Review : Deewane huye paagal

Rating : Poor (2.5/5)
Genre : All-in-one
Year : 2005
Running time : Approx. 2.5 hrs
Director : Vikram Bhatt
Cast : Akshay Kumar, Rimi Sen, Shahid Kapoor, Sunil Shetty, Aftab Shivadasani, Paresh Rawal, Om Puri, Vijay Raaz, Suresh Menon, Supriya Pilgaonkar

DEEWANE HUYE PAGAL : A mind-numbing mess !

This film started off well, with a poetic narrative from Vivek Oberoi, and I was hoping for a Wodehouse-ian comedy. However, the film soon degenerated into what can only be called an absolute mess of perfectly good tripe. To be fair, the begining and end are OK, it’s the big, stretchy middle which is the problem. If this is a remake of “There’s something about Mary”, it’s a pretty pathetic one.The film has 2 plots, out of which one actually gave me hope. The first deals with a scientist (Puri) who discovers the formula to ever-lasting youth, and plans to sell it. However, his assistant betrays him, and tries to sell the formula to the scientist’s criminal twin brother. The scientist however manages to lock the formula’s secret into a safe, records the safe’s combination into a voice-recording parrot-toy, and runs away with it. Before the goons murder him, he slips the parrot into a girl’s (Sen) bag. The girl witnesses the murder, and the criminals see her, but she manages to escape. The criminals get the safe but not the code, and are unable to open it.

Now for the second plot : Tanya (Sen) is a happy-go-lucky college girl, without parents, but has a retarded younger brother (an aging Rakesh Bedi). What she uses for money is anybody’s guess – maybe she’s an heiress ! Anyway, poor Karan (Kapoor) who is a student and works in the college canteen to make end’s meet is besotted with her. And she comes to like him too. It is to his B’day celebration that she’s driving when she encounters the scientist, and he unbeknownst to her slips the parrot into the gift she’s carrying for Karan.

After witnessing the scientist’s murder, Tanya, scared for her life, goes back home, gathers up her belongings and her brother, and runs away. Karan waits for her, but realises she’s left, when he comes to her home to find her. He finds the gift she was bringing to him, looks inside and finds the parrot, and believing it to be from her, keeps it as a treasured memory. He still tries to find her, and gets news that she’s in Dubai living with an aunt. Hence intelligent Karan, and the canteen’s owner Murugan, hire Rocky (Akshay Kumar) to find her in Dubai, and Karan gives Rocky the parrot to show to Tanya as a sign of recognition/love.

Rocky travels to Dubai, finds her, and falls in love with her himself. Being a crook of the first order, he gives Karan a story about Tanya being married and disabled etc. Karan is undeterred however and wishes to assist her, therefore stays back in Dubai. He soons finds out that Tanya has changed her name to Natasha, and Rocky has been decieving him because of his own feelings for Tanya.

Tanya’s coterie consists of her aunt (Supriya Pilgaonkar), handicapped Tommy (Paresh Rawal), wanna-be-boyfriend and handicapped architect Sanju (Shetty). Now Tommy, Sanju, Rocky and Karan, and a blind scooterist (Asrani) are all vying for Tanya’s love, and Tanya’s just the innocent babe in the woods. Now who actually gets her ? Also you’ve got to be wondering about the first plot, and the parrot, which is currently in Rocky’s custody. It all mashes together in the end, with some interesting chase sequences, and the daily dose of sacrifice (we are desi, what to do ?).

Now for the acting : Shahid Kapoor and Rimi Sen are bad actors – plain and simple. Johnny Lever as Murugan overacts and is not funny. On Puri, Suresh Menon (as Puri’s son) and Vijay Raaz (as Rocky’s side-kick) contribute hugely towards the comedy. Paresh Rawal and Akshay Kumar are good in their roles, and Supriya Pilgaonkar is about average.

The film moves at a pretty fast clip, there’s lots happening and it’s happening really fast. Sandwiched in-between are the songs, which don’t uplift the movie any. Direction is OK although the film’s story has BIG kinks in it. Even ignoring some of the minor ones, here’s a biggie : Why is Tanya/Natasha who’s so scared for her life, that she’s actually changed her name, attempting to be a singing star (a public figure) and prancing about on television ? Won’t the killers actually find her then ?

Oh, well ! I can’t recommend this movie. But if you absolutely ignore the voice in your head that tells you that the director is insane, you might be able to sit through this one.

Posted in 2005, bollywood, drama | Comments Off on Review : Deewane huye paagal

Review : Main meri patni aur woh

[amazon_link id=”B000G27FEG” target=”_blank” container=”” container_class=”” ]Main Meri Patni Aur Woh[/amazon_link] Rating : Above average (3.75/5)
Genre : Comedy
Year : 2005
Director : Chandan Arora
Cast : Rajpal Yadav, Kaykay Menon, Rituparna Sengupta, Vinod Nagpal, Varun Badola

MAIN MERI PATNI AUR WOH : Interesting situational comedy

Take a look at Indian society. Look closely at our hang-ups with marriage : caste/creed, gender, height, color, weight, wealth etc. Into this prejudicial society introduce a short, plain, unassuming man, and his tall, beautiful, vivacious wife. And let the fireworks begin.MMPAW is a very detailed look at the life of Lucknow based Mithilesh Shukla (Yadav), a regular, non-descript sort of a guy, who has washed his hands off marriage, until his nagging mom and her concerned brother (Vinod Nagpal) get him to see Veena (Sengupta) as a prospective bride. Veena is beautiful, cultured, educated and pretty much everything Mithilesh wants. She is also leggy, a good 6″ taller than our hero. This doesn’t concern him too much, until he overhears people talk and laugh at his relative lack of stature/looks. Everyday situations, such as driving a scooter, with a tall wife towering from the back-seat, or a fawning doodh-wala (milk-man) delivering milk, become a nagging headache for the insecure Mithilesh. More problems crop up when Veena’s good college friend, the TALL, worldly, smart Akash (Menon) moves into the flat next door, and jealousy consumes Mithilesh, leading him into a quagmire of problems, which threaten to rip apart his life.

Akash is everything Mithilesh is not. He’s charming, suave, interesting and has the gift of the gab, as compared to our awe-struck librarian. Mithilesh in attempt to be more like him, tries medicene from quacks, and exercise, and even tries to imitate Akash’s style. But does that help ? See the film to find out.

This is very off-beat film, with outstanding performances from the cast. Yadav and Menon are masters at their art, and Rituparna is no less. Varun Badola as Salim, Mithilesh’s friend, manages just the right amount of exhuberance. And Vinod Nagpal (remember him from “Humlog” ?) as the “Mama” is very convincing. Characters are well-fleshed out, and the dialogues are apt for the situations and the locale.

The film is told completely from Mithilesh’s view-point, his fears and his paranoia form the crux of the problem. We see Veena, Akash, Salim and others as Mithilesh sees them. Admittedly there are flaws. By the nature of it’s telling the film is slow, the pace is of day-to-day happenings. And the story has it’s kinks, which seem unrealistic. Veena’s character changes subtly through the film, from a thoughful girl (what else would you call a girl who chooses a husband not for his height but his intellect, i.e.; one not influenced by society’s prejudices) to one who wants romantic, candle-lit dinners, and that for me took away some of the impact.

Chandan Arora, who brought us the stellar “Main Madhuri Dixit banna chahti hoo” (see best films of 2003) impresses once again with this delightful film. Touted as a comedy, MMPAW is actually more of a thoughful drama, with doses of realistic humor, and a welcome change from the mind-numbing slapstick which passes for Hindi cinema these days. A must-see.

Posted in 2005, bollywood, comedy, drama, rating-PG13, recommended | Tagged | 9 Comments

Review : James

Rating : Average (3/5)
Genre : Action
Year : 2005
Director : Rohit Jugraj
Cast : Mohit Ahlawat, Nisha Kothari, Zakir Husain, Mohan Agashe, Rajpal Yadav, Ravi Kale, Snehal Dabhi, Sherveer Vakil

: Intense slam-fest !

Another film from the RGV camp, James is the debut vehicle for newcomers Mohit Ahlawat, and Nisha Kothari, and director Jugraj. Out of its running-time, approximately 2/3rd is what I would call a slam fest. The villains keep coming and the hero keeps beating them to pulp. Nice, on the philosophical level, where one roots for the common man. However, in the reality of commercial cinema this turns into gory fight sequences and bone-crunching assaults drawn a little too long.

The story is an oft-repeated one; the honest common-man James (Ahlawat) in conflict with the corrupt, power-drunk Neta Shanti Narayan (Hussain) and his hairy brother Radhey (Vakil). Add to the mix, model Nisha (Kothari), daughter of the DCP of Mumbai (Agashe), stir with a filmi wand, and there you have the story of “James”. Radhey lusts after Nisha, and James believes in doing the right thing, which means protecting Nisha when her DCP father seems unable to lift a finger against the wrong-doers. Thus James and Radhey meet. Now Radhey lusts for Nisha and James’s blood, which throws the pair togther in jungles and other scenic locales, on the run. Radhey chases and James and Nisha run/defend. And this goes on until the end.

The film focusses on in-your-face violence, and there is hardly any other emotion in the film. Raw action is the USP of the film, raw being the keyword. Much of the movie is just plain fighting, with swords, fists, guns etc. Kothari acts passably, and bares quite a bit, donning the most negligible of mini-skirts. Not really heroine material, she strikes me as a younger version of Khushboo. Well-muscled Mohit Ahlawat has a serious angry young man role, and he uses his limited repertoire to exhibit one, maybe two (and that’s a stretch) emotions through the entirety of the film. James is a pretty uni-dimensional character; we know he’s a good guy, but what is he actually like ? Ahlawat doesn’t give us any clues. It remains to be seen if he can actually act, in a role which requires more than expressions of anger/intensity. Acting apart, he has screen presence, and is . . . visually appealing. Shows promise.

Zakir Hussain does well as the diabolic Shanti N., while Sherveer Vakil is convincing as the venomous Radhey. Agashe in a small role in as good as ever, while Yadav prances through his comic role. The film has a distinctly Southie flavor to it. James’s friend Babloo (Snehal Dabhi in a highly overdone role) seemed to have walked in straight from a Tamil/Telugu film. The song picturisations are a la Rangeela, and Kothari is made up like an early Matondkar too.

Direction is sharp, but hurried. The fight sequences are shot well to maximise impact, allowing the hero to flip villains on their backs with ease, and break necks and wrists with a flick of his fingers. The cinematography relies on shadows, and dark alleys to pump up the intensity of the chase. Dialogues are a mix of realism and overdone filmi sound-bytes. Amar Mohile’s sound-track is a mixed bag, aiding the film at places, but also a pain in the head in others. The songs are just about OK, nothing to write to Mum about.

All said and done, “James” is still worth a watch.

Posted in 2005, action, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13, thriller, watchable | 1 Comment

Review : Chocolate

Rating : Average (3/5)
Genre : Thriller
Year : 2005
Running time : 159 minutes
Director : Vivek Agnihotri
Cast : Irfan Khan, Sushma Reddy, Anil Kapoor, Arshad Warsi, Sunil Shetty, Emran Hashmi, Tanushree Dutta

CHOCOLATE : Edible, but only just !

The film is based in London, and is about a mysterious murder, robbery, arm theft and the resolution of it all. Shot differently, the story is narrated via intermittent flashbacks, interspersed with the present day. And although commendable in it’s effort, this desi adaptation of “The Usual Suspects” drags it’s feet, and lacks pace in the first half. Shallow, one dimensional characters do not garner audience sympathy. The second half has one intrigued but does not come together.

Chip, Deva, Rocker, PP and Sim are 5 musical friends, who come together to make music in the evenings after their day jobs end. Sim or Simran (Dutta) is a lucre-loving gold-digger, PP (Irfan Khan) an artist, Chip (Warsi) a computer hacker, and Rocker (Shetty) steals cars. Devaa (Hashmi) is a musician. Among these five people with very different personalities, there are under-current of conflict and attraction. Mysteriously one day, a sum of 20 million pounds is stolen, and 30 people are killed on a boat carrying arms. Rocker, also dead, is blamed and his friends Sim and PP are hauled in for questioning by the British cops. Monsoon, a journalist gets wind of the news, and persuades cocky and succesful attorney Krish Pundit to take their case.

As Krish delves into the intricacies of the case, and tries to get the story out of Sim and PP, many versions emerge. The depiction of the story versions, in flashbacks, take up most of the film. Krish then defends them in the court. Does he succeed in setting them free ?

The first half of the film is insipid. The second half fares better. Kapoor is full of bluster and swagger, and unbelievable, and looks unintelligent. Warsi as Chip has a short role, and is wasted in inconsequentialities. Among the rest, the only one who can act is Irfan Khan, and he does a good job as the sly, manipulative PP. Tanushree, poured into skin-tight, miniscule bits of clothing, desperately needs to improve her acting. Sushma Reddy in very mismatched, non-chic clothing (is this what British journalists wear ?) adds very little to this film, with her non-existent acting skills (or was it the badly defined role/character ?).

Direction is passable, but not consistent. The dialogues are flashy and screenplay not watertight (as it should be when attempting a suspense film). The script has moments of interest in the post-interval half, and obvious red-herrings are scattered throughout (what ? cinema for dolts ?). Honestly if you can get through the first half, (where I was sorely tempted to shut off the film) it does get better. I was intrigued by the whole rapidly changing story thing – so yes there’s suspense. The characters are highly unlikeable people, mild deviants really, badly developed in the film, so you really aren’t rooting for anyone, and you don’t really care if they live or die. This is a major flaw.

The music of the film is very good, almost all numbers haunting and catchy. “Halka halka sa” reminded me of “Pehla Nasha” from “Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikandar”.

All-in-all worth watching once.

Posted in 2005, bollywood, drama | 1 Comment

Review : My wife’s murder

Rating : Average (3/5)
Genre : Suspense
Year : 2005
Running time : 1 hr and 43 minutes
Director : Jijy Philip
Cast : Anil Kapoor, Suchitra Krishnamurthy, Nandana Sem, BomanIrani, Rajesh Tandon, Abhijit Lahiri

MY WIFE’S MURDER : Novel effort !

The RGV camp innovates and tries new things. MWM is one such novel effort. And although different, this films lack the pace, and the power to keep one engrossed. This is a fine film, but you can’t call it gripping.

Ravi Patwardhan (Kapoor) is a film editor, working with apprentice Reena (Sen). Ravi is married to suspicious Sheela (Krishnamurthy), who doubts Ravi and Reena’s relationship, and harangues Ravi about it no end. Reena meanwhile, daughter of a moneyed man, is living in with her boyfriend (Tandon), but sympathizes with Ravi’s frustrations at home.

Sheela’s parents invite Sheela, Ravi and their two children on a trip to Shirdi with them, but Ravi pleads work and refuses to go. He does ask Sheela to go if she wants to. This stokes Sheela’s jealousy, and she nags mild Ravi about his supposed affair with Reena again. In a subsequent marital squabble, Ravi pushes Sheela, and she falls hitting her head on the wooden bed bolster. Unexpectedly she dies. Ravi panics and disposes of the body. When her parents raise a hue and cry about her dissapearance and file a police complaint, Inspector Tejpal Randhawa (Irani) gets in hot pursuit. His number one suspect : Ravi.

Philip’s direction although adequate, falters in some sequences. The actors do well, whether it be Kapoor with his depiction of a broken, listless man, or Krishnamurty in her effective potrayal of a shrill nag. Sen imbues her character with the right nuances; an apprentice sure, but are there hidden feelings for her boss ? Tandon as the live-in boyfriend, torn between jealousy and self-preservation, is very good. Irani excels in his role of food-chomping Inspector Tejpal, appearing fair and conniving at the same time. The character of Sheela’s father’s is essayed well by Abhijit Lahiri.

The cinematography and the look of the film is realistic – Ravi’s home is as middle-class as it should be. Dialogues are apt. However, I found the background score problematic, in that it didn’t help build suspense in a film where it was sorely needed. Also the film should have been tauter; it drags needlessly in some sequences. The ending lacks finality and the satisfaction a movie-goer expects, kind of like in the Matrix, where you expected closure, but at the end they told you to come see it in Part 3. If the USP of the film is potraying the cat-and-mouse game between the police and the supposedly innocent man, it succeeds, but that’s pretty much it.

The above notwithstanding, MWM is definitely worth a watch.

Posted in 2005, bollywood, drama, rating-PG13, thriller | Comments Off on Review : My wife’s murder

Review : Salaam Namaste

Rating : Average (3/5)
Genre : All-in-one
Year : 2005
Running time : 2 hrs and 40 minutes
Director : Siddharth Raj Anand
Cast : Saif Ali Khan, Preiti Zinta, Arshad Warsi, Jugal Hansraj, Tania Zaetta, Abhishek Bachhan, Javed Jafri

SALAAM NAMASTE : More juvenile fare

On the juvenile-O-meter this film fares a little better than “Hum-tum” , i.e.; it’s a little less juvenile. The story seemed to be actually interesting, until director Anand infused it with a dose of Hindi film surrealism. Direction is adequate although the screenplay certainly isn’t; certain situations seem to hiccup in execution. The script is riddled with improbabilities. On the bright side though, the songs are hum-able and well-shot, the Australian locales are beautiful, and the film has great dollops of comedy which shore it up no end.Ambar Malhotra (Zinta) is a student-doctor in Melbourne, radio-jockeying part-time to pay the bills. Her program’s name is ““. She comes into contact with architect-turned-chef Nikhil Arora, when he doesn’t turn up for a interview on her radio program. Infuriated by his lack of punctuality and courtesy (no apology etc.) she sets out to defame him via the air-waves. When Nick calls her up to reproach her for her offensive words against him, they give each other an earful.

 

Nikhil prefers to be called Nick and is the chef of restaurant Nick-of-Time. At a marriage where his resaturant is catering the food, Nick meets Ambar, although the two not having seen each other, have no idea that the other is anathema. Nick introduces himself as an architect, and Ambar introduces herself as a student surgeon. The attraction is strong and doesn’t diminish even when the two realise each other’s true identities. They end up falling in love, and moving in together into a glorious villa by the sea.

All is hunky-dory until Ambar gets pregnant . . .

The first half is juvenile fare, and bears great similarity to Hum-tum. The second-half is tolerable. Saif and Priti act decently enough, with Priti at her shrillest best. Warsi as Nick’s friend is good and adds to the comedy. Tania Zaetta as Susan, Warsi’s wife in the film is just about OK. However, Javed Jafri steals the show as a desi-Aussie “Crocodile Dundee” style landlord, with his wonderful English, his “Sorry” spouting Aussie girlfriend and classic “mis-quotes” such as “When in Rome, do the Romans”. Abhishek Bachhan in the latter-half slapstick scenes displays a flair for the comic. Jugal Hansraj as Ambar’s fellow student doen’t have much of a role, and pretty much serves as the shoulder to cry on.

Now for the kinks. Similar to Hum-tum, SN also tries oh-so-hard to be oh-so-cool. When taking in Saif’s bachelor pad for the first time we see objects like a cap with the words “Work Sucks”, a goldfish bowl, a laptop etc — all the evidence needed to prove how hip the guy is. When he clambers out of bed, he wears “Superman” logo-ed shorts, flexes his biceps, and mutters “Oh, crap” every chance he gets. Such a display of “hip-ness”, it makes me light-headed. Ms. Zinta’s character doesn’t lag too far behind. A student-doctor with far too much free time on her hands (sure don’t make the Indian dames work too hard in Aussie-land, do they ?); she employs it to party, RJ, decorate and watch movies.

Although based on an interesting premise, i.e.; exploring the live-in relationship, the film fails to get to the meat of the matter, being content to wallow in shallow, frothy waters. The sets and the clothes, and the “look” is well-detailed. The dialogues and situations are not. At the marriage where Ambar and Nick meet, everyone is young and yuppie, no older folks and no children are present (whatever happened to friends and family ?). After the ceremony the entire marriage party throws off their dressy outfits to reveal swimsuits and revel in an impromptu song-and-dance beach party. After the beach party, tents conveniently sprout up on the sand, and all nod off for a siesta. Kind of a hard to believe scenario, unless someone tells me that such marriages-cum-beach parties-cum-slumber parties are de rigeur in the land down under.

In such a yuppie, young, urban film, the thing I’d least expected to see was the display of women in a deragatory/patriarchial light. But it’s there nonetheless, whether it be in Nick’s comparison of a wife and a mistress (he’s using it as an analogy for dish presentation, no less), or his callow, use-and-throw attitude towards a woman with whom he’s apparently spent the night. Really, even for Hindi films, can we not have a single grown-up hero, one who’ll not give in to the “boys-will-be-boys” charade ? More breaks in reality come in the form of Ambar’s prancing and dancing abilities when massively pregnant with twins. Obviously the director has never been pregnant, but has he SEEN pregnant women ?

OK, what it boils down to is – if you liked “Hum-tum” you will love SN. If like me you though Hum-Tum was pathetic, you might want to wait for “Salaam Namaste”‘s DVD release.

Posted in 2005, bollywood, romance, watchable | 7 Comments

Review : Mangal Pandey

Rating : Average (3/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2005
Running time : 2 hrs and 30 minutes
Director : Ketan Mehta
Cast : Aamir Khan, Rani Mukherjee, Amisha Patel, Toby Stephens, Kiron Kher, Tom Alter

: Nothing to make a “halla” over !

When an actor like Amir Khan comes out of self-imposed hibernation after 4 years, the film had better be good. Or so I thought. MP falls way below expectations. The plot ofcourse is historical – the great Sepoy Mutiny of 1857. However the director has been unable to make up his mind : documentary or compendium of item numbers and bare skin ? Honestly I was bored. The film should have been half the length it was, and tauter; unnecessary filmi extensions and sequences of Holi and dancing in kothas drag down this film. The problem : it’s too documentar-ish for a commercial film, and too commercial to be a documentary – neither here nor there.

Mangal Pandey (Khan) is a loyal Sepoy in the British Army and good friends with white British officer William Gordon (Toby Stephens). Trouble brews when the British change rifles, and force Indian sepoys to use them. The rifles use cartridges greased with pig and cow fat, unacceptable to both Hindu and Muslim Sepoys. The Sepoys led by MP rise up in revolt. MP is caught and hung, but this only stokes the fire of rebellion. The film ends with MP’s death.

Inserted into the film are vignettes on MP’s life; his friendship with Gordon and the pranks they pull off, his romance with prostitute Heera (Mukherjee), and his altercations with the untouchable village sweeper. The movie also presents a colorful Holi song-dance and a depiction on “Sati” with Patel playing the widow, Jwala. Jwala is rescued from the Sati pyre by Gordon, and in time becomes his mistress.

The film is narrated by veteran actor Om Puri. The narration throughout the film made me compare MP to Doordarshan’s yesteryear serial “Bharat Ek Khoj”. And “BEK” was better. MP is a history lesson cavorting as a masala-movie-wanna-be. I’m not a history-buff, but I’d expected the film to breathe life into a textual character. And Khan, while he acts well, is too full of fire and bluster to be an intelligent Mangal Pandey. Brave – yes, imbued with common-sense – no. The swagger and the hair don’t help either.

Mukherjee and Patel have little to do. Kiron Kher and large amounts of her cleavage appear fleetingly in a few scenes. Toby Stephens does well and steals the show as Gordon. The music is terrible; the songs are little more than words strung on a few drum-beats and item-numbers have been forced into the film. The Sophia Haque village dance is pretty awkward for a period film, and Rani’s Mujra does little to evoke interest.

Not recommended, unless you’re an AVID history-buff, and unwilling to cringe at the sight of winking sexpots.

Posted in 2005, bollywood, drama, historical, watchable | Comments Off on Review : Mangal Pandey

Review : Yahaan

Rating : Below average (2.9/5)
Genre : Drama
Year : 2005
Director : Shoojit Sircar
Cast : Jimmy Shergill, Minisha Lamba, Yashpal Sharma, Mukesh Tiwari

: Dreary !

Ad-film maker Sircar’s first foray into films, Yahaan is one long stretched-out film. The subject tries to straddle both romance and war in one go, and that’s difficult to carry off with aplomb. Full marks to Sircar for trying. Unfortunatly, he doesn’t succeed. Although the film on the whole is decently-made and displays sensitivity, the pace is EXTREMELY slow (I nodded off a couple of times). Another turn-off was the bluish tint of the film – gave it a dull, depressing aura. As beautiful as the Kashmir valley is, seeing it in real color would probably have added the much-needed sparkle to this movie.

Captain Aman (Shergill) is a fearless army-man posted in Kashmir. Humane Aman protests against his superior, Major Rathod’s (Tiwari) callous disregard for human dignity and earns his wrath. Also via the medium of tea and torches, falls for local girl Adaa (Lamba), and she for him. The attachment is opposed by her father, and the locals who are wary of the Indian army, and outsiders.

Meanwhile, in the line of duty, Aman is captured by terrorist Shakeel (Sharma), who is Adaa’s brother. Adaa, in desperation manages to rescue Aman from Shakeel. However, when Adaa and Shakeel’s relationship is known, Aman is suspected and brought up for a court-martial for having links with terrorists. How the mess gets resolved makes for quite a shaky and far-fetched second half.

Sircar handles sensitive moments well; I suspect he might churn out quite a tender love story. However a weak script, filmi dialogues (especially towards the end), and the S-L-O-W pace sink this film. The actors do well; Shergill is as earnest as ever and Ms. Lamba makes an impressive debut as innocent Adaa. Yashpal Sharma plays to the hilt the role of Shakeel, and portrays his shaky convictions well. Other characters’s like Adaa’s dadi and Major Rathod also act ably. Character definition is not as slick – especially Adaa’s. Sometimes shy and sometimes caustic, her character seems to veer from an innocent valley girl, subject to the insecurities of new-found love, to that of a tenacious-willed woman, willing to go public about her “un-acceptable” relationship.

The music has a very Kashmiri flavor to it, but the songs, save one, aren’t really worth remembering. The locales are of course beautiful, and the director displays Kashmir well. I wouldn’t really recommend this film, inspite all the things going for it, because of it’s lackadaisical gait (where’s an editor when you need one ?). However, if attempting to watch :

– Do not view film from a supine position, ensconsed in cosy comforters (as I did) or all will be lost.
– Do keep large reserves of patience at hand. They will be needed.
– Persevere and thou shall see the end of this film !

Posted in 2005, bollywood, drama | Comments Off on Review : Yahaan

Review : Maine pyar kyun kiya

Rating : Poor (2.75/5)
Genre : Comedy
Year : 2005
Running time : 144 minutes
Director : David Dhawan
Cast : Salman Khan, Sushmita Sen, Katrina Kaif, Sohail Khan, Arshad Warsi, Bina Kak, Rajpal Yadav

MANE PYAR KYUN KIYA (MPKK) : Dumb and dumber !

Oh, what a quandary people ! Is MPKK more stupid than silly, or is it more silly than stupid ? What a dilemma – really stressing me out ! Maybe, I should “just chill”. Or better still, maybe I shouldn’t have seen the movie at all (what I do for you, my readers !). I am allergic to David Dhawan’s films generally speaking. But this one is just impossible. Admittedly, it has lots of color, energy, and good songs. What it lacks is a script which can stand on its own, and some rhyme and reason even in a farcical comedy such as this. Anyway, here goes :

Samir Malhotra (Khan) is an orthopedic surgeon. Now, I do believe that the words “Salman Khan” and “Doctor” are oxymorons. Imagining (even for a fraction of a second) Khan in the role of a doctor, is akin to building the Taj Mahal on Jupiter; stretching the imagination this far puts a great deal of stress on already fragile, Hindi movie-fed minds. I digress however – back to the story.

So Salman’s a Doctor, and Naina (Sen) is his devoted nurse-cum-assistant. Dear Doctor is a pure-bred Casanova – chases anything female. And then to avoid entanglements tells the females in question that he’s already married, which causes the women to back off. Not so with current flame Sonia. Samir wants to marry Sonia, but Sonia won’t marry Samir until she meets his wife (talk about a guilt complex !). Samir is in a quandary until he persuades Naina to impersonate his non-existent wife. However, there is no end to Sonia’s demands. Now she wants to meet his children too! And then she wants to witness his divorce proceedings !

Samir’s rather elaborate drama is interrupted by his slap-happy mother’s (Kak) arrival from dear old Punjab. Mom banishes all thought of Samir’s divorce and organizes a honeymoon for Samir and Naina. Naina is a good egg, and suffers through it all. However, soon the jig is up, and Mom retires to introspect, leaving Samir free to pursue Sonia once more. Do things work out ? The rest of the movie reveals all.

OK, people, not to give out spoilers, but this film was supposed to be a comedic romance; you know the ones where the delectable prince realise his true love (the one under his nose all the time) at last. However this movie didn’t turn out that way (no warm, mushy feeling at the end), primarily beacause :

1. The prince wasn’t that delectable
2. The women were way too smart and leggy for this Doctor

I mean Sen looked more the doctor than Salman. And Sen sort of exudes common-sense, which would automatically preclude Salman from the list of prospective bridegrooms, wouldn’t it ? As far as acting goes, everyone did decently enough – as much as the script allowed. The best of all was Sohail Khan (as Pyaare, Sonia’s besotted neighbor) delivering a perky, slap-stick-y performance with natural elan. Rajpal Yadav is wasted in a two-bit role, and Warsi has a few, flitting scenes, as Samir’s equally Casanov-ish friend.

Now, I do agree that with Dhawan-esque comedies you’d be better off not expecting logic and common-sense. However, can there not be a semblance of, a shred of a semblance of character definition? Asking for the moon ? Well, maybe. All-in-all, you might enjoy this one, if keeping your eyes open is all you’re up for. If you’d like more, then MPKK’s not for you.

Posted in 2005, bollywood, drama | Comments Off on Review : Maine pyar kyun kiya

Review : Sehar

Rating : Excellent (4.5/5)
Genre : Drama, Action
Year : 2005
Running time : approx. 2 hrs
Director : Kabeer Kaushik
Cast: Arshad Warsi, Mahima Chaudhary, Pankaj Kapoor, Sushant Singh, Suhasini Mulay, Ravi Jhankal

SEHAR : Nicely done !

Once in a while you come across this little known movie, which didn’t even make it to the cinema halls (in the US), and you see it because you are an avid movie watcher. And this little unknown movie with secondary star-power turns out to be a diamond in the rough. “Sehar” is excellent, better than “D”, though not as good as “Company”. Acting is good, screenplay taut, and dialogues are meaty, succint; not a syllable goes waste. Director Kaushik is here to stay.

The film is narrated in flashback by a University Professor Tiwari (Kapoor). The professor, a scholarly man has helped the police in tracking criminals. Ajay Kumar (Arshad Warsi) is the newly appointed, honest SSP of Lucknow police. Of his family only his mother (Mulay) remains, and she inspires and motivates him to do the right thing. Ajay tries to crack down on the UP mafia, but more often than not is betrayed by information-leaking local police officials. His boss tries to aid him by shielding him from political pressures, and by getting sanction for Ajay’s brainchild – a Special Task Force (STF), which would work across local jurisdictions, and state lines.

Criminal activities in UP are dominated by Gajraj (Sushant Singh) and his gang. Aided and abetted in his nefarious activities by feudal lords and politicians, Gajraj is an intelligent and ruthless criminal. Trying to pin him down, the STF takes help from a physics professor Tiwari (Kapoor) who helps them track down cell-phone conversations, and thereby the location of the criminals. The STF then makes headway in combating crime across the state, but is still unable to get Gajraj.

The final attempt to get Gajraj forms the climax of the film.

The romantic angle is provided by Anamika (Chaudhary), daughter of an erstwhile friend, an Army Major. Perpetually chiffon clad Anamika is an Economics professor at the university. Although her acting is passable, Mahima presents a highly glamorous and very unrealistic “look” for an Economics professor – a slip-up in an otherwise stunning film.

The film is moderately paced, a well-thought out and beautifully executed presentation. This is a novel story, in that it’s from the policeman’s perpspective, giving credence to the police force for the work they do. Warsi delivers an under-stated but highy effective performance as SSP Ajay, portraying Ajay’s willingness to fight criminal targets as well as his inner demons. With this display of finesse, Warsi proves that he is actor to contend with in meaty, serious roles. He is ably aided by other fine artistes like Mulay and Kapoor.

Most characters in the film are well-defined, and speak true UP-ite hindi. The basic cop-against-hoodlum story is strenghtened by apt dialogues, a strong screenplay, and the presumption of intelligence (very rare these days). Be prepared however, for graphic (sometimes gory) fight sequences. A “clean” film by any standards, it doesn’t have any item numbers (probably accounts for lack of film’s commercial appeal) or bare skin (except Mahima’s deep neck-lines). Nowhere does Kaushik let slip the reins of direction, giving us a polished, interesting product. This is a sincere, tell-it-like-it-is film, and it’s earnestness doesn’t fail to touch the viewer.

In the filmworld, there are hits and misses. “Sehar” is a direct hit.

Posted in 2005, bollywood, drama, outstanding, rating-PG13, recommended, thriller | Tagged | 6 Comments