Review : Dor

Rating : Good (4/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2006
Director : Nagesh Kukunoor
Cast : Ayesha Takia, Gul Panag, Girish Karnad, Shreyas Talpade

DOR : Shades of feminism
 

This film comes from the Kukunoor-ian stable, most famous for low-budget hits like “Hyderabad Blues”, and most recently “Iqbal”. The film is woman-oriented in that it portrays the plight of young widows in modern day rural India, and explores ways of empowering them (well just one of them here, but still). The story unfolds at a slow pace, peppered with nice, simple but touching vignettes.

Zeenat (Gul) is an independent young Himachali woman married to Amir, who’s working in Saudi Arabia. Mira (Takia) is a young Rajput-ian bride, living in her in-laws orthodox home as her husband Shankar earns a living in Saudi Arabia also. Shankar and Amir are apparently friends in Saudi Arabia, but tragedy strikes as Shanker is accidentally killed by Amir. While Meera is buried under sorrow and the weight of traditional customs which deprive a widow of her ornaments, good food or any such luxuries, Zeenat must find a way of rescuing Amir from the death penalty imposed on him. The only way it seems is to get a signed pardon (maafi-naama) from Shanker’s widow. For that Zeenat sets out for Rajasthan, armed only with a photo, to search out Shanker’s widow and obtain from her, her only hope for Amir’s life . . .

I was much impressed by the local scenery of Rajasthan as well as Himachal, as shown in the film. Breath-takingly beautiful. The blue houses were a nice eye-popping color, and the artwork outside Rajasthani homes was gorgeous. The story is interesting, although it does have parts which seems theatrical and made-for-reel-life. Direction is good, and Kukunoor paces his story well, keeping one interested. The characters are well sketched and believable. The dialogues reflect much of the local flavor, and at times discuss feminism and the plight of women. There is only one song (a beautiful retake on the old “Kesariya balam”), which plays back in refrains.

While Ayesha Takia does a surprisingly good job as Meera – the coy smile, the innocence, and later the anger and sorrow are convincing, Panag appears emotionless by comparison. This might be the director’s doing in wanting to make her appear calm and collected in the most stressful situations, however IMO, some feeling is necessary to gain viewer sympathy. Veteran actor Karnad appears as Mira’s patriarchal father-in-law and is superb; if only we had more actors like him. Shreyas Talpade as good-hearted Bahrupiya, is good, effortless in his buffoonery (all that mimicry suits him no end), and believable in serious parts. Actors playing minor roles, such as Amir’s or Shanker’s are very good too.

This is a nice film, and a welcome break from all the other crap objectifying women. If you want a good, clean film strong on content, this one’s for you.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, drama, outstanding, recommended | 10 Comments

Review : Bas Ek Pal

[amazon_link id=”B004S9KHIY” target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Bas Ek Pal (2006) (Hindi Film / Bollywood Movie / Indian Cinema DVD)[/amazon_link]Rating : Above average (3.5/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2006
Running time : 3 hours
Director : Onir
Cast : Juhi Chawla, Jimmy Shergill, Sanjay Suri, Urmila
Matondkar, Rehaan Engineer

 

Bas ek Pal : One convoluted story

This film is a “Closer” of sorts – a love story for nincompoops. You know the type – he loves her but she doesn’t love him and she loves him but he is jealous, blah, blah, blah. A splurge of emotions; I am confused as I am sure the characters are too. From the songs which regularly play on MTV Desi I had expected am “arty”, thoughtful film, kind of like “My brother Nikhil”. Thoughtful it is; it’s just too much thought. It seems like Onir has tried to mesh many stories into one, and is unable to display completely the angst of any one character.

OK, so there’s Nikhil (Suri) an NRI, newly returned to India. He meets old friend Rahul (Shergill), and Rahul’s friend Steve (Engineer). Nikhil’s a Casanova of sorts, Rahul’s a nice guy and Steve’s a wife-beater. His wife Ira (Juhi), is an independent woman, who thinks of leaving him but never does. Rahul meets Anamika (Urmila) at a nightclub, and is enamored by her. However in another meeting at the club there is a scuffle over her, and Nikhil accidentally shoots Rahul. So, urban boy Nikhil lands in jail, and serves his time with just Anamika’s memory to console him. When he gets out on bail 3 years later, his one aim is to attain her . . .

The story tries too hard to be interesting – a simpler story would have been easier to digest. Some of the scenes are just absurd, like the one at the end where Ira is going around the city in pouring rain at night, telling everyone she’s leaving. One’d think that with Bombay’s history of flooding she’d stay home and use the phone.

The characters aren’t very well sketched. Nikhil who seems like a reasonable guy, has shades of the psychotic stalker, which don’t fit very well. Ira finally gets the strength to leave Steve, but how she gets here is unclear. She’s the kind of woman who causes harm by just being conscientious and forthright – such a pity. Anamika’s character is that of a woman who knows not her own mind, torn between love (?) and guilt/duty. And it’s not very well portrayed; Urmila in this film as in some of the previous ones, can’t project her character, and appears “off” undecided on whether she should be smiling or crying in that scene. The sheen of “Pinjar” in which she was superb, is now wearing off.

Rahul’s character is the true-nice-guy. However later in the film, Rahul has pangs of jealousy and actually tries to cause trouble, kinda unbelievable because we don’t really see the anger which would lead to that desperate step. If he’d have shouted and ranted a bit more, he would have been more believable. I know that Shergill could have done justice to Rahul’s character, so I blame the director and the twisted script for the lapse. Steve’s character seemed the most consistent, and the one I most believed.

The music of the film is beautiful though, and almost all the tracks are melodious, humm-able or just plain haunting, like the “Tere bin” number. This film is just about OK, notice I’m not whooping in my seat or anything. So, although I can’t really applaud the film for anything except the music, I’ve got to say that despite the convoluted story, inept scripting and blurred characters, this movie is loads better than the crap out there.

Posted in 2006, bollywood | Comments Off on Review : Bas Ek Pal

Review : Khosla ka ghosla

Rating : Very good (4.2/5)
Genre : Comedy / Drama
Year : 2006
Running time : 2 hours 10 minutes
Director : Dibakar Banerjee
Cast : Anupam Kher, Kiran Joneja, Parvin Dabbas, Boman Irani, Ranvir Shourie, Tara Sharma, Navin Nischol, Vinay Pathak

Khosla ka ghosla : A treat to watch !


Dibakar Banerjee directs his first film like a pro. It doesn’t hurt to have accomplished actors like Kher and Irani in it either. A tight narrative and good screenplay round off the perfect 10. Although this is more of a drama than a comedy (which is what I was expecting), it does lace a serious subject with humor.

Kamal Kishore Khosla (Kher) is the typical mild-mannered, service-class patriarch, with 2 sons and a daughter. While his eldest Bunty (Shourie) has turned into a non-working wastrel, his younger son Cherry (Dabbas) is a computer engineer secretly planning on moving to the US. Khosla, who’s about to retire, dreams of making a bigger home, and for this buys a plot from property dealer Vijayender. However when he arrives for the bhoomi-pujan with family in tow, he finds that his land has been encroached upon by notorious land-grabber Kishen Khurana (Irani), who’s built a wall around the plot, and placed goons to ward off the Khoslas.

When Khosla requests the land back, he is told to pay up. Refusal, and attempts to get help from the police, NGO’s , politicians, and hired goons, land him in jail at powerful Khurana’s instigation. Dis-illusioned, Khosla resigns himself to the loss of his life’s savings, which he’s sunk into the purchase of the plot. There seems no way to win this un-just war . . .

Kher as Khosla is superb as always; you expect nothing less from him. However, the real scene stealer is Boman Irani who delivers a great performance playing a nouveau-rich, corrupt, land-shark. Wearing typical, “shiny” clothing, a thick gold chain, and slicked-back hair, Irani exudes kamina-pan (there’s no other word for it). Then there is Ranvir Shourie (of The Great Indian Comedy Show), who is the quintessential Delhi boy, sponging off his Dad, and spitting out local Delhi-speak like “shagird”, “bhuliyo mat”. Dabbas, best known for “Monsoon Wedding” – he was also in “Kuch Meetha Ho Jaye”, underplays his character wonder-fully, a studious go-by-the-books kind of guy, wishing to distance himself from middle-class sentimentality. Tara Sharma (of “Page 3” fame) as Megha, Cherry’s friend who-wishes-to-be-more, does good, even with her raspy voice. Vinay Pathak (also of “The Great Indian Comedy Show” fame – he also appeared in “Water”) as the street-smart visa-handler Iqbal Asif, who’s helping Cherry with America-bound plans is fantastic, even in a minor role. The rest of the cast with smaller roles, are very good too.

KKG stands tall on it’s 3 legs, a strong script, great screenplay, and an out-standing cast. Background music is used effectively in the film, although there are no real “songs” in the film, save one – a rollicking Punjabi number. The story is a take-off on many true happenings, since I’ve heard of many cases of land-grabbing, and tenants usurping rented property in the context of Delhi’s out-dated land-laws and ridiculous justice system. And the tug at the heart is because Khosla so eloquently represents the common, middle-class man, so mindful of right and wrong, yet helpless in the face of a corrupt system, to regain what is rightfully his.

The verdict : a must-watch.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, comedy, drama, family-friendly, outstanding, recommended | 10 Comments

Review : Don

Rating : Above average (3.85/5)
Genre : Thriller
Year : 2006
Running time : 2 hr and 59 minutes
Director : Farhan Akhtar
Cast : Shahrukh Khan, Priyanka Chopra, Boman Irani, Isha Koppikar, Om Puri, Arjun Rampal, Kareena Kapoor

Don (2006) : Good but not scintillating
 

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. I so agree. Thus you’ll understand, that when I went to see Don, it was with in-built prejudice. I was convinced that Akhtar was making a mistake attempting the remake of a classic. How do you make a great film’s remake even better ? You don’t. At best, you could improve on it minutely, and then, let’s face it, who’d notice ? At worst, you could crash and burn – and the whole world would know.

And while I can’t say that Akhtar has achieved the impossible, I must say that he’s tried. The film started off visibly slow. The first few scenes did nothing more than follow in chronological order – Don did this and did that etc. Quite boring. The first half followed in the original’s foot-steps, with SRK attempting an emulation of Amitabh’s Don, and the film seemingly content to wallow in pre-delivered and well-remembered punch-lines. And while the movie pre-interval clearly smacks of adulation for the original, in the second half, Akhtar comes into his own, putting a new, cerebral spin on an old tale.

Doubtless, you’ll remember the story scene for scene. Still, here’s the gist : Don – dashing kingpin of the underworld, wreaks havoc. DCP D’Silva hot on trail. Don dies unexpectedly. Enter Vijay – a Don look-alike, rural bumpkin, tutored by D’Silva to infiltrate Don’s gang by impersonating him. That done, D’Silva dies. Don, aka Vijay, pursued by police who think him Don, and gang-members who know he’s not, now in very, very hot soup.

Just reiterating the story makes me tingly. The drama, the promise of a juicy tale, the immense opportunity of a thriller ! There are 2 ways to look at this film, one by making the obvious comparison, and the second to judge it stand-alone, by itself. The first way, “Don 2006” comes out the loser. The reason : Shahrukh is Shahrukh, and while I do like the guy, he is no Amitabh. It makes you realize just how much Bachhan was responsible for the original’s magic. Also, the 1978 Don was a tight, simple script held together by cinematic muscle and Amitabh’s skin. It moved, and it moved fast. And it was un-complicated. Here’s the hero, here’s the villain – a couple of hours later, the good guy wins and everyone goes home happy. The new Don seems to revel less in it’s very Bollywood-ian formula, and tries a tad too hard. It is too conscious of itself. While stylized and “brainier“, and presenting to us a new improved, cutting edge Don it forgets to imbue him with anything more substantial than frivolous personality and zany neck-ties.

However, I find much to applaud when I look at Don 2006 stand-alone. The film has style. It takes a while to get the pace up, but when it does, it revs up and takes off. Most importantly, it diverges from the known rut, to travel a slightly different, original path. The characters in the film, although bearing the same names as the original, are a newer, cooler, funkier version. They jetset around the world, displaying their snazzy outfits and (then ?) trendy Moto Razrs. The film has a modern feel to it, and the characters translate accordingly. Plus actors, like Priyanka Chopra (looking gorgeous and very Zeenat-esque with those signature neck-scarves) and Arjun Rampal, who’m I’d been leery off, do better than expected. The music borrows heavily from the original songs, but the newer interpretations are picturized well. The fight sequences, of which there are many, are done beautifully. It’s not the usual dhishum-dhishum anymore; these are well-crafted, sinuous, lethal-looking moves, enacted by fighting-fit actors.

As expected, there are problems also. To me, the film did not flow as engrossing films should. Plus the entire concept seemed dated, like the director was forcing a 70’s film to come of age. Unfortunately, the wrinkles show; a square 1978-ish peg in a round 2006-ish hole. Acting wise, SRK’s stylized rendition of “the Don” didn’t feel like the real thing – it looked put-on. He does better in the second half of the film, when enacting the “new” bits. Also Shahrukh as country bumpkin was hard to swallow since he exudes an urban yuppie-ness that‘s hard to miss. When Amitabh did the role, I believed it all – the anger, the callousness, the simplistic naivete. No questions asked. With SRK, even though he does leave his mark (like the well-done “Khaike Paan” number) I have to think too hard. Boman Irani as DCP D’Silva does the job adequately, although he seems to oscillate quite a bit, between being hellishly cold, and passionately furious. Isha Koppikar as Anita looked rather faded and washed out (did the clothes just not suit her or has she fattened up – I couldn‘t tell), and Kareena as Kamini appeared much too naive. Not a patch on our Helen.

I did notice that the cast at times reverted to vintage, but still stylish, 70’s clothing. The women display ample cleavage and leg, and look good doing it. Priyanka appears in a one piece swim-suit which is almost a bikini, and Kareena in the “Yeh mera dil” number worries not as the hem of her dress moves higher and higher. Still, what’s with SRK’s neckties ? Ties worn under the shirt do not make you look cool; they make you look like you have ADD.

My reaction to the film, thus, is mixed. I am un-excited about trudging in some-one’s jaded footsteps just because. Hence while I tolerate the first half, it is the second, post-interval half which gets my vote. It is clear that Farhan, like the rest of us, suffers from a big time Don hangover. However, he does manage to breathe into it some of his own directorial magic; original, new-fangled shards of brilliance which translate into unexpected twists in a worn story. The film is definitely worth a dekho; just don’t go in expecting too much. You might not get it.

Update : The edited version of this review appears on Rediff here

Posted in 2006, action, bollywood, rating-PG, thriller, watchable | 5 Comments

Review : Pyar ke side effects

Movie Review Pyaar Ke Side Effects

Rating : ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
Genre : Romance
Year : 2006
Running time : 2 hrs and 11 minutes
Director : Saket Chaudhary
Cast : Rahul Bose, Mallika Sherawat, Jas Arora, Suchithra Pillai, Tarana Raja, Ranvir Shourie, Aamir Bashir

PYAR KE SIDE EFFECTS : A funny romantic yarn

A nice, differently told tale. Attempts to be arty-sharty with the asides and the characters speaking to the audience. And does it well too. Really what you would not expect of a Mallika Sherawat film. It’s not brash, loud-mouthy or showing excessive cleavage. It’s soft, sweet, with an under-lying love theme. Yes, there are scenes which I would call flights of fancy, but then all is fair in love and war, no?

What it’s about, is avoiding marriage. The topic seems like it’s transposed straight from Hollywood; I know India’s changing and whatnot, but are live-in couples yet the norm ? Live-in couples who shake in their boots thinking of impending marriage ? For Sid Bose (Rahul Bose) atleast, that’s true. For his girl-friend Trisha (Mallika), who’s proposed to him, it’s either the marriage mandap, or the highway. Sid takes the highway. And regrets it. Realizes he loves Trisha more than he thinks. And he is getting ready to woo her again, but finds that Trisha’s ex-suitor Vivek (Arora) is already ahead in the race.

The characters are interesting and quirky; the hero Sid is a DJ, and has a room-mate Nanoo (the fantastic Ranvir Shourie) who’s averse to bathing. Sid also has a strong-willed sister Shalini (Tarana Raja) who’s pregnant and her husband Kapil (Aamir Baashir) is not yet ready to be a father. The men (Sid, Kapil and Nanoo) bond by whining about life in general and not wanting to marry/ to be parents/ able to get laid respectively.

The heroine Trisha is unconventional – she’s taller than her boyfriend and makes more money than him. Plus she doesn’t adhere to the constraints of being a nice Punjabi “kudi” and has a habit of running away from her marriage ceremonies. Vivek Chaddha (Arora) is the hunk Trisha ran away from at the marriage mandap, but he’s still nuts about her. Very successful, the guy is multi-talented and annoyingly nice (shades of Owen Wilson in “Meet the parents”). Trisha’s Dad is sketched off of Jack Byrnes character in “Meet the Parents”. Not ex-CIA but close.

This is a happy-go-lucky film, you know it’s going to be all right ; the director’s just making us jump through the hoops to stretch the film length a bit. The film, besides having a very urban story, breezes by you. And I mean that nicely. It’s funny without being slap-sticky or trying too hard. You don’t have to have a high IQ to understand it. And it’s pleasant – no icky villains, or bloody gore or unnecessary violence. It’s all in the head, the pondering, the musing, the soul-searching.

This movie is truly a multiplex movie. It’s very yuppie and urban – I mean who else actually has the luxury of debating marriage ? Plus it’s newly modern in it’s sensibilities – like say “live-in” and don’t gasp. It’s also a lot of fun, and worth hoots of laughter.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, drama, rating-PG, recommended, romance | 3 Comments

Review : Aap ki khatir

[amazon_link id=”B000LC55T8″ target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Aap Ki Khatir[/amazon_link]Rating : Poor (2.8/5)
Genre : Romantic Comedy
Year : 2006
Running time : 2 hrs and 8 minutes
Director : Dharmesh Darshan
Cast : Priyanka Chopra, Akshaye Khanna, Amisha Patel, Suniel Shetty, Anupam Kher, Lillette Dubey, Dino Morea

AAP KI KHATIR : Unfunny and uninteresting !

This film deserves one classification : junk. I saw this film by fast-forwarding the most uninteresting bits (which were many) but even a fast-forwarded 130 minutes of this film is too long. It’s a rip-off of the Hollywood “Wedding Date” and pretty much copies it without a thought. And it’s directed by Dharmesh Darshan – the one who did the abominable Bewafaa – so, yeah it’s worse than you expect.

First of all, my dears the acting is nothing to write home about. Darshan picks the choicest of non-actors : Chopra, Shetty and Patel. Khanna is OK, but that hairstyle really sinks him; what is with the delicate tendrils of hair framing his face ? Such a pity that neither of Vinod Khanna’s sons have inherited an ounce of his charisma. Then Darshan goes overboard on all his characters, making them caricature-like in their jovialty and accentuated emotions. Add to that Himesh Reshammiya’s songs which pop up every 10 minutes and you have a disastrous banshee of a film.

Anu (Chopra) is a UK-based Punjabi girl working and living in Bombay because of her unhappy break-up with Danny boy (Morea). Now, 3 years later she must head UK-wards to attend her step-sister Shirani’s (Patel) wedding. But still pining for Danny, she hires an escort Aman (Khanna)to act as her boy-friend to make Danny jealous. Punjabi kudi Shirani is marrying Gujju Kunal (Shetty). Both have very ethnically over-done parents – she has the stereotypical loud and over-bearing Punjabi parents and he’s saddled with the accented Gujju parivar. Of course Danny is at the wedding because he’s Kunal’s best friend. However he is well over Anu and has other fish to fry . . .

If this film had any redeeming qualities, I would tell you, I would. Honest. But it has none. The heroine is pretty but dumb. The hero is cute but has a bad hair-do. The actors who can act (Kher and Dubey) are given ridiculous roles and leave-you-numb lines. The rest of the cast are cringe-worthy. The screeplay and story are poor (even the ripping-off is done pathetically), the film lacks pace and it’s pretty un-funny.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, ecstatically stupid | 2 Comments

Review : Ahista Ahista


Rating : Above average (3.5/5)
Genre : Romance
Year : 2006
Director : Shivam Nair
Cast : Abhay Deol, Soha Ali Khan, Shayan Munshi

Ahista Ahista : Slow and steady doesn’t win the race !

Abhay Deol and a cute heroine – I thought we had another “Socha na tha”. Sadly not. Although this is just as cutesy and sweet, the end of this film is so anti-climactic, and basically against everything that I would see a film for, that I really cannot stomach this one. I mean, one sees a film for the larger than life messages they propagate – the ones of hope, happiness and redemption. If a film doesn’t fit that bill, you might as well not see it, no?

OK, that warning notwithstanding this film does have it’s good points. It’s simple, well told and pretty clean. Although it is true to it’s name, i.e.; it progresses pretty “Ahista Ahista”, it’s a well-developed love-story. Abhay Deol turns into a charmer oozing sincerity (even when mouthing choice cuss words), and Soha Ali Khan adds dignity to the role. The film has “Nukkad” like scenes where the hero consorts with a group of friends on a regular basis, giving it a nice, homely feel. The music is pleasant, with one really good song.

Ankush (Deol) is a professional witness at a Delhi marriage court. That’s how he earns his daily bread. There he meets simple, middle class girl Megha (Soha) who’s run away from her Nainital home, in the hopes of marrying boyfriend Dheeraj (Munshi). When Dheeraj doesn’t turn up, she is left stranded in the city without money or friends. Ankush helps her, and she manages to get a job in an old-age home. Ankush now has feelings for her, and Soha might love him too. However all Ankush’s hopes are dashed when 2 months later Dheeraj turns up looking for Megha . . .

Deol, Soha and the supporting cast do well. Munshi looks pretty playboy-ish and I can’t manage much sympathy for his character. Especially after the Jessica Lall thing. And he speaks Hindi pretty well. The direction is decent, and the characters adequately developed. The story does tend to wax unreal in parts, like when the old-age home honcho criticizes Megha for romantic involvement with Ankush. Like really, who has the time these days ? And it’s an old-age home, not a nunnery, right ?

All that said, IT IS a sweet film. I just wish the director had made the wait worthwhile.

Posted in 2006, bollywood | Comments Off on Review : Ahista Ahista

Review : Anthony kaun hai

akh


Rating : Above average (3.2/5)
Genre : Thriller
Year : 2006
Director : Raj Kaushal
Cast : Arshad Warsi, Sanjay Dutt, Minissha Lamba, Anusha Dandekar, Gulshan Grover, Ravi Baswani, Chetan Hansraj , Raghubir Yadav

ANTHONY KAUN HAI : A rather slow thriller

I had an inkling that this was one of those different films, but the one review that I read trashed it. However after seeing this film I don’t think it’s all bad. The big flaw is that it’s slow and can’t maintain pace, it being a who-dun-it and all. However the story is diifferent (inspired by Hollywood film “Who is Cletis Tout”) and the narration is unique. The acting is good – Arshad Warsi has a meaty chunk of it. This film is innovative, it strays from that well-trod path of Bollywood masala flicks, so yeah, I hand it an above average rating.

Champ or Champak Chaudhary (Warsi) is a small-time crook, dreaming of hitting the big-time by retrieving hidden diamonds. However, while going by a different name, he is caught by for-hire-killer Master Madan (Dutt). Madan threatens to kill him believing him to be Anthony Gonsalves. Champ has to convince Madan that he is not Gonsalves by relating his very unbelievable story. Does Madan believe him, or is it Adios Champak ?

The film relates Champak’s story in flashback. Anousha Dandekar makes a brief appearance in the film as Champ’s one-time girlfriend Rosa – a role of no consequence if you ask me; it has zero impact on the story. Raghubir Yadav plays a con-man, Champ meets in jail. Minisha Lamba plays Jiya, the girl Champ loves, and the one helping him retrieve those diamonds. Minisha does good, although with each film of hers, I am convinced more and more that she does not have what it takes to make it big-time in Bollywood. Dutt as Master Madan, looks suave in a suit and a Ferrari, is cold-blooded and revels in the part. Gulshan Grover is the detective on the trail of a murder, linking Gonsalves and Lucky Sharma (Hansraj) the actual villain. Warsi as Champ is as always, good. He is in form whether it is comedy, drama or just plain old masala fare; I wish he’d get better roles.

I am surprised to see this film come from Raj Kaushal the maker of such unmentionables as “Pyar mein kabhi kabhi” and “Shaadi ka laddoo”. In this film, he needs to tighten the direction; too much slack in a thriller puts the viewer to sleep. As it did in my case; I had to rewind the film after I woke up. Still, the rewind experience notwihstanding, I’d say give it a dekho – it’s on DVD now.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, drama, thriller | 1 Comment

Review : Lage raho Munnbhai

[amazon_link id=”B002PM9VOM” target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Lage Raho Munnabhai (Blu-Ray) (Indian Cinema / Bollywood Movie / Hindi Film Comedy)[/amazon_link]Review : Lage raho Munnabhai
Rating : Above avergage (3.6/5)
Genre : Comedy
Year : 2006
Director : Rajkumar Hirani
Cast : Sunjay Dutt, Arshad Warsi, Vidya Balan, Boman Irani, Kubhushan Kharbanda, Dilip Prabhavalkar

Lage raho Munnabhai : Good, clean fun !

This one being a sequel to the last Munnabhai film, it begins again with who else – the gangster with a heart of gold – Munnabhai (Dutt). Only Munnabhai is in love this time. And with no less than a beautiful radio jockey, Jhanvi (Balan). Of course the lady in question doesn’t know Munnabhai from Adam, and thus Munnabhai decides to compete in a radio quiz being held by the Radio Station. When he wins, courtesy devoted Circuit (Warsi), he gets a chance to meet the woman of his dreams and be interviewed by her on radio.

Of course when Munnabhai meets her, he attempts to appear educated and suave, naming himself Professor Murli Prasad Sharma. Jhanvi is taken with the Professor and calls him to deliver a lecture on Gandhi (the subject of the earlier Quiz contest) to her Grandad and his old cronies who live in a home the called the “2nd Innings” house. Since Munnabhai is ignorant about Gandhi, he decides read up on him. Bleary eyed from too much reading in 3 days, Munnabhai now appears to actually be able to see Gandhi. This hallucination (Dilip Prabhavalkar) appears to Munnabhai alone, and advises him in Gandhivadi non-violent strategies to life‘s problems.

The lecture goes well, as does the friendship between Jahnavi and Munnabhai. However Jahnavi’s Grandad’s home (2nd Innings House) is wanted by Munnabhai’s friend Lucky Singh (Irani) and he tricks Munnabhai into getting it evacuated. When Munnabhai finds out about the deception he threatens Lucky Singh. However his problems grow manifold, as he must stick to non-violent methods in dealing with Lucky (courtesy his image as the Gandhivadi professor) and must strive to keep from Jahnavi the truth about his real identity . . .

This is a pretty decent comedy although the premise is a bit unbelievable. It works because it’s got some real laugh-out-loud dialogues, keeps away from hammy slap-stick and sticks to a simple (and simplistic) story. The direction is pretty good, the music catchy, and the songs, especially the first two are picturized beautifully. One song “Pal, pal, har pal” is lifted straight from Cliff Richard number “Theme for a dream”.

Vidya Balan dresses in flowing skirts and long kurtis, acts well, and looks charming. Sanjay Dutt’s meager talents carry him through yet another film. The real star here is Arshad Warsi, who as Circuit exudes goodness, bonhomie and “taporiness”, all in perfect proportions. It’s a pity than an actor this fine (see Sehar) must play second fiddle to the likes of Dutt. Irani as Sardar Lucky Singh looks the part but falters in rendering a true Punjabi accent. The actor playing the Gandhi apparition (TV artist Prabhavalkar) does a fine job. Jimmy Shergill, Diya Mirza and Parikshit Sahni appear in small roles.

To find flaws in this film, I must put my thinking cap back on, which is a strict no-no when reviewing desi comedy films. This film could have been better if it had been a little less preachy, hadn’t overdone the emotional scenes, the heroine had better logical and analytical skills, or Gandhism really worked, but considering that we made dormant the logical half of our brains at the door of the packed theatre, one doesn’t mind the unrealistic story too much.

This is a clean, fun film and better than the prequel “Munnabhai MBBS”. Definitely watchable.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, comedy, family-friendly, watchable | 2 Comments

Review : Yun hota to kya hota ?

[amazon_link id=”B002YK49V0″ target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Yun Hota To Kya Hota[/amazon_link]Rating : Above avergage (3.3/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2006
Running time : 2 hrs
Director : Naseeruddin Shah
Cast : Konkona Sen Sharma, Paresh Rawal, Ayesha Takia, Jimmy Shergill, Irfan Khan, Ratna Pathak-Shah, Saroj Khan, Ravi Baswani, Boman Irani, Suhasini Mulay, Ankur Khanna, Shahana Goswami

YUN HOTA TO KYA HOTA : Na hota to achha hota !

First of let me say that I didn’t get the title. If it had been “Yun na hota to kya hota” it would have made more sense. Secondly, having watched Shah as an actor wade through innumerous cinematic parts effortlessly, I had this vision of the movie he would direct. Like when Amol Palekar directed, I KNEW that “Paheli” would be a superb film before I’d seen it or read a review. I had similar expectations with Shah. I’m a little dissapointed because I had expected so much more.

The film seems to have been trashed in all the reviews I’ve read. It’s not that bad, really. The story canvas is large, and there are lots of characters, each apparently unconnected. On top of that, each character has a story which is delved into. Quite a task it is to keep track of which character did what, etc. The story finally converges when all these characters we’ve been introduced to are affected by 9/11 .

There are 4 story tracks running in parallel ; there seemed to be a lot more when I was watching the film. The first is of a newly married woman (Konkona) trying to reach the States to be with her husband (Shergill), inspite of her mean mother-in-law (Carla Singh). The second is of a Gujrati play/entertainment producer (Rawal) who smuggles in young folk via tourist visas, and is now looking to do the same for his ex-girlfriend’s (Ratna Pathak) daughter (Shahana Goswami). Another is of a stock-broker (Irfan Khan) in trouble with the law, who although he runs away from India to the US, leaves his heart behind with two-timing, and older (in age) girlfriend Namrata (Mulay). The 4th story is about brilliant but penurious student Rahul (Ankur) going to the States for further studies with monetary help from his rich friend (Takia).

All the actors are good, but among the new ones, Ankur Khanna showed promise. Ayesha Takia has fattened up, to what I would call a “plump” stage. And Suhasini Mulay pops on screen in tights (she’s a dancer in the film), a very far cry from her sari-clad mother roles in “Sehar”, or “Dil Chahta hai”. Konkona is superb as is Rawal. Rajat Kapoor has a 2 second role as an American (??) at the US Embassy. And if you listen closely all the American accented male voices have been done by Naseeruddin Shah. Saroj Khan, best know as a choreographer, has a small role as Godmother to the stockbroker (Irfan), and does adequately.

I must applaud Shah for realistically fleshing out each of the characters. However in doing this, and going through each characters life one by one, the viewer loses the attachment to “a” protagonist, because there is not one protagonist – there are many and each seems to have equal weightage. Once you stop feeling for a protagnist, all is lost – you don’t care. Not about a character, not about the film, not about Shah, not about the fact that this is his first film and the guy deserves some slack. And that’s the flaw.

Technically the film is good (which is why it gets the above average rating). The story is interesting and well-nuanced, the actors do their job well, and the direction is decent. There is one song, I think which appears as a refrain from time to time. But the movie doesn’t come together overall – as a package. Besides that, the film moves slowly, the director moving with almost loving care to each and every character. And the climax lacks a punch to it. We know that the characters are heading for 9/11, we just don’t how the’ll be affected. This film is neither hot nor cold, it’s just tepid, tepid, tepid.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, drama | 3 Comments