Muslim Rizwan meets Hindu Mandira (Kajol) and hopes for a happy life with her. However when 9/11 happens, their tenuous relationship is threatened . . .

MNIK is quite well-written, so much so that even when you know that Johar is squeezing in every tear-jerking trick in the book, you cannot stop your eyes from welling up. A big reason for that is Rizwan Khan, a well-drawn character, who because of his autistic condition, has the ability to NOT read between the lines. A straightforward, guileless person, Rizwan possesses the ultimate gift; he speaks the truth, come what may. Shahrukh, who is naturally given to twitches and that hyper-buzz of excessive energy, channels it very effectively to portray Rizwan.

A slimmer Kajol, who is seen with SRK after many years, glows with effervescent feel-goodness, like she always has. Now Kajol, who may not in truth be the most beauteous of all women, is still a cinematographer’s dream, conveying with that one raised uni-brow all that is required of her, and more. In fact I must applaud the entire cast, from the very in-your-face Navneet Nishan, to Sonya Jehan (playing the brother’s wife), to Zarina Wahab to make this film what it is.

But there are problems. While Johar is well-intentioned, he does not quite succeed in maintaining the balance between “realism” and his brand of fantasy. Thus Rizwan, who we already love, and do, because he is caught just like the rest of his us, in an unforgiving world, is caricature-ishly turned into a super-hero of sorts when he goes into savior mode, rescuing stranded Americans from their flooded town (incident inspired by Katrinagate ?). Not only that, but his family and friends too follow him into the flooded waters pretty easily, but hey, the US Coast Guard, or FEMA cannot/will not get through. A most definite no-no, and very, very hard to believe, this flight of fantasy ruined the delicate balance of the film, and takes the quality down a couple of notches.

Other than that, this film has strong direction and some very beautiful songs. I must also mention that it pays tribute to the classic “Jaane bhi do yaaron” via it’s much loved anthem “Hum honge kamyaab” (which is actually based on this song). MNIK packs enough star power to ensure that it does well at the box-office; for a one-time watch, this film will do.

Kid-wise : This flm has some pretty violent scenes involving kids, make this film unsuitable for younger children. Allusions to the sexual act although nothing overt is shown, might bring up questions in curious minds. Also unless your children are well-informed on world issues, racial/religious tensions, some of this film might go right above thier heads.

Posted in 2010, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13, recommended | 3 Comments

Upcoming films : February 2010

Quite a few highly anticipated films hitting the big screen this month, and quite a few of them of the “Thriller” category. “My name is Khan” is probably the most hyped film of all of them, what with the whole anti-SRK campaign by the Shiv Sena.

There’s also “Karthik calling Karthik” the doppelganger mystery. Bachchan’s upcoming “thriller” looks like a remake of “21”. As for “Toh baat pakki”, I have seen a few trailers of it in which Tabu appears after a pretty long time (although doesn’t Mahie Gill look just like her ?) and it looks like fun. And wow, there’s actually a Hindi Horror film in the fray ! Here’s the low-down on all of them :

Release Date Film Title Genre Director Actors
Feb 12 My name is Khan Drama Karan Johar Shahrukh Khan, Kajol, Tanay Chheda
Feb 19 Thanks Maa Drama Irfan Kamal Alok Nath, Raghuveer Yadav, Barry John
Feb 19 Click Horror/Drama Sangeeth Sivan Shreyas Talpade, Rehan Khan, Sneha Ullal, Chunky Pandey
Feb 19 Toh baat pakki Comedy/Romance Kedar Shinde Tabu, Sharman Joshi, Ayub Khan, Uvika Chaudhary
Feb 26 Karthik calling Karthik Drama/Thriller Vijay Lalwani Farhan Akhtar, Deepika Padukone, Ram Kapoor, Shefali Shetty
Feb 26 Teen Patti Thriller Leena Yadav Ben Kingsley, Amitabh Bachchan, Madhavan, Ajay Devgan, Raima Sen
Posted in bollywood, Previews | Tagged | Comments Off on Upcoming films : February 2010

Movie Review : Ishqiya

Rating : Above average (3.75/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2010
Running time : 2 hours
Director : Abhishek Chaubey
Cast : Naseeruddin Shah, Vidya Balan, Arshad Warsi
Kid rating : PG-13




ISHQIYA : SMALL TOWN TRAVAILS, A LITTLE UNDER-DONE !

The dusty dilapidated roads of UP, the well-lined faces of the people-who-will-do-great-things, the realistic gaana-bajana, and the oh-so-sharply-apt dialogues; now where I have seen this before ? Yes, of course I have stumbled across, or more precisely into a theater screening a Vishal Bharadwaj film. He is actually the producer here, but the film bears his touches nonetheless.

I greatly anticipated Ishqiya, but post-movie I can see why it’s losing out on the mass market. I still cannot fathom why Rann of all films is taking it to the cleaners, but some mysteries just are. Moving on with the film at hand though, Ishqiya stars three of my favorite actors – Naseeruddin Shah, Arshad Warsi and Vidya Balan. Shah and Warsi are small-time con artists. They are also uncle-nephew – Shah the greying Khalu-jaan and Warsi the energetic Babban. We meet the duo on the run from another con-man, from whom they have stolen a large amount of money. The man conned is understandably angry, and follows them around, with his gang and his ever-ringing cell-phone in tow.

Short on friends, Khalu-jaan and Babban land up in Gorakhpur, assuming that they will find asylum with a former acquaintance Verma-ji, and be able to lie low in the backwaters of eastern UP. However they discover that Vermaji has left for his heavenly abode, and the welcoming party consists solely of his rather comely widow Krishna (Balan). Krishna takes them in. All should have been well, but romance blooms and the loot goes missing. Love and lucre never did mix.

Ishqiya is that genre of film, where the story unfolds slowly, and we are never quite sure of the motives that drive its characters to perfidy and damnation. Debut director Chaubey does his job well; he weaves a multi-textured tale, which has romance, crime, drama and betrayal. The film is full of detailed flourishes – the kohl in Babban’s eyes, the touch of UP-ite vernacular, that realistic small-time-criminal jargon – all building ambience very well.

The three leading actors do very well for themselves; each one impeccable, from the fallible Khalu-jaan, to the soft-hearted thug Babban, to the wily widow Krishna. The setting is great – where else but in the dark, unkempt villages of UP, where hand-made pistols come aplenty, and thugs abound, could one situate a crime drama? The film has a great cast, and melodious music. Still it falters (and oh! what a bummer that is !).

Bharadwaj’s previous productions have always been strong on story. Whether it be Omkara or Maqbool, his crime dramas have always sizzled with passion, a passion which springs from strong, simple motivations. In Ishqiya however Bharadwaj, who was one of the story-writers, cobbles together a convoluted climax. Although the film starts off strong, and takes off once we are privy to Krishna’s rather ambiguous loyalties, it falters post-interval with some very shaky twists in the storyline.

Moreover Ishqiya’s protagonists never quite come into their own. Babban and Khalu-jaan as subtly detailed as they were could have been developed into characters who would have filled every deserted, dark corner of the film with feisty angst. Instead they appear almost diminutive in their passion, never quite rising up to grab our complete attention. Another thing I found lacking was a strong background score, something which probably contributed to the muted emotions in the film.

All-in-all, as good as it was, Ishqiya lacked the oomph, the punch, the energy required to make me give this any more than a 3.75 on the rating scale.

Kid-wise : This is a definite PG-13, with plenty of profanities and the not-so-subtle sexual hints.

Posted in 2010, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13, recommended | Tagged | 3 Comments

Movie Review : Sunshine Cleaning

Sunshine Cleaning

Sunshine cleaning premiered at the 2008 Sundance Film Festival and it took about an year for this film to get to the theatres, and even when there, it was a pretty short run. I’ve been meaning to see this for a while, chiefly because of the cast which features in the main lead, the wonderful Amy Adams (of “Doubt” and “Julie and Julia”).

OK, for starters, this film is about Rose (Adams) and her sister Norah (Emily Blunt). Rose, a cheerleader at school, is now working as a maid. She would like to get her real estate license to move up in life, but that’s sort of hampered by bills, and familial issues. Plus Rose is having an affair with her high-school boyfriend (he was the local jock) Mac(Steve Zahn) who married another girl.

Tremulous Rose is frustrated with her dead-end life although she tries to put on a brave face, and when a new business opportunity pops up, she decides to give it a go. The title of the film seems cheery enough, although what it is, is the name of the Cleaning business that Rose Korlowski starts. And not just any ordinary cleaning business this ! It is a post-mortem, post-death/tragedy clean-up business where they must get into a crime scene after the police are done with it (lots of gore, blood spatters, and other bodily fluid involved) and make it all nice and shiny again. And from the looks of some these clean-up sites, it doesn’t look as though they were that pretty to begin with.

Rose and Norah in Sunshine Cleaning

Well, Rose and Norah learn to get used to it, and it seems like this well-paying gig really might be the answer to their problems. But life never is that simple, is it ?

This film was beautifully directed, and the casting oh-so-perfect. Adams as Rose is just the right amount of vulnerable, eyes bright with unshed tears, and the whole “I’m-going to-be-so-brave-even-though-my-life-is-going-down-the-toilet” routine down pat. I mean, a few frames into the movie and I’m already sympathetic towards the down-on-her-luck, pretty, plucky Rose. Emily Blunt as irresponsible sister Norah is just as good. Then there’s Alan Arkin playing the loser Dad, a wry reprise of his role in “Little Miss Sunshine”.

The film as it dwells on it’s protagnists difficult circumstances is stark, and grim, but handled with a sympathetic touch. There is also a little sub-plot about Rose and Norah’s mother, but what this film really is about is squeaking through life in a dignified fashion, even though it seems you’re walking a fine line, and with Rose, so, so close to hurtling down the edge into despair.

Kidwise this is grisly at times, has language issues, and nudity/sexual situations. However, for all you non-kids, this is a pretty good film, feisty, thoughtful and poignant. I recommend it.

Posted in drama, english, hollywood, recommended | 2 Comments

Best films of 2009

This year I decided to try something different. So, instead of giving you a plain old list, here are the Top 10 movies of 2009, in descending order (#1 is best), as a Youtube movie – it’s more of a slideshow, but still 🙂

The Top 10 films in “list” form (with links) will be available on my “Best Films by Year” page, so please go check out the individual reviews. Those that didn’t make the cut, but are worth a watch are :
Kurbaan
What’s your rashee ?
Gulaal
New York
Dil bole hadippa !

Also for earlier years, here’s the Best of 2008, 2007 and 2006.

Posted in 2009, annual roundup, Best hindi movies, bollywood, lists, recommended, Top 10 | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Movie Review : Avatar

Jake with his AvatarJames Cameron magnum opus about tall blue men. A film yes, but more of an experience. With all the hype on TV, and everyone raving about “Avatar” I finally saw this on IMAX 3D. And I have to agree – it was mind-blowingly awesome. It really was; it is hard for me to use mind-blowing and awesome in the same sentence (my half-life reduces considerably each time.)

I went into the packed theater expecting out-of-the-world special effects, but having an impression that there wasn’t much to the story. Well, I got the expected quota of CGI, but what I also got was a meaty (and somewhat clichéd) story of right vs. wrong. Cameron constructs an alien planet Pandora, populated by the indigenous Na’vi, who are 10 feet tall blue men and women. Then he brings in the bad guys, namely us, the humans who have ravaged and almost brought to ruin their home planet earth, and have now set their sights upon obtaining the precious resources of Pandora. The problem ? This valuable substance, “Unobtanium” (I kid you not) is deep in the bowels of Pandora, and to get at it, the Na’vi settlements uptop will have to be moved. And the blue men aren’t that keen on moving.

OK then, who’s representing the bad guys ? Well, there’s the money-crunching head honcho Parker Selfridge (Giovanni Ribisi) who’s dead set on obtaining the precious ore at any cost. His right hand man is Colonel Miles Quaritch, the military boss, who’s been sending out the heavy artillery. There are also the humans who wish to peacefully coexist with the Na’vi, and they are the scientific researchers, headed by Dr. Grace Augustine (Sigourney Weaver). They are running an “Avatar Program” in which they breed a human-Na’vi hybrid species. Each Avatar is based off of a human researcher, and this researcher can then “link up” or control his/her Avatar. When linked up they are one with the Avatar, and without a link-up, the Avatar is but a soul-less body (this sort of reminded me of the “link-ups” in the “Matrix”).

Our hero, ex-marine Jake Sully, played by Sam Worthington, who although he’s a paraplegic, has been recruited in place of his now dead twin, because he shares the same DNA. His twin was being trained specifically for the Avatar Program, and had a corresponding Avatar which Jake will now control. When linked up to his Avatar Jake is an athletic 10 foot tall blue Na’vi with full use of all his limbs, an ability he does not possess in the real world .

NeytiriTenacious Jake starts off in the program as a spy for Quaritch, but once accepted into the Na’vi fold, jumps ship and starts rooting for the Na’vi. Also instrumental in his change of heart is the fact that Jake, in his avatar body, has fallen in love with the beautiful, native Neytiri (Zoe Saldana). The Na’vi are portrayed as a relatively primitive race (bows/arrows) of hunters/gatherers. They have little technology but respect life in all it’s forms and wish to live in harmony with nature and it’s goodness. When the humans move in with their bull-dozers and try uprooting the Na’vi forcibly, Jake must lead the primitive race in, what seems to be, a losing battle.

This is the classic “hero” story, where the good guy finally finds his way, and must struggle against great odds to do the right thing. It is told here with just the right amount of emotional impact, and enough “masala” to keep it interesting.

The film tells the story of Pandora, and also depicts very imaginatively the local flora and fauna. There is minute attention to detail; a lot of the Pandorian wildlife is similar to earth animals, but more ferocious and possessing extra limbs. There are horses with ant-eater like snouts, dog-like creatures which seem like rabid wolves, and even seeds of the tree of life which float about like delicate, wispy jellyfish. With all the fantastic cgi, creative imagery and the bold, iridescent colors Pandora is beautiful; a lush rain-forest seen through color filters.The indigenous Pandorian people, the planet-loving Na’vi so into the don’t-destroy-our-planet routine, seem to be a based off of African-native American peoples, striving to save their lands from the greedy, grubby invaders.

I’m overwhelmed by this film, but there are things to quibble about if you are so inclined. Although the characters are fairly well-developed they are painted in broad swathes of black and white – the bad guys are oh-so-evil, and the good guys are so good, you could probably gift them halos for Christmas. Stuff like this I would have complained about if this were any old film, but amidst the grandness of this film experience it seems minor.

Avatar (Two-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo) [Blu-ray]Cameron succeeds in balancing out the film elements just so. The casting is great. The actors do pretty well, Worthington does good, and Weaver, seeming extraordinarily tall makes a post-Terminator stop-over as the wise-cracking, Dr. Grace-Goody-2-shoes. Zoe Saldana only appears in a Na’vi form as Neytiri, and is effective. The music of the film really helps develop the mood, and heightens impact when the bulldozers come calling into Na’vi land. I couldn’t fault the direction, the pace or the screenplay.

I liked the Terminator series, although I couldn’t stand Titanic – thought it massively over-rated. This one though, I will always remember.

P.S. : A note on the word “Avatar”. It originates from Sanskrit, and it’s rough translation into English is “incarnation”.

Posted in 2010, english, fantasy, hollywood, recommended, sci-fi | 6 Comments

Movie Review : 3 Idiots

Rating : Above average (3.6/5)
Genre : Comedy / Drama
Year : 2009
Running time : 2 hours 50 minutes
Director : Rajkumar Hirani
Cast : Aamir Khan, Kareena Kapoor, Boman Irani, Sharman Joshi, Madhavan, Mona Singh
Kid rating : PG




THREE IDIOTS : A LIGHT ENTERTAINER

“3 Idiots” is a story about friendship, about friends, and what they mean to us. In that, it is similar to “Dil Chahta hai”. But that’s where the similarity ends. Because while DCH was a much loved, and delicately nuanced child of it’s debuting director Farhan Akhtar, “3 Idiots” is a boisterous romp through the travails of life and love and camaraderie, from a director not known for his subtlety. Thus “Three Idiots” ends up being a wannabe soulful film, with the heart of Munnabhai (gold) and the spark of Aamir (old but not jaded).

The film starts off with 2 Idiots, Farhan Qureshi (Madhavan) and Raju Rastogi (Sharman) setting out in search of the 3rd, Ranchhoddas Shamaldas Chanchad (Amir). As they travel, the film veers backwards and forwards into flashbacks, and we become privy to the three’s friendship in Engineering College. Of the three only Rancho wants to study to learn, Farhan yearns to be a photographer, and Raju is burdened by the fear of not meeting parental expectations. To make college life more interesting, we also have the quirky Institute Director, Professor Viru Sahastrabuddhe (Boman Irani), and his lovely daughter Pia (Kareena). All good things however come to an end, and the friends must separate. Will they ever all be together again ?

Amir plays a college kid here, and while he’s actually 40+ he does manage his character quite well. As Rancho he is an avid learner, with a rambunctious air and a straightforward manner of speaking. Madhavan and Sharman also do well as his devoted side-kicks. Kareena is fabulous as bespectacled Pia, and Boman Irani is quite the eccentric professor. The direction is adequate, the dialogues apt, and the music hum-able. This is also quite a unique story, and it is told pretty well, with the flashbacks well-woven with real-time.

However, 3I can never actually make up it’s mind about what it’s trying to be. A comedy with “intelligent” leanings or a thoughtful, coming-of-age film with lapses of reality ? This film has both elements; it tries to weave a realistic story, but the story has some unbelievable events which take away from the film. Each film is different because of it’s director, and while Hirani is a talented director, and his films generally clean and classy, they tend to be a little short on character development, and concentrate more on eliciting the guffaws. This movie is no different; thus while it had the potential to be another “Dil Chahta hai”, it doesn’t quite get there.

The characters in 3I are an interesting and varied bunch. Rancho is the one around whom the story turns, and his friends are no less. It is a pity then that these characters aren’t fleshed out very well. 3I turns out to have way more story than buildup; it seems that we are thrown into the tumult of events, without being privy to important background information, which lessens the impact of the emotions being shown. Seemingly moving portrayals like that of Raju’s poverty stricken family are reduced to caricatures. So when the director decides to milk the emotions that he chooses to, one is left a little underwhelmed and undecided as to whether these are “real” emotions or just other attempts at “comedy”. This imbalance, some emotions underdone, and some just so pat that you doubt their genuineness, are the film’s undoing.

This still is an entertaining film, pulling it’s weight because of it’s cast, it’s humor, it’s good-heartedness and it’s feel-good bonhomie. Aamir’s star-power, Kareena’s geeky-girl oomph also work in it’s favor. All that said, I will also say that “3 Idiots” didn’t live upto my expectations, but if you are looking for nothing more than a light Friday night entertainer, this is well worth the money.

“3 Idiots” is a fairly clean film kidwise, but does show lots of men in their underwear. It also has a lip-lock and some diagrammatic depictions of child-birth – nothing queasy (except maybe the use of the suction ?), but if you have curious children, they’ll probably have questions, so be warned :-).

Posted in 2009, all-in-one, bollywood, family-friendly, rating-PG, recommended | 12 Comments

Movie Review : Paa

Paa (New Amitabh Hindi Movie / Bollywood Film / Indian Cinema / DVD)Rating : Average (3/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2009
Running time : 2 hours 10 minutes
Director : R. Balki
Cast : Amitabh Bachhan, Abhishek Bachchan, Vidya Balan, Arundhati Nag
Kid rating : PG




PAA : GIMMICKY CASTING DIMINISHES FILM !

The film is about a progeria inflicted, precocious child Auro, who finds out about his absentee father. Amitabh Bachhan plays the child, and Abhishek the father (that is the touted USP of this movie – although I can’t agree). Vidya Balan played the mother of the child Auro. Watching the promos for this film, before it’s release, and seeing the hype and the build-up because it was Amitabh playing Auro, I wasn’t at all sure about the quality of the film. It’s difficult looking at Auro, to see Amitabh in him, due to the prosthetic makeup, but I “knew” that it was him underneath all that. And that, frankly weird-ed me out.

This is not a long tale, nor does it span any great time – it is more anecdotal, beginning at the time Auro gets to meet his father, although neither one of them is aware of the relationship. Auro’s friendship with his father grows, and when he comes to know the truth, he does his best to bring his parents together, while he has the time.

Abhishek plays a righteous young politician, out to clean up the political system. Paresh Rawal plays his not so righteous father. Vidya Balan is Amol’s girlfriend at college. The pair split up when she gets pregnant, because Amol wants her to terminate the pregnancy, while she doesn’t. Hence Auro. Fatherless.

Now, at the time the film begins, Auro is a gangly, almost teenager, showing the effects of progeria. Newcomers at his school are taken aback by his appearance, but everyone else in his world – friends, family and teachers love him for what he is, a smart-alecky, precocious kid. And while the smart-aleckiness of Auro’s character is endearing and the dialogues slick and snappy (remember “Cheeni Kum” ?), I’m still put-off that Bachhan Sr. plays the child. While Bachhan is a fine enough actor in the right director’s hands, when roles of this kind are handed to him as obeisance, I find it a little abhorrent (and stuff like this just adds to it). This takes away, in my mind, from the actual focus, and lands the spotlight squarely on THE BACHHAN, instead of the character. Would there be such a hype about the film if Amitabh hadn’t played Auro ?

R. Balki directs this film with finesse, but the pace was too slow. Events happened, progressing minutely, interspersed with some sharp, witty dialogue, and that was pretty much how it went. Yes, the characters have been developed; I most appreciated Balan’s character, as a strongly etched woman, who becomes an unwed mother, sans traditional means of support. Her mother’s role (played by Arundhati Nag) is also well-done. Abhishek is adequate. And Amitabh – yes, he probably followed director’s orders to a T, but because I found the casting so gimmicky, I could not empathize with his character at all. When Auro entered the frame, call me biased, all I could see was Amitabh in makeup.

And when you can’t sympathize with the central character of the film, the one around whom that little on-screen world is built, what does it do for your movie-watching experience ? Exactly. That is how I feel about this film.

Auro’s music is nothing to get excited about; one song in particular reminded me of the title track from the film Anjali (Telugu). But yes, the film is clean, and comes across as a film of quality. It’s a pity then that the casting is gimmicky, well done this could have been a truly moving film.

Posted in 2009, bollywood, drama | 2 Comments