Review : Oye Lucky Lucky Oye

ollo
Rating : Above Average (3.2/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2008
Running time : 2 hour 15 minutes
Director : Dibakar Banerjee
Cast : Abhay Deol, Neetu Chandra, Paresh Rawal, Archana Puransingh, Manu Rishi, Anurag Arora
Kid rating : PG

OYE LUCKY LUCKY OYE : GREAT DETAIL, LITTLE STORY !

After reading Navdeep Singh’s early review of “OLLO” at PFC, I wanted to see this film the moment it was released here. After all, director Dibakar Banerjee directed the impeccable drama/comedy “Khosla ka Ghosla”, and Navdeep Singh directed that gorgeous foray into desi noir “Manorama six feet under”. They both couldn’t be wrong, could they ?

After watching the 2 hour long OLLO, at the earliest possible time, I have to say that they aren’t wrong, but they aren’t very right either. Of course I went in to the film, buoyed by thoughts of “Khosla ka Ghosla”. Of course I went in to the film relishing the thought of another well-made movie, from a director who knew what he was doing. And while it did turn out to be a well-made film, with exquisite attention to details, and wonderful character development, it definitely did not give me my money’s worth.

Why, oh why, does this film not succeed, you might well ask ? Here’s the short answer – there is no plot. At heart, I’m an old-fashioned girl. I like my films smart and sassy and with a “hook”. The film must have a story, and the story must have a “problem”, i.e.; the hook. The film must hold your attention, and progress(which it does) and RAMP UP (it does not).

OLLO as the title suggests is the story of Lucky, or Lovinder Singh Lucky, a Sardar born in dear old Delhi. And not the swanky side either, this is the Delhi of rooftops studded with TV antennas, open courtyards, and narrow galis. For one familiar with the city, or of the city born, this rendering of much-loved Delhi, warms the cockles of one’s heart. Young Lucky (played marvellously by Manjot Singh) is a the son of a philandering father who’s brought his mistress (whom everyone euphemistically refers to as Auntyji) home to live alongside his wife. Beaten by his father, Lucky is a kid with a false swagger in his step, and a sly word on his lips.

Lucky develops a penchant for trickery, because he wants the finer things in his life, fast. His small-time cons stay with him throught his growing years, only getting honed with time. As a young man, Lucky is an audacious thief, stealing because he can, and because it’s his one-way ticket to every material thing he might covet. His life goes from one small-time heist to another, selling and pawning stolen goods, until there’s only one possible way this could all end . . .

Abhay Deol really does pick off-beat films; from his “Socha na tha” to the very recent “Manorama 6 feet under”, the roles he plays are not the standard Hindi film hero roles at all. As Lucky, Abhay does an excellent job, portraying the “good-natured thief” to the hilt. He holds his own against actor Paresh Rawal. Rawal plays three un-connected roles, and was fault-less in each of them; the only problem I saw lay with his accent, which did not appear to be Punjabi at all (dubbing might have given him more authenticity).

Manu Rishi plays Lucky’s best friend Bangali, and Anurag Arora, with his very true Punjabi/Haryanvi lilt is a Special Branch Officer, in pursuit of Lucky. Neetu Chandra, as Lucky’s lady love, is another excellent actress. Archana Puransingh, played a shrewish Punjabi house-wife, with all the typically Delhi-ite oily, overt posturing. Overall, the film featured an excellent cast.

It is obvious that Banerjee has taken pains with his characters. From the middle-class Dolly (Richa Chaddha), who realises that she is not English-speaking “gentry”, to the apparently gentrified Mrs. Handa (PuranSingh), each role is carefully delineated. The screen-play is solid and dialogues apt. Banerjee makes sly digs at Delhi and it’s class-consciousness as only one familiar with the city and it’s culture can.

This film savors nostalgia. It features old melodies, goes quite retro in the begining with the titles, and makes quite a few references to that charismatic 80s icon, Vinod Khanna. With it’s well-drawn characters you can’t help feeling for, and it’s very charming Delhi, Punjabi (you can call it what you want) feel, this film feels like a well-worn and much-loved garment; you cling to it because it reminds you of a city and a people you might have once known. The only problem here is that this garment is thread-bare.

If you liked this film, you might also like :
– Bunty aur Babli
– Ek chaalis ki last local
– Dil pe mat le yaar

Posted in 2008, bollywood, drama, rating-PG, watchable | 3 Comments

Review : Dostana

dst1
Rating : Above Average (3.6/5)
Genre : Romance/Comedy
Year : 2008
Running time : 2 hour 25 minutes
Director : Tarun Mansukhani
Cast : Priyanka Chopra, Abhishek Bachhan, John Abraham, Kirron Kher, Boman Irani, Sushmita Bundela Mukherjee

Kid rating : PG 13

DOSTANA : A GAY FILM !

Recall the “Kantaben” episode in “Kal ho na ho”. Now concoct a whole film around it, and Voila ! You have “Dostana”, a film about two men pretending to be gay. And because it would be mightily inconvenient to situate such a story in good old, traditional India (some “patriotic” group or other “guardians” of our culture might take offence), the story is set in Miami. Also throw in a nicely proportioned, peppy lass and you now have a full-on Masala film !

The two men in question are Kunal (Abraham) and Sameer – or Sam (Bachchan). One’s a photographer and the other’s a nurse, and they both are inevitable skirt-chasers. Having their fill of women (women seem to fall all over themselves for these two) but lacking housing, both end up trying to rent rooms in an apartment belonging to single, Sindhi lady Neha Melwani (Chopra). However, Ms Melwani and her aunt (Sushmita Mukherjee) will have no men in the apartment, and Kunal and Sam then pretend to be a gay couple to gain admittance.

The three roomies then proceed to become best buddies, with the two men falling in love with Neha. She of course treats them as friends only, and falls in love with her boss Abhimanyu Singh (Deol). So there’s one girl, and three men who want her – and it takes the entire second half for one to win.

“Dostana” opens with a song, featuring some of the fittest bodies in Bollywood. There’s John Abraham, resplendent in bright yellow swim shorts. There’s Shilpa Shetty, she of the well-toned body and long, long legs. Abhishek is left (a little too) hirsute and clothed, which is how we like him. And there’s a bevy of bikini-clad beach beauties, vying for attention. Bright colors, blue skies, and the sea complete the slick, well-glamorized shot.

This opening sort of sets the tone of the film; it does not lack item numbers, or skimpy clothing, and it‘s about happening, hot young things sorting out their life and loves in a happening, hot, young world. Gay desis abound, and are amazingly, out of the closet. Desi folk are chic, work in non-engineering careers, and dress to kill. If you have it, you must flaunt it. Priyanka romps around in short shorts and bikini tops, and looks good doing it. And John Abraham, in one scene, wears only the bare essentials.

The men are into wine and women, but they also, this being Bollywood and all, possess hearts of gold. While I must give the film credit for even raising the notion of gay partnership as a possible relationship, for the desi public, I am also a little perturbed that when it suits it, the characters in this film seem to ooze what can only be described as homophobia. And while desi male sexuality is all out on display – Kunal and Sam sleep around and indulge in one night-stands (and they can still apparently morph into paragons of morality when confronted with true love), the desi woman, Neha, still remains prim, proper, and pristine (and asexual ?), unwilling to even share an apartment with a man.

This film is directed by Mansukhani, but has Karan Johar’s stamp all over it. It is thoroughly glam-med up, vibrant and slick, with well-choreographed numbers. Adequate direction, a shallow but entertaining script, and reasonable acting make this a mucho-masala film. The first half of the film is a breeze; funny, with lots of little well-timed gags. In the second half the film drags a bit, because of predictability – I knew exactly how it was going to end, and it isn’t that hard to guess. No real twists and turns here, except for the completely unexpected man-on-man kiss !

John and Abhishek, display real chemistry, playing off well against each other , and Priyanka does adequately. Kirron Kher hams it up as Sam’s typically Punjabi Mom, who has a hard time accepting her son’s alternative sexuality. Boman Irani is Neha’s out-and-about gay boss, and Bobby Deol, as the straight man in her life, is the third contender for Neha’s love.

“Dostana” is a decent watch. Yes, you do have to accept that in desi filmdom, there is only one kind of sexuality that is accepted, and it’s straight and male. The others (female, gay, lesbian etc. ) might exist but are never quite willingly acknowledged in the desi spectrum, although we might nod our heads and mumble soothing words, when asked, because we are oh-so-broadminded and believe in true love (wherever it might be found).

If you liked this film, you might also like :
– Kabhi alvida na kehna
– Namastey London

Posted in 2008, bollywood, comedy, rating-PG13, romance, watchable | 1 Comment

Review : Drona

drona1
Rating : Below average (2.8/5)
Genre : Drama / Fantasy
Year : 2008
Running time : 2 hours 35 minutes
Director : Goldie Behl
Cast : Priyanka Chopra, Abhishek Bachhan, Jaya Bachchan, KayKay Menon
Kid rating : PG

DRONA : BORING AND TACKY

You know you watch all these foreign fantasy based films, built upon folklore and mythology, and you begin to wonder why there is no desi fantasy/folklore based film. You have whole generatons of people being bred on Amar Chitra Kathas, and if that isn’t material begging to be ripped off, I don’t know what is. Well, wonder no more people, because here comes Drona, or the Deva vs. Asura war in the modern world.

And just as they tell it in the comic book version,the Asuras are still serching for the elixir of Life, or Amrit. The Amrit is being guarded by a long line of “Protectors” or Dronas, the most recent of whom is Aditya. Born in England, and leading a very Harry Potter like life, with his mean aunt and cousin, Aditya (Abhishek) is quite unaware of who he is. Well, one day he does find out, courtesy villain Riz Raizada (KK Menon). And then to the rescue come the hidden minions who help Drona escape from his clutches. Yeah well, the film doesn’t quite end there, because the villain is kind of persistent . . .

Drona’s bodyguard is Sonia, a turbaned, and flowing-robed Priyanka Chopra driving a swanky yellow roadster. This bodyguard, although svelte and fit, has the typical Bollywoodian female’s histrionic traits, with a Babuji hangup; “My Babuji used to say this”, and “My Babuji used to say that”, until I wish the woman would just shut up and get on with the movie. Actually, that was the problem with the all the characters in the film – they all talked too much and did too little.

The story is told partly in flashback, and via animation, which was nicely done. Very Amar-Chitra-Katha-ish, but nice. Once you dig the background, you look forward to the new Drona and his exploits. Unfortunately there are none to talk about (much). Apart from being born Drona, I’m not sure what the hero actually does that shows why he is a hero. We don’t get a feel for who he is, how he thinks or what he feels – thus making it very hard to sympathize with him or give 2 hoots about the film.

Drona2As far as the casting goes, they could have done much better than junior B, and Ms. PoutyLips. Junior B can’t stop glowering since his Sarkar Raj days ; someone should tell him that glowering is not equivalent to acting, i.e.; you can’t replace one with the other. And Ms. PoutyLips didn’t have much to do, except to look pretty, and well, ummm . . . Pouty (and that‘s not really her fault – see her actually act in Fashion). One little shoulder injury, and all the fight goes out of the BodyGuard, leaving in her place the empty shell of the traditional desi woman kow-towing to her man. All hail Patriarchal Bollywood !

Jaya Bahaduri plays her dumpy old self (Wow – I feel strangely mean saying that – but she really is extremely cylindrical and depressed looking in this film) being you know, Wonder Boy’s Mom and all that, and everyone is kind of all in awe of him (I can’t tell why !).

drona30KK Menon plays at being villain. This villain’s evil (yes we anticipated that), but he’s also kind of twisted, and eccentric, and crazy. Now I’m presuming that they wanted him to be scarily eccentric, but they don’t quite manage to pull that off, even though KK is such a fine actor. For one thing – his hair is kind of Tintin like – and I quite liked Tintin. Would you take someone with Tintin-like hair seriously ? No, I mean really ?

tintin01
Jokes apart, this could really have been some film, and it isn’t. This thing had potential – an actual Dev-Asura war in this technological advanced world – just imagine what they could have done ! But no, director Goldie is an old stick-in-the-mud going back to the desi emotional rona-dhona and faux valor. The film has got some special effects which have been nicely done – like the scene in the desert. But the others stink ; it’s a little better than the Ramayan teleserial effects, but not by much. There are no exceptional fight scenes, no wonderful chases to pump up the thrill factor, and really no action. They talk, and they talk and then they talk some more. And they talk lofty too . If only they walked the walk, while they talked the talk.

This film is not paisa-vasool – not by a long shot. Overall the film suffers from poor production values (the sets looked tacky), a lustreless screenplay, and uninteresting, perpetually grimacing characters. I got terribly bored, waiting for them to shut up and get on with it. And I got tired of watching the actors ham it up, and spew out dialogues that just brimmed with stupidity and a lack of imagination.

Quite disappointing.

Posted in 2009, bollywood, drama, rating-PG | 2 Comments

Review : Rachel getting married

Moving film. Stars the beautiful Anne Hathaway, and an outstanding cast. Reviewed on my other blog, here.

Posted in english, hollywood, recommended | Comments Off on Review : Rachel getting married

Review : Hulla

hullaRating : Above average (3.8/5)
Genre : Drama /Comedy
Year : 2008
Running time : 1 hours 50 minutes
Director : Jaideep Verma
Cast : Sushant Singh, Rajat Kapoor, Vrajesh Hirjee, Kartikadevi Rane, Mandeep Mazumdaar, Chandrachood Karnik,
Kid rating : PG

HULLA : SIMPLE PLOT AND SUBTLE HUMOR = GOOD FILM


Although Hindi cinema has come a long way from the usual boy-meets-girl routine, there are still few films made on small subjects. Hulla is one such film, quite a pioneer really, and it’s subject ? Noise. The noise at night. To put it precisely, the noise of the night watchman whistling. The entire film revolves around this noise, this “hulla” which keeps our hero awake and un-rested at night, and the effect this has on his life.

Sushant Singh plays Raj Puri, your average yuppie, married to pretty lady Abha (Kartika), both working and recently having bought a new flat in a housing society. Raj is a stock-broker, and busy and stressed out during the day. However when he returns tired to his apartment in the evening he finds no rest, because of the watchman’s whistles. This whistling apparently doesn’t bother anyone else in the building. Initially Raj tries peaceful methods like bribing the watchman (Chandrachur Karnik) to get him to not whistle as often, or to whistle far away his flat. However the watchman is answerable to the building society’s secretary Janardhan (Rajat Kapoor), who along with other occupants of the building thinks that Raj is making a mountain out of a molehill.

Raj finally gets desperate for some peace, and gets aggressive, calling in the police, much to his wife’s embarrassment. He gets irritable, paranoid and does badly at work. His comfortably happy life is now going to pieces . . .

I like the film conceptually – the idea is quite novel for a Hindi film, especially when desi audiences seem to only want films with pelvis-crunching item numbers. Anything remotely requiring brain-power and people can’t get their “entertainment”. This film comes in the “Bheja Fry” genre, if you can call “Bheja Fry” a genre – the kind of film which is based upon human quirks and fetishes and the effects those quirks and fetishes have on the rest of us mere mortals.

Jaideep Verma directs this film with a reasonably firm hand. In a film which is based on a very small happening, getting the details right is of the essence. Verma works hard to give us the 360 degree view – we get little insights into the character’s lives. We see Raj and Abha and their problems, Raj’s prejudiced in-laws and his demanding boss. And we also see Janardhan and his carping wife in their one-room apartment, and his ailing business. We are also introduced to the pitiful figure of the watchman, a stooped old man, with bad knees and failing eyesight, kow-towing to Janardhan for fear of losing his one source of income. Everyone, it seems, has their own compulsions, and you can’t help sympathizing with them.

The cast of characters in this film is impressive. Sushant Singh is an actor who’s shown his mettle before (Sehar), and while in this film he departs from his usual “villain” roles to play a tragic-comic character, he does quite well, save for a few over-done scenes. Rajat Kapoor is another very fine actor, and he too plays something other than his usual, suave self – Janardhan, a middle-class, un-gentrified, grey-haired babu. Kartika Rane as Abha is quite effective, as is Vrajesh Hirjee playing Raj’s colleague and confidant at work. And the actress who played Janardhan’s wife (I think it was Mazumdar) was magnificent.

The film is not without it’s problems however – it drags and gets repetitive. I wish that it had more scenes to give Raj’s character depth, and moved at a faster pace. But that said, it’s still a nicely nuanced piece of work, a decent film with a simple plot and subtle humor. Well worth a watch.

For the parents, this is an almost kid-safe film, except for one intimate, love-making scene, which earns it a PG rating.

Posted in 2008, bollywood, drama, family-friendly, humor, rating-PG, recommended | 1 Comment

Review : Fashion

fashion
Rating : Above average (3.8/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2008
Running time : 2 hours 40 minutes
Director : Madhur Bhandarkar
Cast : Priyanka Chopra, Raj Babbar, Mugdha Godse, Kangana Ranaut, Harsh Chhaya, Samir Soni, Kitu Gidwani, Arbaaz Khan, Ashwin Mushran, Chitrashi Rawat, Arjun Bawa
Kid rating : PG-13

FASHION : CLICHED BUT INERESTING

This film is quite a surprise, in that it features Priyanka Chopra, in a meaty, acting-oriented role. So far Priyanka has acted in films which pretty much ask 2 things of her : look pretty, and look dumb (i.e.; leave the thinking to the macho hero). She has THAT act down pat, so I was much surprised to see that she did quite well in this film too.

Fashion is your regular Bhandarkar expose, this time of the fashion world, the models, and the lifestyle of the ramp-walking glitterati. It chronicles the ambition of small-town girl Meghana Mathur. Not that Chandigarh is a small-town really, but apparently it’s value system is. So Meghana faces the standard opposition from the parents, or rather her father (Raj Babbar) when she wants to become a model. Her mother, played by Kiran Joneja is shown as being more supportive.

Anyway, Meghana refuses to listen to dear old Dad and hotfoots it to Mumbai, where the parental connections have ensured her a residence with some family friends. Meghana is ambitious and holds onto her dream with tenacity. Along the way she makes friends (a struggling male model) and enemies (super-model Shonali played by Kangana). Success comes, but at a price, and when Meghana realises that she’s hit rock-bottom and burnt her bridges there is almost no one left to turn to . . .

Priyanka is the poster-girl for glamor, so it is quite fitting that she play the lead. Kangana Ranaut, very model-like too, appears as model Shonali, who’s too entrenched in her drug-prone habits, to ever reclain the top spot in the modelling world again. She does good, as she always seems to in such manic-depressive roles. Mugdha Godse who plays Janet Sequiera, Meghana’s street-smart, model friend who didn’t quite make it, plays her part quite realistically. After many years, we see Kitu Gidwani in a short role as smart, sleek Anisha – the owner of a fashion agency. And there is also Arbaz Khan, the king of the fashion of the world, who takes Meghana under his wing.

Everyone is quite gay in this film, and I mean that literally. From Rohit, the assistant designer who helps Meghana take her first baby steps in the world of fashion, to Rahul Arora, the big-time fashion designer who concocts a marriage of convenience to keep nosy society at bay, the men of the fashion industry are quite queer (straight men have no creativity, huh ?). The women are hard-nosed, it’s a dog-eat-dog world, you’re up one day and down the next. The film is peppered with cliches – there are the drugs, the easy lapses of morality, and the air-kissing. Even so Bhandarkar manages to tell the story well, and without overtly trying to shock or sensationalize – something which a less talented director might easily have done.

This is a good film – it’s not spectacular. Any by that I mean that while it does keep you interested in the happenings of the film, you don’t feel very much for the main protagonist, Meghana. And that is partly due to the fact that Meghana’s character does not have adequate depth – yes, she is believable enough in her fresh-from-Punjab bangs, and her salwar-kameezed portfolio, but could have been better sketched. A finer actresss might have gone the extra mile, but Priyanka, although doing a commendable job, has as yet to hone her skills.

Please note that the subject matter is on the sad (if not depressive) side, and does not lend itself to being the Friday night entertainer. If you’re in a sombre mood, and ready for a thoughtful watch, this will probably interest you.

Films like this : If you liked this film you will also probably like
– Page 3
– Traffic Signal

Posted in 2008, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13, recommended | 1 Comment

Review : Ugly aur pagli

Rating : Poor(2/5)
Genre : Romantic Comedy
Year : 2008
Running time : 2 hrs
Director : Sachin Khot
Cast : Mallika Sherawat, Ranvir Shourey, Bharati Achrekar, Zeenat Aman, Payal Rohtagi

UGLY AUR PAGLI : VERY, VERY UGLY !

This film is surreal. And not in a good way. I accept that in this world, people behave in different ways, have different modes of reasoning/thinking and at times actions can be unfathomable – i.e.; is this person really nutty, or am I just not getting the drift ? Which is all fine and good – to each his/her own. However, if you actually are planning to make a movie featuring the above unfathomable actions, I have one word for you – don’t.

Watching this film, I had to ponder about whether it had, you know, like a deeper meaning. After 2 hours, I thought not. It tried to make believe that love is preceeded by pain – physical pain that is, which includes lots of slapping (by an almost stranger). Also that people who ill-treat you, really, really love you, you know, somewhere deep down underneath (although it’s so dark in there, who can really tell ?).

Pseudo-arty-sharty film, anyone ?

Touted as a kooky, romantic comedy in the teasers, U and P isn’t really one. It does have the whole twisted-love-in-anguish thing going on though. Kabir (Shourie) is an engineering student, who hasn’t passed his engineering exams in many years, but still struggles on. He meets beautiful Kuhu (Mallika), who’s then in a pretty sozzled state. No matter, the knight in shining armor promptly rescues her. Again and again. And all he ever gets in return in bad attitude. And so it goes . . . for a very long time indeed.

The film revolved around this theme of the doormat Kabir being trod upon by insensitive Kuhu again and again, until it was very hard to take. Sure, there are sad stories, but I didn’t sign up for one, looking at the trailer.

I can see what this film was trying to do, ie; develop into a delicate, ethereal vision of a film which would have us all wiping away tears of gentle understanding, and oohing and aahing at the subtle intricacies of love. Maybe “My Sassy Girl”, the Korean movie upon which U & P is based, is such a film (I haven’t seen it). U and P definitely isn’t. So what’s missing ? Here’s a list :

1. Romance : You thought romance was some delicate flower blooming in a hitherto untouched human heart ? Poor sod, you ! It’s not. As per this director, it’s someone trying to make a guy wear a woman’s shoes (literally) and having him drive a seat-less bicycle .

2. Chemistry between the lead pair : Mallika and Shorey come together like chalk and cheese. Leave alone as a romantic couple these two should not even be cast in the same film.

3. Comedy : Nyet, nada !

4. Character development : Mallika’s character Kuhu was one-dimensional. Yes, the character was obnoxious and over-bearing. Yes, we do have a reason given to explain away her abusive ways, but minus all the supporting infrastructure, this role falls flat. Another film, Everybody says I’m fine had the heroine exhibiting similarly surreal behavior, but she had a pretty believable reason. Shorey is a fine actor, so I’ve got to blame it on the screenplay for botching up the job so bad.

And here’s something which almost made the above list : the screenplay. There is indeed a screenplay – ie; there is dialogue and action. However it misses out on major ingredients like redeeming qualities in protagonists, and developing points of interest. A romance hinges around two likeable characters, and the ability to get the audience so interested in them, that they are rooting on the two bcoming a twosome. Kuhu and Kabir are pretty unlikeable, Kuhu is downright nasty, whereas Kabir is too door-matty for his own good. One hopes that Kabir gets as far as possible from Kuhu as possible, not the other way around. In other words, I care 2 hoots about these people – therefore blissful love ? Not happening, atleast in this movie.

And the songs were something else – loud and outlandish, with very few contextual moorings. If you think of the film as this fragile, blooming bud (which it was not – I can’t seem to get away from the floral analogy), the songs were the nasty little boy who stomped all over it. What gives ?

One tries to not be too mean while dissing a film, but folks, here’s fair warning – this is a ghastly, ghastly film. Keep away.

Posted in 2008, bollywood, drama, rating-PG, romance | 1 Comment

Review : Ramchand Pakistani

Rating : Above Average (3.8/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2008
Running time : 1 hour 45 minutes
Director : Mehreen Jabbar
Cast : Nandita Das, Syed Fazal Hussein, Rashid Faroqi, Maria Wasti
Kid rating : PG 13

RAMCHAND PAKISTANI : HEART-WRENCHING DRAMA !

Ramchand Pakistani is about a lost little boy. The boy is a Dalit Hindu, of a tribe in the Thar desert of Pakistan. Ramchand, for that’s his name, is angry at his mother Champa (Das), and in a fit of pique, such as the very young have, walks away from his village Bhimra, and across the India-Pakistan border. There he, and his father Shankar (Rashid Farooqui), who comes after him, are captured by the Indian border patrol and jailed. Their fellow detainees are mostly people who like them, have walked unwittingly across the border (what is it but large white rocks placed at regular distances ?) and have remained incarcerated for many years, some losing their minds and others losing hope. Amid despair, red tape and the bureaucracy of two nations almost at war, Ramchand and his father remain hopeful . . .

It is a simple story, detailing lives lived in waiting. While Ramchand and his father wait to be released, Champa waits for her son and husband to return home. They are all innocent people, swallowed and chewed up by the monster of suspicion. They are helpless, and at the mercy of the state. The state is personified by well-meaning, if straight-jacketed male prison wardens, and one female warden, who is made responsible for Ramchand’s education. She sort-of mothers the hapless child, although will not touch him because of his caste. Ramchand weathers his time in jail, among adults (he is the only child) mopping floors, learning to read, and somewhat indulged by fellow prisoners.

Syed Fazal Hussain plays the 7 year old Ramchand, with an innocence and naivete that strums the heartstrings. He is a mischievous little child who won’t go to the rudimentary village school, sasses his mother, and demands the full cup of chai that his father receives. Hussein puts in a finely nuanced performance, and pretty much carries the film. His mother’s role, essayed beautifully by Nandita Das, is of a rural woman, who waits for years for the return of her husband and son. Distraught as she is, she refuses to give up hope, even when everyone else (including her husband’s brother) does. Das, clad in colorful clothes and arm-lengths of bangles, masterfully underplays her character.

Farooqi is Shankar, a poor farmer, living in poverty. He is also the father caught in a no-win situation, watching his life wasting away amid the narrow confines of a prison cell. He is anguished, sorrowful, and at times angry, at the drone-like officials, who won’t let them return home, and at his son, who started it all. Maria Wasti, who looks a little like Sameera Reddy, plays the prison warden, and does well.

Mehreen Jabbar does an adequate job of direction. The storyline is fairly straight-forward, and emotion is built up by delving into details of village life, prison life, and the travails of both. Whereas the lonely Champa cleans, cooks, and works in the fields and refuses to move from the village when other villagers move in search of work, Ramchand pines for his mother, and cannot understand why the prison guards won’t let him go home. He also learns many new things in the prison. There is some education, yes, but there is also a worldliness, an introduction to urban life (such as it is within the confines of the jail).

This is not a fast-paced film, and the characters are built up carefully. We feel for the protagonists because they are the common man, poor and desperate, wanting only to be free, but kept captive for crimes they haven’t committed. It is the case of the little man against the bloated, bureaucratic state, a state which keeps innocent people hostage because of mere suspicion.

The characters are also very “human”, in the sense that they have their own little quirks. The female prison warden, is partial to Sridevi films, which she lets Ramchand watch, and he then, just stepping into adolescence, develops a crush on her (the warden). Ramchand’s mother, Champa, alone, although living with her brother-in-law’s family, develops feelings for a local merchant. Her hopes, however, are thwarted by class and caste barriers. She is never allowed to forget her presumed-dead husband, as depicted in a scene where she buys herself new clothes, but is reprimanded by her brother-in-law, “for dressing up like it was Diwali”.

The film does not take sides, it is not preachy – it simply tells a tale, and let’s you judge. There are no rants about one country being better than the other, and there is no pointing of fingers, or shifting of blame, which lets us, the viewers focus on the human story it tells. It’s a poignant tale, and a moving film (I wept buckets).

Ramchand Pakistani is not your average Friday-night entertainer – it is infact a sad film, the way films are when they speak of anguish and suffering. It is based on a true story, and while it is only Ramchand and his father that we care about in this film, it is well worth noting that there are many such “prisoners” rotting away their lives in the jails of India and Pakistan. For getting out the message on them, and their pitiful condition, this film is to be commended.

Posted in 2008, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13, recommended | 4 Comments

Review : Amu

Rating : Average (3.4/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2005
Running time : 2 hrs and 22 minutes
Director : Shonali Bose
Cast : Konkona Sen Sharma, Brinda Karat, Subhasini Ali, Ankur Khanna

AMU : IMPORTANT SUBJECT BUT FILM FALTERS

I’m watching Amu in 2008, while it was actually made in 2005, and released for the festival circuit in 2007, because the DVD version was made available only recently. The film was controversial because it pointed fingers at the government’s role in the anti-Sikh riots of 1984. It’s been 24 years since, and almost no justice has been meted out.

It is to be noted that the director Shonali Bose, a UCLa film graduate, and niece of Ms. Karat, also wrote and produced this film, and even helped distribute it. Ms. Bose who was 19 when the carnage took place later volunteered in relief camps, where she heard harrowing tales of torture and killings. Understandably making the film was hard, because the government took umbrage and wanted to censor it.

Amu’s main focus is the 1984 riot, and the subject is indirectly introduced through the story of American UCLA graduate Kaju Roy who is in India vacationing with her very Bengali “bhadralok” family. Amu has been told that she is adopted and her biologiacal family was wiped out due to malaria. However, in India, she finds that that story (of her bilogical family) is shaky and learns of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots which orphaned many kids. She was adopted close to that time.

Investigating further with the help of Kabir, a bourgeoisie son of a rich, well-connected father, and pressing for clarification from her mother, Amu finally discovers the terrible truth.

I was a kid when these riots happened, in a city far removed from Delhi, so my memories of the anti-Sikh atrocities are dim. However, it is very clear that this is an important film, with an important tale to tell. The Indian nation seems to forget it’s mistakes and thus they reoccur; recall Godhra.

Konkona Sen Sharma plays Kaju very effectively, curious, naive, and trying to find her “roots”. Brinda Karat plays her adoptive mother Keya, and besides the fact that she is not a very good actress, she is also off-putting because she is an active Communist politician, notably most recently involved in the Communist Left pulling support from the Indian government on it’s decision to go ahead with the US nuclear deal. The third major character is Kabir, played by lanky Ankur Khanna, and he does fairly well. Also the scenes between Amu’s grandmother and cousin are executed very realistically.

Apart from the subject matter, this was not an exceptional film. The director does not hold the reins very tightly, and the screenplay isn’t very polished. It is a coherent film – that is we do get a sense of Amu’s terrible history, but it does lack dramatic impact. While Amu plods along in a fairly regular fashion, it fails to incite passion or feeling, on the protagonist’s behalf. The film does not feature intense, personal moments, and while Amu is facing a harsh truth, she is safe and sound and now priviliged. Thus my sympathy was more for the people who suffered through this and haven’t gotten justice yet, rather than Amu herself.

The 1984 riots were indeed gruesome, and it seems terrible to want “personal” moments to feel for a film (why can we not be automatically passionately outraged by the mere mention of such atrocities ?), but it is what it is. A mediocre film with a very important message.

Posted in 2008, bollywood, drama, rating-PG, social issues, watchable | 2 Comments

Review : Rock On

Rock On Movie Review

Rating : ⭐️⭐️⭐️ 1/2
Genre : Drama
Year : 2008
Running time : 2 hours 15 minutes
Director : Abhishek Kapoor
Cast : Farhan Akhtar, Arjun Rampal, Luke Kenny, Purab Kohli, Prachi Desai, Sahana Goswami
Kid rating : PG



Ever since “Dil Chahta hai” hit screens, I’ve thought of Farhan Akhtar as a very talented guy. His Lakshya was very good too, so I’d expected “Rock on” to show just the same high level of quality. Unfortunately it doesn’t live up it’s promise; it’s not bad yeah, but it’s not that great either.

“Rock on” is also about friendship, it’s weakening and strengthening, about the changes in life and about growing up. Four friends rocking together in college hope to get a record label to sign them up, but break up as differences arise – that’s the basic premise.

It could have given DCH some competiition had it had more substance. Not so much meat, you know ? As it was, it seemd to be rather thinly stretched over a few scattered events. Plus it failed in the “oomph” department. I mean I like Farhan and all, but he is not an Aamir or a Hrithik. The only star among those 4 was Rampal, and he didn’t shine brightly enough (he doesn’t ever but that’s another story). It’s probably wearing all those hats that did it – Farhan is an excellent director, he sings fairly well, but acting ? Probably not for him. Not that he doesn’t act well, but would you rather watch Farhan as a rocker or Hrithik ?

Now DCH and Lakshya, both did an excellent job of characterization; all those people in those movies felt real, and spoke like actual people. “Rock on” tried hard, I think, in this aspect, but the characters were a bit stilted. Take Aditya’s (Farhan’s) wife Sakshi (played by Prachi Desai) – pretty one-dimensional, smiling, sweet, not a nasty bone to her, hmm ? Or Debbie, Joe’s (Rampal) wife, who’s more real – she quit her fashion designing dreams for Joe, appears very narrowly shrewish. She unrealistically buckles down when Joe puts his music above all else, I’d pretty much expected her to leave him at that point, but she in a very filmi way, shoulders the burden and let’s him play music.

The film’s protagnists have problems, yes – like the rest of us. However they also have an overarching goal. What is not very easy to connect to is the need for them to fulfill that goal – that need for them to play music. We know it’s a missing part of their lives, but it lacks feeling, that deep-down gut-wrenching, visceral laying-out of emotion that can transport a film from being a regular old film on music and friendship to being extraordinary.

I must say though that I quite liked the sound-track. The 2 slow numbers, “Phir dekhiye” and “Yeh tumhari meri baatein” are beautiful ballads, while “Tum ho to” is almost there. “Socha hai” was interesting as is “Pichle saat dinon mein”. However music alone does not a movie make, so although this film is watchable, I’m not exactly recommending it.

Technorati tag :

Posted in 2008, All Netflix, bollywood, drama, Hindi movies on Netflix, rating-PG, recommended | 6 Comments