Review : Being Cyrus

[amazon_link id=”B004BF0DQG” target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Being Cyrus (2005) (Hindi Film / Bollywood Movie / Indian Cinema DVD)[/amazon_link]Rating : Average (3.2/5)
Genre : Suspense/Thriller
Year : 2006
Running time : 90 minutes
Director : Homi Adajania
Cast : Saif Ali Khan, Naseeruddin Shah, Dimple Kapadia, Boman Irani, Simone Singh, Honey Chhaya, Manoj Pahwa

BEING CYRUS : DARK !

“Being Cyrus” is very different from regular desi films, because for one thing it’s completely in English, and secondly deals with psychotic characters, deranged in their own, very specific way by dint of their own, very specific circumstance – a subject very rarely touched upon by Bollywood. While the film is about average, and acting here is OK, the characters (especially the psycho ones) needed more in-depth development.

Cyrus (Saif) is an art/pottery student, come to apprentice under the famous, but defunct in his old age, Dinshaw Sethna (Shah). Sethna lives in Panchgani, away from city-life, with his pretty, but dissatisfied wife Katy (Dimple). He also has a brother Farokh (Irani) who lives with his demure, docile wife Tina (Simone) and his old father Fardoonjee (Honey Chaya) in Pune, where Farokh manages his father’s property, an apartment building. As Cyrus settles into the Sethna household and begins an affair with Katy, under Dinshaw’s unsuspecting nose, he along with helping with household chores is often sent into Pune by Katy, with gifts for her father-in-law.

Amiable Cyrus is soon embroiled into Katy’s plan, for what he does not know is that Katy and her brother-in-law love each other, and she’s hatched a scheme to leave Dinshaw and her unexciting life in Panchgani for Farokh and his father’s inheritance . . .

The story is vaguely interesting – you don’t know where it’s going ot what, if anything, it’s building upto. The Sethnas are an odd bunch, Dinshaw amiable but stoned and impractical, Katy, sweet but a screaming banshee, Farokh, cruel and boorish, and Tina, much too docile to be true. Fardoonjee the father is mis-treated by Farokh and borders on senility. We view all these people through Cyrus’s eyes, through Cyris’s narration of the happenings, and we know through snatches of Cyrus’s inner voice that he has emotional problems of his own. A great cast of characters for bizarre happenings and unexpected results.

However, What is frustrating in the script, is that after all this build-up and this seemingly perfect cast of odd characters, it piques your interest with little bits of psycho babble, and a few seemingly disjointed asides/flashbacks but doesn’t deliver on the promise. Probably the flaw in the film lies in that when the climax comes and things start falling into place, it comes with such little impact that it’s not worth the money. Subtlety has it’s virtues but let’s not overdo it. I do think that the second-half of the film sits better than the first half, and as a teacher of mine once put it – If the ending seems to lack punch, the problem is probably in the body of the story, the begining and middle have not been sufficiently developed to prepare the audience for the end.

I also found character development lacking – if you are building a character to be a full-scale mad-man/woman, then you need to do a little more than show the character clutching his/her head in moments of stress. As far as the acting goes, Shah, Manoj Pahwa, Irani are very good. Dimple, a decent actress otherwise, over-acts – her shreiks ring in your ears. Saif tries hard, but his character fails to convince – and that might be character development and not his acting – I’m not sure.

This film is definitely intelligent, put-your-thinking-caps-on cinema. And while it is watchable it’s not an easy-going entertainer for the family.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, drama, watchable | 6 Comments

Review : Taxi No. 9211

Rating : Above average (3.85/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2006
Running time : 2 hrs and 56 minutes
Director : Milan Luthria
Cast : Nana Patekar, John Abraham, Sameera Reddy, Sonali Kulkarni, Shivaji Satam, Ritesh Deshmukh, Kurush Deboo

TAXI No. 9211 : A DEFINITE ENTERTAINER !

This film I enjoyed, despite the fact that it’s based upon a Hollywood film, and despite the fact that when people go around aping Western stories, they generally make a mess of the film. Taxi-No-9211 is different because although the essence is the same (2 guys bent on retribution, and the red haze doesn’t help), it’s sufficiently Indianised with a good old dose of desi morals, and no overt preaching. This is one more film, where instead of the usual boy-meets-girl routine, you actually have a story. Yeah, the story is borrowed, but what the heck – it’s told well, and makes a decent entertainer

Taxi No. 9211 is based upon the Hollywood flick “Changing lanes”, a chance encounter between 2 unknown parties, in this case an arrogant, rich wastrel Jai Mittal (Abraham) about to lose his millions, and an irate, ill-tempered cabbie Raghav Shastri (Patekar). Jai is fighting a court case to get back the millions his dead father has willed to his best friend (Shivaji Sattam), and in a hurry to reach court he takes a cab. He urges the cabbie to drive faster and faster with money, and when there is an accident slips away quietly, leaving Raghav in the lurch. However he accidentally leaves a very important key in the cab.

Raghav is harassed by the police, humiliated, and his wife leaves. Now he’s bent on revenge and it’s all-out war between him and Jai . . .

Acting is good. Patekar plays what he plays best : a borderline psycho. Sonali Kulkarni is very effective as his troubled wife. John Abraham improves his acting here; he seems to get better in every film – in 10 years his films will be a treat to watch ! But, seriously he does relatively well in this young, urban role. Sameera Reddy plays his girlfriend – the girlfriend who looks forward to sharing the riches his Dad’s left him, and while she does OK, her character lacks the spark to get her out of the starlet rut. Besides, she’s gotten chubby. Priyanka Chopra appears in a 2 minute role, and her screen time is felt and remembered, and the director, with the help of some great nostalgic filmi music succeeds in milking that 2 bit appearance with John for all it’s worth. Nicely done – I couldn’t help smiling !

Music is good, with the “Meter down” number probably the best – appeared at the end of the film (on DVD). Direction is good and there are no obvious slip-ups.
A good watch – fulfills it’s entertainment promise.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, drama, recommended | 3 Comments

Review : Maalamaal Weekly

[amazon_link id=”B000I0RVL8″ target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Maalamaal Weekly[/amazon_link]Rating : Above average (3.6/5)
Genre : Comedy
Year : 2006
Running time : 2 hrs and 40 minutes
Director : Priyadarshan
Cast : Paresh Rawal, Om Puri, Ritesh Deshmukh, Reema Sen, Shakti Kapoor, Sudha Chandran, Asrani, Rajpal Yadav, Arbaz Khan

MALAMAAL WEEKLY : A COMEDY Of ERRORS !

I generally look forward to films by Priyadarshan, because they have decent comedy based upon some very humanly idiotic traits. People lie, people are greedy, people are tempted by money ; makes interesting stories. And ML is one such story. Loosely based on Brit. comedy “Waking Ned”, this one is told country-bumpkin style.

Laholi is a poor village, whose inhabitants are knee-deep in debt. The rich money-lender is Thakurani (Sudha Chandran). In the same village live lottery vendor Leelaram (Paresh Rawal), milk-man Balwant (Om Puri), and Balwant’s servant Kanhaiya (Reitesh). Leelaram one day finds out that a ticket he has sold has won the bumper prize of 1 crore. Since most villagers are un-educated, he doesn’t tell anyone of this, but plans to get the ticket back, by inviting all the ticket holders for a dinner. However, the winner of that ticket doesn’t turn up. Leelaram thus decides that it must be the village drunkard Anthony (malyalam actor Innocent) and turns up at his house, only to find him dead.

He now has the ticket but is discovered by Balwant and is forced to make him a partner. They are in turn discovered disposing of the body by Kanhaiya, and are forced to include him too. Events occur and the trio are forced to take on many partners, splitting the anticipated lottery money down by percentages. Now all they have to do is hoodwink the lottery inspector (Arbaz Khan) and get their hands on the money. However this turns out to be a difficult task . . .

This is a funny film, free of the usual double meaning comedy, and relatively “clean”. Paresh Rawal does a great job, and he is ably supported by Puri, and other actors. Script, screen-play and dialogue are apt. There are not many songs (only one I think), so music doesn’t play a big part. Priyadarshan manages to run little sub-plots within the bigger plot, to create a Wodehousian-like comedy. Lots of twists and turns in the story ensure entertainment.

A must-see.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, comedy, family-friendly, recommended | 5 Comments

Review : Water

[amazon_link id=”B000GIXE86″ target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Water[/amazon_link]Rating : Average (3/5)
Genre : Drama Year : 2004
Running time : 1 hr and 44 minutes
Director : Deepa Mehta
Cast : John Abraham, Lisa Ray, Seema Biswas, Manorama, Waheeda Rehman, Raghuvir Yadav, Sarala, Kulbhushan Kharbanda

WATER : Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink !

With “Water” Mehta completes her Trilogy, the controversial “Fire” and the fabulous “Earth” being the earlier two movies. And comparitively, this film is a let-down. While “Fire” was about a lesbian relationship, and “Earth” based upon the novel “Cracking India”, “Water” is the story of the Vrindavan widows. While I applaud Mehta for making a film on this very controversial but important topic, after seeing the film, I feel she tilts the movie for the international film festival circuit, sacrificing quality.

9 year old Chuhiya (Sarala) is newly widowed. With her husband, a man she barely knew, now dead she is sent to the widow ashram to live out the rest of her life. There she meets other widows, all with their shaven heads, measly belongings, frugal lifestyles, doomed to exist in misery. All are older than her, but many have been widowed at early ages (as she finds out later), and now live their lives in penury. Among them is Madhumati (Manorama), the tyrannical, older widow who pimps out the younger, beautiful widow Kalyani (Ray) via eunuch Gulabi (Yadav). Shakuntala (Biswas) is a middle-aged widow in the ashram, the only one who has guts enough to defy Madhumati, but is not willing to stir the waters.

Feisty Chuhiya finds a surrogate mother in Shakuntala, and an older sister in Kalyani. When Kalyani falls in love with Narayan (Abraham) and wishes to leave the ashram to marry him, Madhumati objects but backs down when Shakuntala lends her support to Kalyani. Kalyani leaves to be united with Gandhi-vadi idealist Narayan, but is dis-illusioned when she finds out that he is the son of a wealthy businessman to whom she has been pimped out. On returning when she is faced with the prospect of prostituting for Madhumati, she ends her life. Madhumati then decides to trick young Chuhiya into prostitution . . .

This film has a reasonably strong storyline, but fails because of poor acting from it’s lead pair – John Abraham and Lisa Ray. Seema Biswas, Sarala and Raghuveer Yadav do very well, and pretty much carry this film, along with strong support from stalwarts like Waheeda Rehman and Kulbhushan Kharbanda. Yesteryear actress Manorama is all bluster with no great attempts at finesse. Lisa Ray looks like an urban model, and very little like the character she is supposed to portray. A plain sari cannot hide Ms. Ray’s non-Indian looks, or her accented Hindi. John Abraham looks like the well-read (Bengali ?) babu, but can’t inject realism into Narayan’s character. I am convinced that the presence of strong lead actors (like Rani Mukherjee/Nandita Das/Aamir Khan etc.) could have made this a great film.

The locales look fine, although it is a pity that Mehta couldn’t shoot in India, because of political opposition. The music is mild enough to go un-noticed (I can’t recall it). The film is on the whole, slow-moving – not sure what is at failt there – script or screenplay, and could have done with some tightening up to keep interest. As far as the emotional factor goes, the film does move you – the wretched plight of the widows does get to you. What is absolutely saddening about this is the fact that in watching this it is brought home to you how Indian society actually values women.

So, this film is watchable. However, if looking for arresting, path-breaking cinema, look elsewhere.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, drama | 4 Comments

Review : Tera mera saath rahe

Rating : Above average (3.5/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2001
Director : Mahesh Manjrekar
Cast : Ajay Devgan, Sonali Bendre, Namrata Shirodkar, Shivaji Satam, Dushyant

TERA MERA SAATH RAHE : Edible fare !

There are very few Indian films that deal with disability. TMSR is one the few I’ve seen, which has a modicum of common sense. The storyline wavers a bit, because our hero can’t make up his mind, but otherwise it’s quite OK.

Raj (Devgan) is a hard-working guy, who works outside the home in the daytime, but comes home at night to care for his disabled brother Rahul (Dushyant). In the day-time a kindly servant looks after Rahul. Raj’s next door neighbor is the obviously-in-love-with-Raj Suman (Shirodkar). But Raj is indifferent to her as a love interest, since he’s devoted to his brother. His priorities waver though when he meets lovely Madhuri (Bendre) who is keen on a committed relationship. Madhuri although kind-hearted cannot envisage a life with Raj AND Rahul; she wants Raj to put Rahul in an assisted living facility.

Raj is miserable and torn between Rahul and Madhuri, both of whom he wants. And when Raj does make the heart-wringing decision will he be able to live in peace ? . . .

The film drags in truck-loads of sentimental drama (this being a desi film), but in all fairness does a decent job of portraying Raj’s love for his brother, and Rahul’s obvious dependence on him. Family comes first, of course, but what then happens to one’s personal life ? Is a care-giver not entitled to a life ? These are difficult questions to find answers to, and the film although depicting Raj’s quandary, does not go into much depth, into what happens after. The films ends at a somewhat un-easy balance, where Raj sticks to his guns (amid copious tears and soul-searching) and apparently Madhuri must “adjust”. I did feel sorrowful at the brothers’ plight, but somewhere along the way we get so pompous at sacrificing oneself for family, that practical matters like love and life get swept under the carpet.

Even so, a worth-your-while film.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, drama, watchable | 1 Comment

Review : Iqbal

Rating : Good (3.8/5)

Genre : Drama

Year : 2005

Director : Nagesh Kukunoor

Cast : Shreyas Talpade, Naseeruddin Shah, Girish Karnad, Shweta Prasad, Yateen Karyekar, Prateeksha Lonkar

IQBAL : Heart-warming !
With this film, Kukunoor’s direction comes of age. I’ve seen “Hyderabad blues” and “Iqbal” is a vast, vast improvement over it, in terms of screenplay, direction and execution as a whole. This film is not stylish, has no funky camera angles, or item numbers, no -oh-so-cool people sporting hip wear. All it has is a simple story told well and effectively. Save a few simplistic treatments to the story, which had me raising my eyebrows (is life ever that simple ?), everything else was good.

Iqbal is the story of the lead character, a deaf-mute villageboy (Shreyas Talpade), who dreams of playing cricket. Cricket is his passion, and while herding his buffaloes, he secretly watches, and tries to lip-read cricket coach Guruji (Karnad) coaching his students in the Cricket Academy. In this he is helped by his impish sister Khadija (Shweta Prasad). FInally when Khadija persuades Guruji to look at Iqbal’s talent, Guruji decides to coach him too. This coaching is short-lived when Iqbal gets into a skirmish with an arrogant, rich kid at the academy, and Guruji is forced to let him go in favor of the rich kid.

Iqbal is dissapointed, but is renewed with hope when he discovers that the drunkard Mohit (Shah) he brings food to everyday, is actually an ex-cricket player. Can Iqbal force Mohit sufficiently out of his drinken stupors to actually coach him ? And if so, where does this all lead ? Watch Iqbal to find out.

Firstly, applause for the great acting in the film. Besides the pleasure of seeing stalwarts like Shah and Karnad in the film, Shreyas and Shweta are revelations. Shreyas acts like a pro, while Shweta proves her mettle as she did in Makdee. Besides that, the story is strong, the pace just right, and the situations like the locale believable. Finally a film that relies on itself rather than the snazzy art of film-making ! Sans frills and frippery, this good film is in a class by itself. Nice, nice, nice , is all I can say !

A very worth-while watch.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, drama, family-friendly, recommended | 4 Comments

Review : Zinda

[amazon_link id=”B0016GOMWO” target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Zinda (Bollywood Movie / Indian Cinema / Hindi Film / Sanajy Dutt / John Abraham/ Lara Dutta/ DVD)[/amazon_link]Rating : Poor (2.25/5)
Genre : Thriller
Year : 2006
Running time : About 2 hours
Director : Sanjay Gupta
Cast : Sanjay Dutt, John Abraham, Lara Dutta, Celina Jaitley, Mahesh Manjrekar, Raj Zutshi

ZINDA : Blood and gore !

Undoubtedly the most violent Hindi film I’ve seen, Zinda is a direct lift of the award-winning Korean film “Old Boy”. I haven’t seen “Old Boy” but am told that “Zinda” is almost a frame-by-frame copy, except at the end, where the original motive (incest) is replaced by one (apparently) palatable to Indian audiences. I, for one don’t get that. Oh, we can’t see incest, but any other form of female degradation is quite acceptable !

Balajit Roy (Dutt) a software engineer has come to Bangkok , with wife (Jaitley) in tow. One day he mysteriously dissappears. He’s held in solitary confinement in a one-room jail, for 14 years, with only a TV for company, by an unknown adversary for some unknown reason. His wife is killed, and he is setup for the murder. After 14 years, he’s released into the outside world, and his one mission then is to find his enemy and the reason for the imprisonment. This he does with (little) help from cab-driver Jenny Singh (Dutta), and comes face-to-face with his nemesis, rich tycoon Rohit Chopra (Abraham). What follows is pure cinematic drivel.

The story of the film is interesting and keeps you hooked. What doesn’t is Mr. Flab himself, Sunjay Dutt. As if it wasn’t bad enough that the guy couldn’t act !The non-actor has company though, there is John who in this film comes across as the stony faced sophisticate (here lack of acting skills actually help him remain expressionless !), and there is Lara who’s acting as a Punjabi kudi. Never mind that she can’t carry off a Punjabi accent, and speaks Hindi like she’s spouting French ! If Her Hipness can be an earthy “Jenny Singh”, then the day of dumb directors has come. Jaitley flits through the 2 miniscule scenes she has in low-waisted hipsters. Mahesh Manjrekar appears as Roy’s friend. And Raj Zutshi appears convincing as the local mafioso handling the details of the imprisonment (the one actor in the entire film who can actually act, but alas, he hardly has a role).

The film is sickeningly violent, the weapons of choice being an automatic drill and a hammer. Along with visions of the drill tearing into human flesh, and dental extraction (sans anaesthesia) with the help of the hammer, we also get ringside seats to watch Roy getting stitched up after attempting suicide. Definitely not a film for the faint-hearted.

Apart from the stomach-turning visuals, Gupta has nothing to offer. The film is insipid with the watered down motive, and the characters appear unbelievable. Dutt’s character shows less signs of being a (relatively educated) software engineer, and more signs of being a depraved whacko. Manjrekar, as his odious friend doesn’t add to the upliftment much.

The film’s music is the only good thing coming out of here. And for that you need the Cd, not the DVD. A firm Do-NOt-WATCH for this film.

Posted in 2006, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13, thriller | 2 Comments

Review : Bluffmaster

[amazon_link id=”B004UQLVXU” target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Bluffmaster (2005) (Hindi Film / Bollywood Movie / Indian Cinema DVD)[/amazon_link]Rating : Above average (3.65/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2005
Running time : 2 hrs and 17 minutes
Director : Rohan Sippy
Cast : Abhishek Bachchan, Priyanka Chopra, Riteish Deshmukh, Nana Patekar, Boman Irani

BLUFFASTER : Fast-paced and entertaining !

Directors today are trying on the con-man tack : make the hero a criminal, a good-hearted con-man, indulging in heists which involve sometimes simple, sometime complicated charades. There is ofcourse no murder, etc.; considering the guy has a heart of gold. Take Bunty aur Babli, as an example. And then take “Bluffmaster”. The common factor : Abhishek Bachhan. As a casual criminal with a saucy manner.

OK, so now we have con-man Roy (Bachhan), pretending to be legit. in front of his paramour Simmi (Priyanka Chopra). But, as it happens Simmi finds out the nasty truth, and that’s the end of that. Roy in another twist of fate is diagnosed with a fatal sickness, which promises to sink him in 3 months. Roy bereft of lady-love resolves to do one good thing before leaving this world, and that good thing is helping his apprentice Dittu (Ritesh) hoodwink the mobster (Patekar) who hurt his family.

Who gets conned and who doesn’t is the rest of the story . . .

Rohan Sippy has directed this film with panache – his education shows. “Kuch na kaho”, Sippy’s earlier presentation was nice, but not this nice. The scenes are snappy, with narrative cuts not commonly seen in our Hindi films. Another remarkable thing about this film is the gorgeous back-ground music, which makes every scene come alive. I mean in most average desi films, you have the standard background tune, repeated in each and every film. Not here though. The screen-play is fine, but the dialogues are a bit too filmi. The only problem I had with the story was with the believability – how plausible is it really ? If you leave that part out, the film is good fun.

Abhishek is very good in another “Bunty” like role, this time hogging the lime-light (no Rani to contend with). Priyanka looks good, but doen’t improve on her acting. And Riteish is pretty hammy. Patekar is his usual psycho self – which is great for the role. Irani as Roy’s doctor is dissapointing, or maybe it was his role. The film has good songs, with foot-tapping numbers like “say-na, say-na”, and remixes like “Sabse bada rupaiyya”. The British group Trickbaby has a couple of songs, and although I don’t like Trickbaby too much, their songs seemed to fit right in.

Posted in bollywood, drama, recommended | 2 Comments

Review : Maine Gandhi ko nahin maara

[amazon_link id=”B000MDH5VM” target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Maine Gandhi Ko Nahin Mara[/amazon_link]Rating : Above average (3.55/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2005
Running time : 1 hr and 25 minutes
Director : Jahnu Barua
Cast : Anupam Kher, Urmila Matondkar, Rajat Kapoor, Addy, Divya Jagdale, Boman Irani, Parvin Dabbas, Waheeda Rehman, Vishwaas Pandya

MAINE GANDHI KO NAHIN MAARA : Poignant and moving, but loses impact

This film turned out to be quite different from what I’d expected, at least as far as storyline goes. From the title I’d gauged it to be about Gandhi’s assasination. However it turns out to be set in modern-day Mumbai, about a father and daughter’s relationship, and the relevance of Gandhism in modern times. Produced by Anupam Kher, the script and direction are both by Jahnu Barua.

Prof. Uttam Chaudhary (Kher) is a retured Hindi professor, living with his daughter Trisha (Urmila), and son Addy (Addy). Ronu (Kapoor) his other son, lives in America, but helps support the family financially. The professor, a man of great integrity and honesty, considered a genius in his time is slowly losing his mind, to what appears to be a curious mixture of Alzheimer’s and schizophrenia. And even more strangely, he appears beset by the thought, that he has assasinated Gandhi. His home appears now to him as a jail, and he sees his children as jailors. His paranoia grows, much to the distress of his daughter, who is his one steadfast supporter, and is not willing to give up on him.

For this she switches doctors, meeting a new doctor (Dabbas) and his senior Dr. Verma (Prem Chopra). The good doctor, having tried all tacks, now resolves to try a rather radical experiment to rid the professor of his paranoia. Does he succeed ?

As I’m seeing this film, I’m wondering where it’s going, really. Because the story is different and wavers, you have no idea what to expect, or what the possible ending could be. And the ending (all that courtroom drama) stretches your imagination a bit too much, first of all as to the plausibility of the entire setup , since otherwise this film is so “real”. In hind-sight I see where all this was going and the point the director was trying to make, but me thinks that such a storyline and the required impact is more suited to the theatre than the silver screen, because a stage-play can make use of the fantastic/meta-physical, and twist reality to make a point. In a film, such flights of fancy have to have very strong sceenplays, and be mired in great direction, or else they don’t take flight. Precisely what’s happened here.

This is the big flaw in this film – it mixes the real and the fantastic to it’s own detriment. I mean, it’s all very noble to have a vision (I have tons of them, really), but if you can’t potray that vision believably, then it’s not doing much good. Thus, in this case, when it comes, the thrust is half-baked and sluggish. This film has under-currents of idealism and patriotism, although they come to the fore-front rather late. Direction could have been crisper, although acting by Kher and Urmila is very good. Rajat Kapoor and Addy also do a good job. Dabbas as the doctor has way too puffy hair, to appear a good doctor, me snidely thinks. And Prem chopra is a disaster as Dr. Verma – look pretty villainish, instead of looking saintly. I felt he was going to whip out a knife any minute, instead of spouting that doctorly dialogue.

Still, way better than the average Bollywood film, this deserves a viewing.

Posted in bollywood, drama, watchable | Comments Off on Review : Maine Gandhi ko nahin maara

Review : Shikhar

Rating : Average (3/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2005
Running time : 2 hrs and 43 minutes
Director : John Mathew Mathan
Cast : Ajay Devgan, Shahid Kapoor, Amrita Rao, Bipasha Basu, Javed Sheikh, Sushant Singh, Farah

SHIKHAR : Holier than thou !

Although not bad by general Bollywood standards, this film is a dissapointment coming from Mathan, who directed the excellent Sarfarosh. This film is not only excessively preachy, it suffers from shallow characterization; everyone in the film is either bad/black or extremely pure/white. There are no grey shades to give depth.OK, so we have ex-businessman Vardhan (Sheikh) giving up his tycoon-dom to build an ashram near tribal-lands and turn all pious and holy. Then we have builder GG (Devagn) trying to get at the fertile lands of the ashram and surrounding areas, to build a modern township for the NRIs. But Vardhan Guruji amid mutterances of “Shubham” stands unmoved refusing to sell land, and even stopping GG by means of a court order. Having failed all methods of persuading Guruji, GG then tries influencing Guruji’s young son Jaidev (Kapoor). Jaidev is young, lacks common sense and easily falls prey to GG. So does he go against darling Dad or “friend” GG ?

Guessing the ending is left as an exercise to the reader. If you’re using more than one grey cell to think about this, you’re working too hard.

OK, for starters, let’s use our heads and not call the villain “GG”, it sounds like you’re addressing your sister ! Next let’s not pepper the film with articulations of “Shubham” or “Voila” – not only is this nauseating, it has left me supremely traumatised to the sound of either. Thirdly, let’s not do the “holier than thou” thing; besides being extremely annoying to watch, it also alienates viewers. Therefore, from the above statements we can infer that the film while having potential failed to execute on aforesaid potential, and left me snorting in disbelief and writhing in paroxysms of annoyance.

The story of the film, is well, not unbelievable but very predicatable, which kind of takes the fun out of things, me thinks. And the music is terrible. However, in it’s defense the film is qualitatively shot, and is bolstered by Devgan’s performance. Bipasha Basu and Amrita Rao remain inconsequential as the women in GG and Jaidev’s lives. Shahid is the usual : bad. Sushant Singh who was so admirably used in Sehar is truly wasted in a semi-comic (??) role. Javed Sheikh, while spouting “shudh” Hindi remains stony.

And Mathan has either lost his head or his touch.

Still, relatively better than regular Bollywood fare, this is watchable. If you have one of those anti-“Shubham” shields, keep it handy.

Posted in bollywood | Comments Off on Review : Shikhar